Subliminal Talk

I'm looking at interacting with eye contact/language, but that may or may not make it in.

I keep seeing you mention BEAST but since i don't keep up with the forum anymore like i used to, i have no idea what it is, please enlighten me

(09-22-2016, 09:05 AM)RoaringLion Wrote: [ -> ]I keep seeing you mention BEAST but since i don't keep up with the forum anymore like i used to, i have no idea what it is, please enlighten me

"Beast" is the code name for the 6G prototype. I call it that because it is a beast in terms of complexity, challenge to work on, and how powerful it has become. The next build is Beast 8. It will probably be built tonight.

Glad to hear the progress made on both Beast and DMSI 3.0, keep up the great work Shannon.

For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

(09-22-2016, 03:49 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]We will get there if it is within my power. Sometimes I get discouraged, but there's always the next day when I realize that regardless of my discouragement or whatever else, the job must get done and I am not aware of everything. If I have been set on this path, there must be a good reason. So I soldier on.

Well you shattered the ceilings of what was considered humanly possible, and continue to do so all the time. You're surely more than halfway "there" when it comes to dmsi.

And perhaps you'll uncover something as you finish GPR / MHS / MIR that will be useful for dmsi / 6g. Perhaps journals from the physical healing subs will provide you with crucial data you didn't know you needed. Just thinking out loud here...

Either way, have you ever gotten females to test any of the newer versions? If the sub works for them, you can safely say that you achieved the goal, but there's a missing element the gents are having trouble with, and the ladies' success will indicate something. So more versatile testing might also be useful there.

(09-22-2016, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

I'm certainly working on it. You guys who have the most trouble seem to give me the most ideas. Frustrating, but effective.

I think this will come about when I finish implementing P4, make the energy sourcing right for fully powering the program in real time, and adjust a few other things.

(09-22-2016, 10:08 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-22-2016, 03:49 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]We will get there if it is within my power. Sometimes I get discouraged, but there's always the next day when I realize that regardless of my discouragement or whatever else, the job must get done and I am not aware of everything. If I have been set on this path, there must be a good reason. So I soldier on.

Well you shattered the ceilings of what was considered humanly possible, and continue to do so all the time. You're surely more than halfway "there" when it comes to dmsi.

And perhaps you'll uncover something as you finish GPR / MHS / MIR that will be useful for dmsi / 6g. Perhaps journals from the physical healing subs will provide you with crucial data you didn't know you needed. Just thinking out loud here...

Either way, have you ever gotten females to test any of the newer versions? If the sub works for them, you can safely say that you achieved the goal, but there's a missing element the gents are having trouble with, and the ladies' success will indicate something. So more versatile testing might also be useful there.

I have had very limited opportunity to have female testers for DMSI. Only my girlfriend and one other. The other tested a couple times back in 2.1/2.2 only. GF consistently reports that DMSI is a very effective aphrodisiac whenever I expose her, but I am more than a little reluctant to expose her because of what it's designed to do. She definitely becomes more sexually aroused, interested, aggressive and initiates more after exposure, which is interesting given how highly sexual and initiatory she is to begin with. But, I don't want to give the advice to use DMSI as an aphrodisiac yet because I am not done determining what the safety effects are. Have to go slowly and carefully with that.

(09-22-2016, 10:47 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-22-2016, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

I'm certainly working on it. You guys who have the most trouble seem to give me the most ideas. Frustrating, but effective.

I think this will come about when I finish implementing P4, make the energy sourcing right for fully powering the program in real time, and adjust a few other things.

Haha, that's funny!

Seriously, I think it's clear why we do that. Because we ourselves are in the situation, so seeing how others get progress, honestly measuring ourselves to that and not BS'ing ourselves about where we are at, we can see choke points much clearer. Makes sense to me.

I'm glad to hear things are moving along. I'm very excited for the next version. For now, I will concentrate on V2.4 snowflake spam.

BEAST MODE ACTIVATED!!!

Simply amazing, stupendous, salutary!

What are the physical applications of this, I wonder... (D type?)

(09-22-2016, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

I just don't think that's important or productive. Some of the girls who have shown the least visible signs have been the most interested when I escalated and vice versa. You find out if a girls into you by escalating In fact in my experience, escalating fast usually increases interest and attraction, so I feel the program should focus on giving us the balls to act rather than attempting to change the personalities of the people we are interested in.

How about we remember what DMSI is for - giving THEM the "balls to act", not you!

(09-22-2016, 11:11 AM)RisingSon Wrote: [ -> ]BEAST MODE ACTIVATED!!!

Simply amazing, stupendous, salutary!

What are the physical applications of this, I wonder... (D type?)

Type C (physical adjustment) is almost entirely unexplored right now. Type D (manifestation) is in the initial stages of exploration and is looking promising.

(09-22-2016, 11:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]How about we remember what DMSI is for - giving THEM the "balls to act", not you!

I thought dmsi was about achieving as much sex as possible with attractive parties?
Regardless I think waiting for extremely obvious signs is unproductive, and holds many guys back from actually getting laid. A great sexual interaction is one where you don't even know who made the first move, it just happens like two magnets drawn together, and hoping that they'll make the move prevents you from allowing that.