(12-02-2016, 07:10 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2016, 09:35 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2016, 09:15 PM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2016, 09:11 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2016, 09:01 PM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]I'm embarrassed to say this but I don't know how to check against the md5 hashes. I don't know what to look for or how interpret them or what to compare them to.
Same here. Maybe Shannon can put a sticky somewhere.
If you guys are running Windows, here's an easy-to-use freeware checker: http://www.winmd5.com/
All instructions should be there.
I will try to remember to make a sticky tomorrow.
In case you forget Shannon
Should I be worried? I never checked this stuff i don't know how I been listening to subliminals from Shannon for a while. Could I have been doing this in vain?
I made a sticky thread in the FAQ section.
The MD5 hash values are useful in two cases.
1. You get your copy of my subs from a source other than IML or directly from me personally - which of course means you're probably pirating them, and you don;t know if they've been tampered with. An MD5 sum hash will prove mathematically if they are tampered with or not.
2. You want to verify that an audio file you got from IML downloaded without errors.
3. You want to verify file length.
It is extremely unlikely that you got a bad download, but it can and does happen. It is also a way to know whether the files on the server have become corrupt.
If there is an error in the file as a result of download, you will usually see that your player cannot open the file or refuses to play it. If it plays, it will most likely only have an audio glitch contained within a single second of audio. Regardless, only a file that passes the hash check is for sure safe to use, as only such a file is absolutely certainly what I created it to be.
If you haven't been checking, and have experienced no audio glitches, it is very unlikely that you have used my subs in vain.
(12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ]actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.
I'm confused.
I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?
What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270
BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051
The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output.
What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them.
I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator.
(12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?
It would suggest that you're not executing the euphoria section of scripting, at the least.
Direct resistance is correlating more and more with headaches, while execution should correlate with euphoria, or at least a sensation pf pleasantness. To me, the sensation is much like a cross between morphine and a full body massage.
If you get neither effect (headache nor pleasure) this suggests that you may be stonewalling the script. Are you seeing any other results?
(12-02-2016, 08:56 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote: [ -> ]hi Ben/Shannon
i just received a MySql error as i tried to open this page and the error information also included the plain sql query that is being run. this is very dangerous and is giving valuable information to a hacker who wants to attack the forum software and can lead to personal info being leaked to the attacker, besides many other things.
i am sure there is a way to disable detailed error messages and just give basic error response in forum settings or web server settings. i think that setting should be enabled to maximize security.
Thanks for the heads up. We have it under control.
(12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ]actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.
I'm confused.
I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?
What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270
BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051
The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output.
What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them.
I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator.
I think that on a Linux type system the hash is outputed before the name of the file while on Mac it's first the name of the file and after that the hash sum.
(12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ]actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.
I'm confused.
I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?
What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270
BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051
The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output.
What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them.
I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator.
Something is wrong then here's the proof. To the right highlighted on the txt file are the hd5 values for the flac and mp3 for stage 6. They are backwards or am i reading this wrong?
(12-03-2016, 02:30 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ] (12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ]actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.
I'm confused.
I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?
What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270
BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051
The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output.
What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them.
I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator.
Something is wrong then here's the proof. To the right highlighted on the txt file are the hd5 values for the flac and mp3 for stage 6. They are backwards or am i reading this wrong?
In Shannon's file the hash sum is before file name while on your terminal the hash sum is after so the file is good.
(12-03-2016, 12:21 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2016, 09:37 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
I was wondering about the healing and clearing.
There was clearing/healing in v2.2 and v2.4 and this one. Now I was thinking that I would think each time there should be less healing or less intensity because wouldn't all the healing or clearing be cumulative?
So I started thinking about the layers of an onion analogy. But an analogy isn't proof, just an idea or explanation.
So then I started to wonder, is the healing or clear set up to resolve the content (such as the actual issue), and the processes that may have sustained or created the issue(s).
In other words, let's suppose I'm afraid of women who taller than me because when I was in first grade a teacher yelled at me so much I was afraid of that teacher and then my mind translated that into fearing all women who were taller than me. So there is the content of that fear (fear of tall women), but then there is also the processes that might have led to that being developed and sustained such as feeling helpless, thinking I can't protect myself, thinking no one would help me, feeling vulnerable, not being assertive, and so forth.
Now the fear of women who are taller than me may get resolved, but with all those other processes in play... what if a dog starts acting vicious towards me and charges me (but doesn't bite me)... there are still those processes (feeling helpless, thinking I can't protect myself, thinking no one would help me, feeling vulnerable, not being assertive, and so forth) that leave me open to developing a fear of dogs.
So to me it would seem important to clear or heal the processes that cause fears in the first place so no new fears develop so we don't need to keep healing endlessly. Eliminate the processes that create fears, and then no more fears are created and the remaining ones are picked off one by one... or eliminate what sustains the remaining fears and then they all collapse as a group.
I hope I'm making sense.
Does the healing or clearing in DMSI address both the processes and content of what needs to be healed?
The healing and clearing does whatever is necessary to achieve the goals of the program, within the parameters given to shield the conscious mind and emotions from any unpleasant effects of the process.
Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful.
(12-03-2016, 03:43 AM)robstar Wrote: [ -> ]Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful.
Only if they're directed related to women/sex etc. I suspect.
However, I can comment on panic attacks themselves relating to subs. My brother suffers from them badly, and has Lorazepam on hand when I take him out in case the panic attacks (paranoia) set in. I've had him running E2 for a little over 2 months now, and two weekends in a row now the last two times, no Lorazepam used!!!
