What did you think of being able to run AOL at just one loop a day? How did you like AOL?
(04-19-2021, 09:59 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]What did you think of being able to run AOL at just one loop a day? How did you like AOL?
One loop made the whole experience of using the program become subliminal in a way. Thinking way less about everything involved and having way better time management of when and how to listen to it, less over-inflated expectations.
The experience itself is very smooth, very pleasant. And subtle in a good way. It's a good tool to ground myself.
(04-19-2021, 10:31 AM)Raz Wrote: [ -> ] (04-19-2021, 09:59 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]What did you think of being able to run AOL at just one loop a day? How did you like AOL?
One loop made the whole experience of using the program become subliminal in a way. Thinking way less about everything involved and having way better time management of when and how to listen to it, less over-inflated expectations.
The experience itself is very smooth, very pleasant. And subtle in a good way. It's a good tool to ground myself.
I found the same to be true of my experience on one of the dmsi version a few years back on one loop. Seemed to help everything flow so much easier and was my best experience on a sub. Not sure if your like me though in a sense that i had a very controlling father as a child and as a result dont like being told what to do, so i think a part of the effectiveness from one loop/ less overall listening time may come from that as well.
Hi Shannon, hope all is well.
I ran OF V1 for 128 days, then switched to OF V2 as you know. I'm on day 122 of OF V2 now. Been devoted to the OF cause for quite awhile now, especially OF V2 of course.
Is there any chance of releasing OF V3 soon? I tabled this before, because I assumed UMS would take a long long time to create, seems like that's becoming the case. Just thought I'd try for OF V3 again, seeing as it must be a simpler project than UMS, and give you easy income from many of us during this awful time. I'm sure OF V3 would be an instabuy for many, especially now as our options for subs to use for practical effect are quite limited due to this weird situation we're all in. OF V3 would be a great one, especially given how well OF V2 has predictably sold. I knew it'd be a winner. Plus it's an investment in improved future execution of subs, which is fantastic on top of the money generated.
Worst case, I can continue for awhile on OF V2 and then evaluate options then. I know from your journal post you were focusing on DMSI in September, then suddenly it got shelved and we don't know when the next version is supposed to be released anymore. At least OF V3 would be something to keep making momentum in fear removal, and making dollars too, lol. Just a thought.
All the best, hope things are getting better in your neck of the woods, Shannon!
I say keep the focus on UMS2 and get that out the door first. Of course you know the best way to steer this ship.
(04-19-2021, 09:59 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]What did you think of being able to run AOL at just one loop a day? How did you like AOL?
I will wait 7 days before giving you feedback updates on AOL...but it seems I do crave one more loop, and will not experiment until first 7 days passed.
Just 2hrs per day is great, can schedule that and get some sleep
And,I really like that title
(04-20-2021, 05:23 AM)TugaInVegas Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 04:06 AM)UniversalMan Wrote: [ -> ] (04-19-2021, 09:59 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]What did you think of being able to run AOL at just one loop a day? How did you like AOL?
I will wait 7 days before giving you feedback updates on AOL...but it seems I do crave one more loop, and will not experiment until first 7 days passed.
Just 2hrs per day is great, can schedule that and get some sleep
And,I really like that title
I feel the exact same thing... I like it, but always seem to want a little more... just like candy
Exactly, maybe not the whole loop but I would dare to say 3 ASRB (if that is how you call the sub + silence inside one audio)....do not get me wrong I did not say that the models failed here, that is maybe the initial use untill the fears of expressing love are removed....or until the sub builds itself up in the subconcious...so,that means,that is an individual thing, but since starting the sub I have that same thought present in my thoughts.
(If all that helps, what I wrote, I am happy)
(04-20-2021, 12:17 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon, hope all is well.
I ran OF V1 for 128 days, then switched to OF V2 as you know. I'm on day 122 of OF V2 now. Been devoted to the OF cause for quite awhile now, especially OF V2 of course.
Is there any chance of releasing OF V3 soon? I tabled this before, because I assumed UMS would take a long long time to create, seems like that's becoming the case. Just thought I'd try for OF V3 again, seeing as it must be a simpler project than UMS, and give you easy income from many of us during this awful time. I'm sure OF V3 would be an instabuy for many, especially now as our options for subs to use for practical effect are quite limited due to this weird situation we're all in. OF V3 would be a great one, especially given how well OF V2 has predictably sold. I knew it'd be a winner. Plus it's an investment in improved future execution of subs, which is fantastic on top of the money generated.
