@
Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
@
Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
(06-25-2020, 11:49 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
I wouldn't really call it a drug addiction program. The goals are to shut down any psychological, not physical, dependency on a specific type of drug; increase the user's determination to get fully healthy; and increase the person's energy levels. It's too specific to be worth trying to sell, but I have concluded that we could just turn off some script statements and build a program for boosting your energy levels from it. I'm working on it right now, and it should be done in a few days if things go well.
It's hard to believe that E3 came out so long ago... seems like just yesterday. I'm really curious as to whether the models will indicate that DRS should be on in E4.
(06-25-2020, 01:28 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 11:49 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
I wouldn't really call it a drug addiction program. The goals are to shut down any psychological, not physical, dependency on a specific type of drug; increase the user's determination to get fully healthy; and increase the person's energy levels. It's too specific to be worth trying to sell, but I have concluded that we could just turn off some script statements and build a program for boosting your energy levels from it. I'm working on it right now, and it should be done in a few days if things go well.
It's hard to believe that E3 came out so long ago... seems like just yesterday. I'm really curious as to whether the models will indicate that DRS should be on in E4.
Oh please let it be on, I don’t think I can do without it ever again.
Shannon, after creating 6g, have you thought about creating a software that will allow users to choose their own end goals, then based on that the software will choose the appropriate modules and start building the sub for the user.
More like custom but at faster rate and affordable for everyone.
(06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
(06-25-2020, 01:37 PM)fab10 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 01:28 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 11:49 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
I wouldn't really call it a drug addiction program. The goals are to shut down any psychological, not physical, dependency on a specific type of drug; increase the user's determination to get fully healthy; and increase the person's energy levels. It's too specific to be worth trying to sell, but I have concluded that we could just turn off some script statements and build a program for boosting your energy levels from it. I'm working on it right now, and it should be done in a few days if things go well.
It's hard to believe that E3 came out so long ago... seems like just yesterday. I'm really curious as to whether the models will indicate that DRS should be on in E4.
Oh please let it be on, I don’t think I can do without it ever again.
LOL I hear ya. It's very likely to be on, given how much the models, and you guys, seem to like it. We shall see. I give it 95%+ odds.
(06-26-2020, 05:16 AM)samba99 Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, after creating 6g, have you thought about creating a software that will allow users to choose their own end goals, then based on that the software will choose the appropriate modules and start building the sub for the user.
More like custom but at faster rate and affordable for everyone.
I have thought about that. But there are some very good reasons why it hasn't happened yet, and may never happen. When certain things change, I'll be looking into it. Otherwise, it would require one or both of two resources that I don't have enough of at the moment, even if I decide I am willing to do it.
(06-26-2020, 07:23 AM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
The models have advised me that in spite of the massive jump in power with OF, I should not transition to the 5.85G moniker yet. So we will be using 5.75G for the time being.
It also seems to be suggesting that LTU6 will be the better choice for first program built, which kind of surprises me. But that answer has not yet been verified.
You guys will know when I know.
(06-26-2020, 09:12 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-26-2020, 07:23 AM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
The models have advised me that in spite of the massive jump in power with OF, I should not transition to the 5.85G moniker yet. So we will be using 5.75G for the time being.
It also seems to be suggesting that LTU6 will be the better choice for first program built, which kind of surprises me. But that answer has not yet been verified.
You guys will know when I know.
Gawd,I HOpe UMS2 will be built first! thats definitely my vote,but if not first then certainly next there after with 5.85 at the helm ,by then!!C'mon UMS2 Train!! w/ FRM 4.9 & DRS!! Yes!!
(06-26-2020, 09:12 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-26-2020, 07:23 AM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
The models have advised me that in spite of the massive jump in power with OF, I should not transition to the 5.85G moniker yet. So we will be using 5.75G for the time being.
It also seems to be suggesting that LTU6 will be the better choice for first program built, which kind of surprises me. But that answer has not yet been verified.
You guys will know when I know.
Have you thought about how OF will work inside LTU6?
Will it "just" be in the form of FRM, or will it have a separate module, which I think would be amazing?
(06-26-2020, 09:54 AM)Hanpan Wrote: [ -> ] (06-26-2020, 09:12 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-26-2020, 07:23 AM)NOMAD Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
The models have advised me that in spite of the massive jump in power with OF, I should not transition to the 5.85G moniker yet. So we will be using 5.75G for the time being.
It also seems to be suggesting that LTU6 will be the better choice for first program built, which kind of surprises me. But that answer has not yet been verified.
You guys will know when I know.
Have you thought about how OF will work inside LTU6?
Will it "just" be in the form of FRM, or will it have a separate module, which I think would be amazing?
I don't think you understand how all this works. OF is FRM 4.9, with a couple of statements that direct it to allow it to function as a stand alone subliminal. FRM is a module in the skeleton script. OF is FRM 4.9, with a goal of removing fear. FRM is a module that seeks to remove the fears that stand in the way of achieving the primary goals of the program.
So I don't have to think of how OF will work inside LTU6, because OF won't be in LTU6 - FRM 4.9 will. And it will be aimed at removing the fears that stand in the way of achieving all of the goals LTU6 has.
"Just" FRM is what makes OF work; it's just being directed back to itself as a main goal for the program. And FRM already is a module in skeleton script.
Hi Shannon.
I remember you said you were working "round robin", and were waiting to make FRM 4.9 before you made DMSI. 4.9 is here. Then you made OF. Now...it seems you're making a drug sub? Also making ANOTHER sub ahead of DMSI now suddenly, a massively detailed multi-stage one that will no doubt take an extremely long time to make? What happened to it being made after FRM 4.9? Are you saying now it's being pushed back by months...again? (This just brings up familiar feelings of the program being backburnered is all...)
(06-26-2020, 09:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 01:37 PM)fab10 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 01:28 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2020, 11:49 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
I wouldn't really call it a drug addiction program. The goals are to shut down any psychological, not physical, dependency on a specific type of drug; increase the user's determination to get fully healthy; and increase the person's energy levels. It's too specific to be worth trying to sell, but I have concluded that we could just turn off some script statements and build a program for boosting your energy levels from it. I'm working on it right now, and it should be done in a few days if things go well.
It's hard to believe that E3 came out so long ago... seems like just yesterday. I'm really curious as to whether the models will indicate that DRS should be on in E4.
Oh please let it be on, I don’t think I can do without it ever again.
LOL I hear ya. It's very likely to be on, given how much the models, and you guys, seem to like it. We shall see. I give it 95%+ odds.
Ive never run DRS before. I wonder it will interact with E4?