That has never happened before, mind you. Every time out the paranoia set in sooner or later annoyingly ruining the whole night. Now, even if it does happen, playing the sub gets rid of it relatively quickly, within minutes. Before the Lorazepam, he wouldn't have been able to go out with me, it wasn't practical and usually ended in a hospital visit due to the paranoia. I'm keeping him on E2 until E3 debuts, or a revision of E2 to bring it up to DMSI power levels.
E2 is tailor made for dealing with that kind of thing. I'd recommend E2 over anything else. It gets the job done for that, period.
(12-03-2016, 03:49 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ] (12-03-2016, 03:43 AM)robstar Wrote: [ -> ]Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful.
Only if they're directed related to women/sex etc. I suspect.
However, I can comment on panic attacks themselves relating to subs. My brother suffers from them badly, and has Lorazepam on hand when I take him out in case the panic attacks (paranoia) set in. I've had him running E2 for a little over 2 months now, and two weekends in a row now the last two times, no Lorazepam used!!! That has never happened before, mind you. Every time out the paranoia set in sooner or later annoyingly ruining the whole night. Now, even if it does happen, playing the sub gets rid of it relatively quickly, within minutes. Before the Lorazepam, he wouldn't have been able to go out with me, it wasn't practical and usually ended in a hospital visit due to the paranoia. I'm keeping him on E2 until E3 debuts, or a revision of E2 to bring it up to DMSI power levels.
E2 is tailor made for dealing with that kind of thing. I'd recommend E2 over anything else. It gets the job done for that, period.
I don't think they are related to women/sex, but Shannon said anything that would interfere with the goals of the program. They definitely interfere because they make me barely want to leave the house, and hinder my ability to socialise. I know E2 is great, I've been on it two weeks now, but hey, if there is any chance DMSI could also help with this, I'd rather run it!
(12-03-2016, 03:54 AM)robstar Wrote: [ -> ] (12-03-2016, 03:49 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ] (12-03-2016, 03:43 AM)robstar Wrote: [ -> ]Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful.
Only if they're directed related to women/sex etc. I suspect.
However, I can comment on panic attacks themselves relating to subs. My brother suffers from them badly, and has Lorazepam on hand when I take him out in case the panic attacks (paranoia) set in. I've had him running E2 for a little over 2 months now, and two weekends in a row now the last two times, no Lorazepam used!!! That has never happened before, mind you. Every time out the paranoia set in sooner or later annoyingly ruining the whole night. Now, even if it does happen, playing the sub gets rid of it relatively quickly, within minutes. Before the Lorazepam, he wouldn't have been able to go out with me, it wasn't practical and usually ended in a hospital visit due to the paranoia. I'm keeping him on E2 until E3 debuts, or a revision of E2 to bring it up to DMSI power levels.
E2 is tailor made for dealing with that kind of thing. I'd recommend E2 over anything else. It gets the job done for that, period.
I don't think they are related to women/sex, but Shannon said anything that would interfere with the goals of the program. They definitely interfere because they make me barely want to leave the house, and hinder my ability to socialise. I know E2 is great, I've been on it two weeks now, but hey, if there is any chance DMSI could also help with this, I'd rather run it!
I don't think they are, either. I can tell you're trying to run it and rationalising a reason to jump to it. That's why I posted to help you see you have the golden ticket in your hands already, bud. I'm just saying what works, and I've seen it first hand, to get rid of your issues. Ultimately it's your choice, just trying to help you make the right choice for panic attacks (paranoia). My previous post is an amazing testimony of E2, proof of it clearly removing very serious entrenched panic attacks (paranoia) after only 2 months of listening and I'm sure most people don't have them as bad as my brother does or DID perhaps is more accurate of the two at this point. If that doesn't sway you, then fair enough.
Panic attacks (paranoia) will ruin everything and it can happen at any time seemingly out of nowhere. I've seen first hand how much of life that panic attacks (paranoia) rob from you and those around you. I hope you get them sorted.
I know you want DMSI...it's the flavour of the month. I was just speaking about proof I've witnessed about E2 removing VERY VERY serious panic attacks (paranoia) after 2 months of listening that either require reliance on medication to control or hospitalisation...to tell you E2 is very effective at dealing with them. I'm supremely impressed so far with his run on E2, if it works for HIS panic attacks (paranoia), I'd wager they'd work for anyone's!
Hopefully for you, Shannon will tell you the answer you wish to hear...If not, the good news is, you already have an amazing program that is able to remove these panic attacks (paranoia) in time.
(12-03-2016, 04:56 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, subliminal text and visual subliminal (images, photos, etc.)
Which one is the most impact of the subconscious mind or brain?
I bet the visual one. But maybe you know something more.
http://www.businessballs.com/vaklearningstylestest.htm
vak - visual, auditory, kinesthetic - learning styles model and free self-test
Have you ever taken this test? Teacher's use it to find out the best way a child absorbs information that is being taught to them.
Since you are drawn to the visual, you are probably a visual person.
(12-03-2016, 08:16 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: [ -> ]Hmm. Great. I have been test myself like this before. I were visual. 50 percents visual 30 percents kinesthetic and twenty percent auditory.
But, does text also images?
(12-03-2016, 08:17 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: [ -> ]I am just wonder about subliminal that flashes the text and images.
That would be considered visual because you are using your eyes to read the text.
Is it more effective than Shannon's subliminals? Probably not.
Is it effective for you? Probably so because you are a visual person.