Worst case, I can continue for awhile on OF V2 and then evaluate options then. I know from your journal post you were focusing on DMSI in September, then suddenly it got shelved and we don't know when the next version is supposed to be released anymore. At least OF V3 would be something to keep making momentum in fear removal, and making dollars too, lol. Just a thought.
All the best, hope things are getting better in your neck of the woods, Shannon!
DMSI never got shelved, it's just been that the methods and ways of doing things have been getting more and more difficult, slow, time consuming. In 5.75.6G or earlier, AOL would have taken about 3 days. It certainly was not three days in 5.75.7G! I've been working on UMS v2 ever since. Some aspects of the massive shift in tech have forced me to literally take time out to learn how to do things all over again in completely new ways, and the trend seems to be, it takes 10-100x longer to do some of these things now. The job I have been working on for 7 days now, used to take me 1-2 hours, for example.
On top of that the models aren't always stable, and I'm dealing with various issues and stupidities in my private life that are slowing me down, distracting me, exhausting me and or preventing me from being as productive as I should be. So I'm doing my best, but UMS v2 in multi-stage in 5.75.7G is a nightmare and I haven't had time to work on DMSI for a bit. It's definitely not shelved. I just have to focus on one thing at a time right now.
OF v3 is something I could do. 5.75.7G could definitely make that an interesting build. Have some ideas how to advance the script at this point, also. But if I get into script adjustment, we may not be looking at a quick build.
Who else would be interested in OF v3? I also have some additional interesting aura programs I could build.
(04-20-2021, 05:37 AM)UniversalMan Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 05:23 AM)TugaInVegas Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 04:06 AM)UniversalMan Wrote: [ -> ] (04-19-2021, 09:59 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]What did you think of being able to run AOL at just one loop a day? How did you like AOL?
I will wait 7 days before giving you feedback updates on AOL...but it seems I do crave one more loop, and will not experiment until first 7 days passed.
Just 2hrs per day is great, can schedule that and get some sleep
And,I really like that title
I feel the exact same thing... I like it, but always seem to want a little more... just like candy
Exactly, maybe not the whole loop but I would dare to say 3 ASRB (if that is how you call the sub + silence inside one audio)....do not get me wrong I did not say that the models failed here, that is maybe the initial use untill the fears of expressing love are removed....or until the sub builds itself up in the subconcious...so,that means,that is an individual thing, but since starting the sub I have that same thought present in my thoughts.
(If all that helps, what I wrote, I am happy)
I don't think the models are wrong. I think that you guys like the way it feels and want more. In this case, that's harmless and if you want more, go for it. But it's important to follow the instructions when a new tech level comes out so we know what it can do before we start experimenting.
No
(04-20-2021, 10:27 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 12:17 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon, hope all is well.
I ran OF V1 for 128 days, then switched to OF V2 as you know. I'm on day 122 of OF V2 now. Been devoted to the OF cause for quite awhile now, especially OF V2 of course.
Is there any chance of releasing OF V3 soon? I tabled this before, because I assumed UMS would take a long long time to create, seems like that's becoming the case. Just thought I'd try for OF V3 again, seeing as it must be a simpler project than UMS, and give you easy income from many of us during this awful time. I'm sure OF V3 would be an instabuy for many, especially now as our options for subs to use for practical effect are quite limited due to this weird situation we're all in. OF V3 would be a great one, especially given how well OF V2 has predictably sold. I knew it'd be a winner. Plus it's an investment in improved future execution of subs, which is fantastic on top of the money generated.
Worst case, I can continue for awhile on OF V2 and then evaluate options then. I know from your journal post you were focusing on DMSI in September, then suddenly it got shelved and we don't know when the next version is supposed to be released anymore. At least OF V3 would be something to keep making momentum in fear removal, and making dollars too, lol. Just a thought.
All the best, hope things are getting better in your neck of the woods, Shannon!
