(07-17-2021, 12:46 PM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 11:18 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 07:44 AM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon,
Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?
What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?
At this point - is it still considered experimental?
Hybrid is what I use for OFv3, which is 5.75.7G. I use it continually. Others have used it to overcome bouts of resistance. It's very effective at what it does.
I don't know if Shannon is still considering only producing masked and ultrasonic. I hope not.
For $114.95
Shannon produces...
2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in MP3
2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in FLAC
Also, he needs a drive large enough to store all this digital information.
That is a lot of work for 1 person!!
Yep. Thanks for pointing out the obvious.
That doesn't change the fact that hybrid is more effective for some people such as myself and for some that run into a rough patch of resistance. So again, I hope that a Shannon doesn't discontinue the hybrid format.
My apologies if I offended you!! Yes, I was pointing out the obvious, some people don't realize the value we are getting for what we are paying.
In my defense, I wasn't aware that Shannon was thinking about ending the hybrid format.
(07-17-2021, 01:11 PM)4Kingdoms Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 12:46 PM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 11:18 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 07:44 AM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon,
Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?
What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?
At this point - is it still considered experimental?
Hybrid is what I use for OFv3, which is 5.75.7G. I use it continually. Others have used it to overcome bouts of resistance. It's very effective at what it does.
I don't know if Shannon is still considering only producing masked and ultrasonic. I hope not.
For $114.95
Shannon produces...
2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in MP3
2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in FLAC
Also, he needs a drive large enough to store all this digital information.
That is a lot of work for 1 person!!
Yep. Thanks for pointing out the obvious.
That doesn't change the fact that hybrid is more effective for some people such as myself and for some that run into a rough patch of resistance. So again, I hope that a Shannon doesn't discontinue the hybrid format.
My apologies if I offended you!! Yes, I was pointing out the obvious, some people don't realize the value we are getting for what we are paying.
In my defense, I wasn't aware that Shannon was thinking about ending the hybrid format.
As I understand it, Shannon questioned whether or not the hybrid format would exceed a person's ability to decode and decipher all of the information at this level of technology. Theoretically, hybrid is 2x more powerful because it provides 2x the input. I believe that it's more than 2x more power and I believe that consecutive hybrid loops provide a non linear boost.
The hybrid format has a place in the arsenals of many users, including myself. Even users for who it isn't the preferred format are seeing its benefit in a crunch. So, I'll continue to defend its production. I'm well aware of Shannon's work load and I'm well aware of what we're getting for what I consider to be a very reasonable price. I'm appreciative of that and I'm appreciative of Shannon's drive to build the best scripting technology possible. Because of that, I will continue to support IML and will continue to promote his work outside of this forum for those who are open to this type of thing.
With that said, all is well and there are no hard feelings on this end.
(07-16-2021, 01:07 PM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon Do you have a rough estimate of when you will start working on the Universal Healing sub? Is it in the pipeline?
Not yet. Every time I think I have a path forward someone reminds me of something else I have to do. :
Universal Healing was originally intended to be an offshoot of either E5 or MHS, depending on what the models say. If it's branched from E5, then it will be sooner because I'm working on E5. But I also have to work on other things on a schedule, regardless of what I may want to do or when.
(07-16-2021, 01:30 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 12:22 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 12:05 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 11:18 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 10:43 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
Regarding the “you supply the goal” program idea, wouldn’t that be what US/LM was?
I find that idea rather intriguing.
US/LM used that approach, but was not what this program would be. It was inclusive of manifestation, but it was not the primary (or even secondary) focus of the program, and it was divided into two different parts.
A next gen manifestation program using the "You Pick" concept would be focused 100% on manifesting the consciously chosen goal, as long as it remains the focus of concentration and desire. That is a blessing and a curse, because so many of you now have had your ability to focus and maintain focus so badly damaged by social media that you can't maintain a desire for more than days or weeks at a time in a lot of cases, and so in the hands of such a person, no result would ever happen because they would constantly be beginning a new manifestation as each new "shiny" caught their attention, interested them and distracted them. The next program, for example.
But it is a blessing because it would effectively create (If I can and do create it) a sort of universal wish fulfillment program. One program would allow you to manifest anything you want, and re-use it again and again, focusing on a different goal each time.
