Interesting. I had thought that DMSI 3.01 was going to be the first 6g sub. Does that mean that there will be a version 4 using full 6g quite soon after (6g development seems to be nearing completion?)?
Shannon, why don't you split your journal into subliminal and perfume entries?
Or make another sticky with "Shannon's Perfume Journal"?
I also like the idea of increasing the romantic titles in 5G or 5.5G.
But a program that I'd really love to see is the positive ultra success that you planned for your gf. Including luck magnifier, winner's mindset, everything is possible and seek the challenge seems to be to be a real source of success. Seek the challenge makes you seek out more and more opportunities to grow bigger and winner's mindset gets you the attitude to win everything that you start. It is a cycle to success. A way to the next level. Do it in 5.5G and I will try to be the first buyer.
What is P5 again? I can't seem to find where Shannon mentioned it.
Edit: how trippy would it be if the models say the best amount of loops is 1?
A question on POSE and X series subs: I wonder if, further to producing arousal, these X series subs are made to drop sexual inhibitions. By these I mean, things that affected partner would normally be reluctant to do, because “they don’t do that sort of thing”. Stuff that should be mandatory, but “good girls” don’t do.
Also I wonder if there is something in this effect in DMSI or SM, and instruction for the other person to drop their sexual inhibitions to please the user in any way he wants.
Is DMSI V3.0.1 be a free upgrade for DMSI 2.5 users or full price?
Shannon,
November 21 2016 is almost here.
I had some ideas for DMSI v3.0.1 and I know some of this might seem nonsensical or illogical, but so are sexual decisions. So to me, it seems to fit right in.
1) The responders miss the user even if they haven't met the user
2) The responders are searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know what they're looking for or what they're wanting
3) The longer they go with out sex with the user, the more the responders want to have sex with the user.
4) They wonder where the user is and what the user is doing.
5) They look at their phone and wonder what's taking the user so long to contact them.
6) They plan things they want to sexually do with the user.
7) Their minds keep defaulting back to thoughts of the user.
8) They feel warm when they think of the user or when something reminds them of the user.
9) They put the user in all their sexual fantasies
10) They substitute the user in all their pleasant sexual memories in place of the people they had sex with because they wish the user was the only sexual partner they ever had.
11) Every orgasm they have with the user is even more intense and longer lasting than the previous one.
12) Each orgasm they have with the user is easier to achieve than the previous one.
13) They can easily be on the cusp of orgasm (edging) for extended periods of time when they have sex with the user
14) When they masturbate, the most satisfying and fulfilling feelings and orgasms are those that include the user.
15) (I don't know how to best phrase this) The responders effectively deal with (nullify, assuage, etc.) all potential social and emotional barriers to having sex with the user, such as worries about what her friends think, fear of her reputation being sullied, fear of losing status, fears of being judged, inconsistent follow through, forgetfulness, life chaos, her work schedule, lack of motivation on her part, worries that she's not pretty enough, fear of rejection, etc. and they do so in such a way that it results in actual physical sex with the responders and the user.
16) The responders are actively searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know the user
17) The responders have a feeling of destiny regarding the user and having sex with the user repeatedly
18) The responders have the "where have you been for all of my (sex) life" feeling about the user
19) The responders feel like everything they know and everything they have experienced points directly at having sex with the user repeatedly, like everything in their life has been leading up to it
20) The responders feel like having sex with the user is the most liberating experience ever and that it re-enforces their sense of independence and self-acceptance.
21) The responders crave the experience of feeling surrendered to the user, and actively seek it out and facilitate it.
22) The responders feel grateful about having sex with the user.
23) The responders can't imagine better sex than the sex with the user
24) The user fulfills and satisfies sexual needs, wants, and desires that the responders didn't even know they had and/or didn't even imagine were possible.
25) The responders desire sex with the user and only the user. All else just feel like second best.
I'm sure you could word them much better, but the concepts are there.
(11-19-2016, 08:20 AM)Dmitry Wrote: [ -> ]Is DMSI V3.0.1 be a free upgrade for DMSI 2.5 users or full price?
