(07-15-2020, 09:55 AM)guyinlahore Wrote: [ -> ][
The Universal Healing program is basically going to be designed to trigger healing mentally, emotionally, and physically, all at once.
Will the universal healing program be a replacement for EHS and MHS combined. Will it be in 5.75g or in 6g?
[/quote]
It will be aimed at healing "everything at once". It will not replace those programs, because not everyone wants or needs to "heal everything at once". Remember that a jack of all trades is a master of none; specialized solutions are better at their goals than generalized solutions. If you only want to heal physically, then MHS is a better choice than Universal Healing. If you only want to heal emotionally, then EHPRA is a better solution. But in some cases, Universal Healing will be a better solution.
I don't know when it will be built, so I can't answer that question about what generation it will be built in.
(07-15-2020, 10:01 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon.
Are you planning on releasing stage 1 of LTU and then moving onto DMSI? Or doing the ENTIRE LTU first before moving onto DMSI? Because, based off your words of 3-4 weeks for LTU, I don't see how all of LTU can be done in such a time frame. Seems like it'd take like months or something, especially since it's now going to be a multi-stage.
Just wanted to hear about the process for that, thanks a lot Shannon.
The original idea was to build Stage 1 and then move to something else, and then I quickly realized that would not work. It may take me longer than a month to build whatever comes next. So I plan to build between 2 and all stages of LTUv6 before I move on. Most likely 2-3 and then I will move to something else.
DMSI is in place to be that something else. I'm really looking forward to seeing how some of the changes I'm going to make play out.
My original estimate that it would take 3-4 weeks was for script work. Not building. That estimate comes from the fact that nothing can be added in terms of new titles, so what can be done us upgrading the skeleton script and optimizing the existing titles. It may be that that estimate is too low. I don't know. Take it as a minimum. You know how these things tend to go by now.
I'll be working as quickly as possible, but as always, correctness is above speed.
(07-15-2020, 12:27 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-15-2020, 10:01 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon.
Are you planning on releasing stage 1 of LTU and then moving onto DMSI? Or doing the ENTIRE LTU first before moving onto DMSI? Because, based off your words of 3-4 weeks for LTU, I don't see how all of LTU can be done in such a time frame. Seems like it'd take like months or something, especially since it's now going to be a multi-stage.
Just wanted to hear about the process for that, thanks a lot Shannon.
The original idea was to build Stage 1 and then move to something else, and then I quickly realized that would not work. It may take me longer than a month to build whatever comes next. So I plan to build between 2 and all stages of LTUv6 before I move on. Most likely 2-3 and then I will move to something else.
DMSI is in place to be that something else. I'm really looking forward to seeing how some of the changes I'm going to make play out.
My original estimate that it would take 3-4 weeks was for script work. Not building. That estimate comes from the fact that nothing can be added in terms of new titles, so what can be done us upgrading the skeleton script and optimizing the existing titles. It may be that that estimate is too low. I don't know. Take it as a minimum. You know how these things tend to go by now.
I'll be working as quickly as possible, but as always, correctness is above speed.
Wow so UMS2 gets pushed back even further now ,now that,DMSI is NEXT...coming up?,.I thot that UMS2 was next after LTU,or even in between the other levels of LTU?....there was also mention if it came down to it , of 'round robin'ing the three or at least the two LTU & UMS2...guess we'll see what comes out in the wash ,as the ole saying goes....shrugs, shoulders.
If fear is all that it is, its inevitable that through OF 5.75g, FRM 5.0 is going to happen aswell as 6g. Im 100% on board with this idea. It came to me since 2 days, so im expecting TID and im down with it.
Hi @
Shannon
I’ve been feeling the urge to play OF all day or at least the majority of the day- while on my “on” days and then keeping the same 3 days off
Should I follow this urge or is this a form of resistance?
@
Shannon
For example last night was my last day on and I played the ultrasonic for what was at least 10 or 11 loops and at the higher volume that you suggested earlier (13/16 on iPhone) and this led to me having dreams that brought me back to high school which I found to be very interesting
Hi @
Shannon. I'm on day 6 of the first OF cycle. I'm using the hybrid tracks to play my loops while I sleep. Surprisingly, my energy levels are not all that different than before I started this program. I have increased the number of loops to match the number of hours I sleep at night (8-9 hours) so I don't have to wake up specifically to turn the program off before my normal wake time. (I have the tracks on a constant loop).