Of course it may or may not be possible, or wise, to create such a thing.
@Shannon
I see the risks associated with such a program. Would the goal manifest faster using a next-gen program assuming that one kept focus on it for the necessary time?
It will be interesting to see how this pans out in the future.
I don't have enough information on the specifics of the skeleton script used, settings, configurations, scripting options, etc. to be able to answer that.
@Shannon
Oh ok.
I never used the prior manifestation subs. Were they effective?
They were if you used them properly, executed them and didn't self sabotage. Unfortunately, 80-90% of people failed on one or more of those requirements. Usually it was self sabotage.
(07-16-2021, 05:18 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]So with UMS V2 you wouldn't come up with a conscious goal at all? (eg amount of money).
My current thoughts are that i've tried setting different goals with different methods and my money limitations/beliefs are so messed up that even amounts that aren't that big really feel out of reach for me in reality.
So I massively reduced the goal planning to meet that and then increase it, only to not reach it and just give up on the money number and just focus on my general 'mission' that I want to achieve through my business.
Not much i've tried until now has really helped shift my money programming past small realizations of some other things I can do that haven't really amounted to results.
Pretty much just finishing up something else and I have to really decide between OF V3 and UMS V2. Very hard choice. Fear is definately one of my big issues holding me back, but also lack of money to move forward in big areas of my life.
I'd focus on OFv3 first. Then again, I say that having chosen UMSv2 in the same situation. I wish I could go back to OFv3, but circumstances are forcing my hand. So maybe I should say... if it's possible... I suggest OFv3.
(07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon,
Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?
What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?
At this point - is it still considered experimental?
Hybrid format so far strongly favors the conclusion that it works, and works very well. I only have a couple of reports that suggest otherwise. I haven't used it.
Unless something changes, I will cautiously consider it non-experimental.
(07-17-2021, 07:44 AM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon,
Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?
What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?
At this point - is it still considered experimental?
Hybrid is what I use for OFv3, which is 5.75.7G. I use it continually. Others have used it to overcome bouts of resistance. It's very effective at what it does.
I don't know if Shannon is still considering only producing masked and ultrasonic. I hope not.
As long as the reports say it works, of course I'll produce it.
(07-17-2021, 11:18 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 07:44 AM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon,
Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?
What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?
At this point - is it still considered experimental?
Hybrid is what I use for OFv3, which is 5.75.7G. I use it continually. Others have used it to overcome bouts of resistance. It's very effective at what it does.
I don't know if Shannon is still considering only producing masked and ultrasonic. I hope not.
For $114.95
Shannon produces...
2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in MP3
2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in FLAC
Also, he needs a drive large enough to store all this digital information.
That is a lot of work for 1 person!!
Shannon just filled up an 8 terabyte backup drive because of this, and the fact that the files used to build each sub take up 32 to 45 gigabytes of space on top of the finished files... 12 TB replacement wasn't cheap, and took a week and a half to verify the surface, encrypt and then move the cumulative backup and current backup to. Just finished that last night. That is a lot of work too.
(07-17-2021, 12:22 PM)Z-Man Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, I have a 32GB Agptek mp3 and it plays flac files. When I played subliminal off of sd card it doesn't play it perfectly through the whole track. On the main player it plays it fine. It doesn't happen with music files. I thought it was defective and they sent me a new one and it does the same thing. Have you ever heard of that? Do you think it is the player or it just can't handle connection with subliminal off the card?
I never had that problem before. What do you think?
Never heard of this. If it plays fine on one player, but not another, then logically it is unlikely to be the SD card. It would have to be the player, and if it was replaced and continued to be an issue, it would seem to be an issue that is consistent across that particular make and model of player... try a different player altogether and see what happens. Also copy the same file to a second location on the same SD card, but with a slightly different name, and see if that one plays alright. But copy it from a source off the SD card, so that if the original file is on a damaged part of the SD card, the second copy isn't also damaged. That should tell you if it's the SD card for sure.