DMSI never got shelved, it's just been that the methods and ways of doing things have been getting more and more difficult, slow, time consuming. In 5.75.6G or earlier, AOL would have taken about 3 days. It certainly was not three days in 5.75.7G! I've been working on UMS v2 ever since. Some aspects of the massive shift in tech have forced me to literally take time out to learn how to do things all over again in completely new ways, and the trend seems to be, it takes 10-100x longer to do some of these things now. The job I have been working on for 7 days now, used to take me 1-2 hours, for example.
On top of that the models aren't always stable, and I'm dealing with various issues and stupidities in my private life that are slowing me down, distracting me, exhausting me and or preventing me from being as productive as I should be. So I'm doing my best, but UMS v2 in multi-stage in 5.75.7G is a nightmare and I haven't had time to work on DMSI for a bit. It's definitely not shelved. I just have to focus on one thing at a time right now.
OF v3 is something I could do. 5.75.7G could definitely make that an interesting build. Have some ideas how to advance the script at this point, also. But if I get into script adjustment, we may not be looking at a quick build.
Who else would be interested in OF v3? I also have some additional interesting aura programs I could build.
@
Shannon
I am interested in OF v3. I finish E4 in a month (last week of May) and would insta buy OF v3.
(04-20-2021, 10:29 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 05:37 AM)UniversalMan Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 05:23 AM)TugaInVegas Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 04:06 AM)UniversalMan Wrote: [ -> ] (04-19-2021, 09:59 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]What did you think of being able to run AOL at just one loop a day? How did you like AOL?
I will wait 7 days before giving you feedback updates on AOL...but it seems I do crave one more loop, and will not experiment until first 7 days passed.
Just 2hrs per day is great, can schedule that and get some sleep
And,I really like that title
I feel the exact same thing... I like it, but always seem to want a little more... just like candy
Exactly, maybe not the whole loop but I would dare to say 3 ASRB (if that is how you call the sub + silence inside one audio)....do not get me wrong I did not say that the models failed here, that is maybe the initial use untill the fears of expressing love are removed....or until the sub builds itself up in the subconcious...so,that means,that is an individual thing, but since starting the sub I have that same thought present in my thoughts.
(If all that helps, what I wrote, I am happy)
I don't think the models are wrong. I think that you guys like the way it feels and want more. In this case, that's harmless and if you want more, go for it. But it's important to follow the instructions when a new tech level comes out so we know what it can do before we start experimenting.
I will give it few more days at one loop,just to be sure what it does at one loop
Btw did you give it a ride @
Shannon
I would spend money on OF v3 if the build decreases the minimum amount of months required to run it(for example, 8 months to 6 months or something). I already have OF V2 and purchasing another version of it would be a little redundant for me.
(04-20-2021, 10:42 AM)UniversalMan Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 10:29 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 05:37 AM)UniversalMan Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 05:23 AM)TugaInVegas Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2021, 04:06 AM)UniversalMan Wrote: [ -> ]I will wait 7 days before giving you feedback updates on AOL...but it seems I do crave one more loop, and will not experiment until first 7 days passed.
Just 2hrs per day is great, can schedule that and get some sleep
And,I really like that title
I feel the exact same thing... I like it, but always seem to want a little more... just like candy
Exactly, maybe not the whole loop but I would dare to say 3 ASRB (if that is how you call the sub + silence inside one audio)....do not get me wrong I did not say that the models failed here, that is maybe the initial use untill the fears of expressing love are removed....or until the sub builds itself up in the subconcious...so,that means,that is an individual thing, but since starting the sub I have that same thought present in my thoughts.
(If all that helps, what I wrote, I am happy)
I don't think the models are wrong. I think that you guys like the way it feels and want more. In this case, that's harmless and if you want more, go for it. But it's important to follow the instructions when a new tech level comes out so we know what it can do before we start experimenting.
I will give it few more days at one loop,just to be sure what it does at one loop
Btw did you give it a ride @Shannon
I turned it on this morning, at the suggestion of my advisor, in response to a deep depression GF fell into yesterday which was being helped by nothing. She just layed in bed and sobbed for hours yesterday and nothing I did or played helped. In 23 minutes, she did a complete 180 in response to AOL, and has stayed happy, loving a productive ever since. I am floored.
I am currently projecting an aura of love that I can physically feel.