Subliminal Talk

Full Version: Shannon's Journal Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691
I'm looking at interacting with eye contact/language, but that may or may not make it in.
I keep seeing you mention BEAST but since i don't keep up with the forum anymore like i used to, i have no idea what it is, please enlighten me
(09-22-2016, 09:05 AM)RoaringLion Wrote: [ -> ]I keep seeing you mention BEAST but since i don't keep up with the forum anymore like i used to, i have no idea what it is, please enlighten me

"Beast" is the code name for the 6G prototype. I call it that because it is a beast in terms of complexity, challenge to work on, and how powerful it has become. The next build is Beast 8. It will probably be built tonight.
Glad to hear the progress made on both Beast and DMSI 3.0, keep up the great work Shannon.
For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.
(09-22-2016, 03:49 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]We will get there if it is within my power. Sometimes I get discouraged, but there's always the next day when I realize that regardless of my discouragement or whatever else, the job must get done and I am not aware of everything. If I have been set on this path, there must be a good reason. So I soldier on.

Well you shattered the ceilings of what was considered humanly possible, and continue to do so all the time. You're surely more than halfway "there" when it comes to dmsi.

And perhaps you'll uncover something as you finish GPR / MHS / MIR that will be useful for dmsi / 6g. Perhaps journals from the physical healing subs will provide you with crucial data you didn't know you needed. Just thinking out loud here...

Either way, have you ever gotten females to test any of the newer versions? If the sub works for them, you can safely say that you achieved the goal, but there's a missing element the gents are having trouble with, and the ladies' success will indicate something. So more versatile testing might also be useful there.
(09-22-2016, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

I'm certainly working on it. You guys who have the most trouble seem to give me the most ideas. Frustrating, but effective.

I think this will come about when I finish implementing P4, make the energy sourcing right for fully powering the program in real time, and adjust a few other things.
(09-22-2016, 10:08 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-22-2016, 03:49 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]We will get there if it is within my power. Sometimes I get discouraged, but there's always the next day when I realize that regardless of my discouragement or whatever else, the job must get done and I am not aware of everything. If I have been set on this path, there must be a good reason. So I soldier on.

Well you shattered the ceilings of what was considered humanly possible, and continue to do so all the time. You're surely more than halfway "there" when it comes to dmsi.

And perhaps you'll uncover something as you finish GPR / MHS / MIR that will be useful for dmsi / 6g. Perhaps journals from the physical healing subs will provide you with crucial data you didn't know you needed. Just thinking out loud here...

Either way, have you ever gotten females to test any of the newer versions? If the sub works for them, you can safely say that you achieved the goal, but there's a missing element the gents are having trouble with, and the ladies' success will indicate something. So more versatile testing might also be useful there.

I have had very limited opportunity to have female testers for DMSI. Only my girlfriend and one other. The other tested a couple times back in 2.1/2.2 only. GF consistently reports that DMSI is a very effective aphrodisiac whenever I expose her, but I am more than a little reluctant to expose her because of what it's designed to do. She definitely becomes more sexually aroused, interested, aggressive and initiates more after exposure, which is interesting given how highly sexual and initiatory she is to begin with. But, I don't want to give the advice to use DMSI as an aphrodisiac yet because I am not done determining what the safety effects are. Have to go slowly and carefully with that.
(09-22-2016, 10:47 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-22-2016, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

I'm certainly working on it. You guys who have the most trouble seem to give me the most ideas. Frustrating, but effective.

I think this will come about when I finish implementing P4, make the energy sourcing right for fully powering the program in real time, and adjust a few other things.

Haha, that's funny!

Seriously, I think it's clear why we do that. Because we ourselves are in the situation, so seeing how others get progress, honestly measuring ourselves to that and not BS'ing ourselves about where we are at, we can see choke points much clearer. Makes sense to me.

I'm glad to hear things are moving along. I'm very excited for the next version. For now, I will concentrate on V2.4 snowflake spam.
BEAST MODE ACTIVATED!!!

Simply amazing, stupendous, salutary!

What are the physical applications of this, I wonder... (D type?)
(09-22-2016, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

I just don't think that's important or productive. Some of the girls who have shown the least visible signs have been the most interested when I escalated and vice versa. You find out if a girls into you by escalating In fact in my experience, escalating fast usually increases interest and attraction, so I feel the program should focus on giving us the balls to act rather than attempting to change the personalities of the people we are interested in.
How about we remember what DMSI is for - giving THEM the "balls to act", not you!
(09-22-2016, 11:11 AM)RisingSon Wrote: [ -> ]BEAST MODE ACTIVATED!!!

Simply amazing, stupendous, salutary!

What are the physical applications of this, I wonder... (D type?)

Type C (physical adjustment) is almost entirely unexplored right now. Type D (manifestation) is in the initial stages of exploration and is looking promising.
(09-22-2016, 11:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]How about we remember what DMSI is for - giving THEM the "balls to act", not you!

I thought dmsi was about achieving as much sex as possible with attractive parties?
Regardless I think waiting for extremely obvious signs is unproductive, and holds many guys back from actually getting laid. A great sexual interaction is one where you don't even know who made the first move, it just happens like two magnets drawn together, and hoping that they'll make the move prevents you from allowing that.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691