(07-17-2021, 04:35 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 01:30 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 12:22 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 12:05 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 11:18 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]US/LM used that approach, but was not what this program would be. It was inclusive of manifestation, but it was not the primary (or even secondary) focus of the program, and it was divided into two different parts.
A next gen manifestation program using the "You Pick" concept would be focused 100% on manifesting the consciously chosen goal, as long as it remains the focus of concentration and desire. That is a blessing and a curse, because so many of you now have had your ability to focus and maintain focus so badly damaged by social media that you can't maintain a desire for more than days or weeks at a time in a lot of cases, and so in the hands of such a person, no result would ever happen because they would constantly be beginning a new manifestation as each new "shiny" caught their attention, interested them and distracted them. The next program, for example.
But it is a blessing because it would effectively create (If I can and do create it) a sort of universal wish fulfillment program. One program would allow you to manifest anything you want, and re-use it again and again, focusing on a different goal each time.
Of course it may or may not be possible, or wise, to create such a thing.
@Shannon
I see the risks associated with such a program. Would the goal manifest faster using a next-gen program assuming that one kept focus on it for the necessary time?
It will be interesting to see how this pans out in the future.
I don't have enough information on the specifics of the skeleton script used, settings, configurations, scripting options, etc. to be able to answer that.
@Shannon
Oh ok.
I never used the prior manifestation subs. Were they effective?
They were if you used them properly, executed them and didn't self sabotage. Unfortunately, 80-90% of people failed on one or more of those requirements. Usually it was self sabotage.
@
Shannon
Ah ok
It will be interesting to see how the next manifestation subs turn out.
FRM should make a big big difference I would think
(07-17-2021, 07:14 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2021, 04:35 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 01:30 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 12:22 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2021, 12:05 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
I see the risks associated with such a program. Would the goal manifest faster using a next-gen program assuming that one kept focus on it for the necessary time?
It will be interesting to see how this pans out in the future.
I don't have enough information on the specifics of the skeleton script used, settings, configurations, scripting options, etc. to be able to answer that.
@Shannon
Oh ok.
I never used the prior manifestation subs. Were they effective?
They were if you used them properly, executed them and didn't self sabotage. Unfortunately, 80-90% of people failed on one or more of those requirements. Usually it was self sabotage.
@Shannon
Ah ok
It will be interesting to see how the next manifestation subs turn out.
FRM should make a big big difference I would think
Well I'm just getting TID from Natural Song & Lyric Writing, And I've manifested a ton of situations & people that are helping me in my music, audio engineers to come over for free and help me, other rappers who are really talented, & people who now look up to me as mentor & I got them back into music.
Literally I met 4 people at a party and we had all said after meeting that night, later in the night we said that it feels like destiny that we all met today, like we were all vibrating on the same level, and oddly enough they had wanted to become rappers, but until they met me they didn't believe in themselves, One of them had been writing raps for a long time but wasn't confident in himself, im meeting up with them next week to teach them and to practise together and have fun / get to know them more.
Shannon,once youre done with this Program,E5, I think its going to be intensely powerful and very very beneficial ,to say da least!!
Shannon's quote:
"I'm about to finish calculating toe settings from the FRM in E5, and then I have to figure out the settings for DRS. I doubt at this point that I'll finish doing DRS today, but we are very close to finished doing config work, so hopefully that's done tomorrow and then I can start building this thing.
The config coming out of the models tells me this is probably not going to be a program that goes un-noticed."
(07-19-2021, 02:58 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,once youre done with this Program,E5, I think its going to be intensely powerful and very very beneficial ,to say da least!!
Shannon's quote:
"I'm about to finish calculating toe settings from the FRM in E5, and then I have to figure out the settings for DRS. I doubt at this point that I'll finish doing DRS today, but we are very close to finished doing config work, so hopefully that's done tomorrow and then I can start building this thing.
The config coming out of the models tells me this is probably not going to be a program that goes un-noticed."
Let's just say that it's going to be real interesting to watch how E5 plays out.
And E5 will be
absolutely free of charge for all US first responders (police, sheriffs, state troopers, EMTs, etc.), all US medical doctors (including dentists) and nurses, all US military personnel including National Guard and Reservists (with proof of occupation, of course).
But it won't be free for photoshop users.