All versions until final (working) release are free.
Hello Shannon!
I was just wondering, I know you said the emotional shielding from E2 *IS* going into V3.0.1. I remember recommending putting in Remove Negativity Within 4G awhile ago which I feel would be a massive help to DMSI. You said after that, that you were putting in PTPA 4G.
I was just wondering, have you put in, or are still in the process of putting in, PTPA 4G into V3.0.1?
(11-19-2016, 01:50 AM)swisston Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting. I had thought that DMSI 3.01 was going to be the first 6g sub. Does that mean that there will be a version 4 using full 6g quite soon after (6g development seems to be nearing completion?)?
This was what i thought too. And i also heard something about an end of November release as well which exploded my curiosity for 6G.
I'm still in the patiently waiting camp for BASE 6G. Maybe next year around this time *fingers crossed*
But since 6G is a bit more refined now, though incomplete, I'm wondering how close 5.5G has come to 6G now. Is it 66% as effective as 6G? 75%?
I'm guessing (anticipating Shannon's response) that we can't know because 6G isn't finished yet, and we can't quantify what we have against something that isn't complete yet.
I have a question Shannon.
With DMSI, if you happen to cross paths with a girl that's a manifestation, and don't interact with her then, will you cross paths again because she's a manifestation? Or are the DMSI manifestations each one-time only (which I wouldn't like)?
Thanks
(11-19-2016, 01:50 AM)swisston Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting. I had thought that DMSI 3.01 was going to be the first 6g sub. Does that mean that there will be a version 4 using full 6g quite soon after (6g development seems to be nearing completion?)?
You thought wrong. We are far from the first 6G sub. There is a lot more to add, a lot more to "mine" from the current 6G prototype, and the development of the 6G prototype is - as far as I know - probably a few versions away from finished. So there is a LOT left to do before 6G shows up.
I can't wok on 6G dev while I am building subs. And right now, I am building MIR/GPR/MHS/DMSI and if the mail ever goes through, I may still have that custom contract.
MIR/GPR/MHS are rated critically important right now.
6G will come out after DMSI achieves final status, most likely.
(11-19-2016, 02:58 AM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, why don't you split your journal into subliminal and perfume entries?
Or make another sticky with "Shannon's Perfume Journal"?
Maybe I'll do that.
Quote:I also like the idea of increasing the romantic titles in 5G or 5.5G.
But a program that I'd really love to see is the positive ultra success that you planned for your gf. Including luck magnifier, winner's mindset, everything is possible and seek the challenge seems to be to be a real source of success. Seek the challenge makes you seek out more and more opportunities to grow bigger and winner's mindset gets you the attitude to win everything that you start. It is a cycle to success. A way to the next level. Do it in 5.5G and I will try to be the first buyer.
Throw another one in queue. I'm working as fast as I can right now, but still falling behind for various reasons.
(11-19-2016, 05:17 AM)Aventus45 Wrote: [ -> ]What is P5 again? I can't seem to find where Shannon mentioned it.
Edit: how trippy would it be if the models say the best amount of loops is 1?
P3 maxes out the word count.
P4 optimizes P3 and puts the word count where it is most effective.
P5 acts as a way to increase and improve the effects of P3 and P4.
(11-19-2016, 06:25 AM)Barba Wrote: [ -> ]A question on POSE and X series subs: I wonder if, further to producing arousal, these X series subs are made to drop sexual inhibitions. By these I mean, things that affected partner would normally be reluctant to do, because “they don’t do that sort of thing”. Stuff that should be mandatory, but “good girls” don’t do.
They are made to lower sexual inhibitions, except for X124, POSE V1 and V3. However, the technology they use is really old now and not powerful enough to fully achieve that goal.
Also I wonder if there is something in this effect in DMSI or SM, and instruction for the other person to drop their sexual inhibitions to please the user in any way he wants.
[/quote]
DMSI has a disinhibitor, but not SM. The disinhibitor is not paired with specific instructions to "please the user in any way he wants" though.