On a couple of occasions I woke up with feelings of satisfaction that you get after doing something productive.
I have been more emotionally sensitive lately and little (and big) things not going right for me are quick to trigger feelings of anger and sadness inside of me. I even cried on couple of occasions because of this. But I typically bounce back the next day. This is not something new to me, but it has been happening more frequently over the last couple of weeks.
At the same time as @
KingDavid93 has mentioned I've been wanting to run even more loops to "keep the pressure up" as you mentioned. There's also the option to reduce my days off. I was wondering if it is okay for me to do this as long as I am not getting deeply exhausted by this.
Also, the 8 month run value has been calculated with the ultrasonic track in mind. Can running the hybrid track affect this value keeping in mind that the hybrid track essentially doubles the amount of input? Or is the pace at which the subconscious does work not affected by the type of track that's used?
Thanks!
(07-15-2020, 02:27 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: [ -> ] (07-15-2020, 12:27 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-15-2020, 10:01 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon.
Are you planning on releasing stage 1 of LTU and then moving onto DMSI? Or doing the ENTIRE LTU first before moving onto DMSI? Because, based off your words of 3-4 weeks for LTU, I don't see how all of LTU can be done in such a time frame. Seems like it'd take like months or something, especially since it's now going to be a multi-stage.
Just wanted to hear about the process for that, thanks a lot Shannon.
The original idea was to build Stage 1 and then move to something else, and then I quickly realized that would not work. It may take me longer than a month to build whatever comes next. So I plan to build between 2 and all stages of LTUv6 before I move on. Most likely 2-3 and then I will move to something else.
DMSI is in place to be that something else. I'm really looking forward to seeing how some of the changes I'm going to make play out.
My original estimate that it would take 3-4 weeks was for script work. Not building. That estimate comes from the fact that nothing can be added in terms of new titles, so what can be done us upgrading the skeleton script and optimizing the existing titles. It may be that that estimate is too low. I don't know. Take it as a minimum. You know how these things tend to go by now.
I'll be working as quickly as possible, but as always, correctness is above speed.
Wow so UMS2 gets pushed back even further now ,now that,DMSI is NEXT...coming up?,.I thot that UMS2 was next after LTU,or even in between the other levels of LTU?....there was also mention if it came down to it , of 'round robin'ing the three or at least the two LTU & UMS2...guess we'll see what comes out in the wash ,as the ole saying goes....shrugs, shoulders.
The plan was always to build those three programs and find a balance between them. The decision was made that DMSI would be the second program built to balance things financially, and then I decided to build LTU6 first. That puts UMS last.
Round Robin isn't working recently... it would triple the amount of time it takes to accomplish anything, instead of really being helpful in the way I need.
There is no pleasing everyone right now, unfortunately, so I'm going to do what is the best way forward.
(07-16-2020, 06:16 AM)KingDavid93 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon
I’ve been feeling the urge to play OF all day or at least the majority of the day- while on my “on” days and then keeping the same 3 days off
Should I follow this urge or is this a form of resistance?
It's usually a form of resistance if the urge is to play less, not more. If you want to do more, try it and see what happens.
@
Shannon
Also a side note not sure if this was mentioned already- but is frm 4.9 like e3 in the sense that it is a more gentle approach to getting rid of fears- or is it more reminiscent of how you’d like to create e4 to be which you’ve stated you’d like to make more aggressive yet safe...
(07-16-2020, 06:18 AM)KingDavid93 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
For example last night was my last day on and I played the ultrasonic for what was at least 10 or 11 loops and at the higher volume that you suggested earlier (13/16 on iPhone) and this led to me having dreams that brought me back to high school which I found to be very interesting
I suggested 13/15 on Android, which is 14/16 on iPhone.
I really hope this doesn't backfire for you in terms of exhaustion, because I am in awe of how exhausted I have been the last three days.
(07-16-2020, 10:58 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2020, 06:18 AM)KingDavid93 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
For example last night was my last day on and I played the ultrasonic for what was at least 10 or 11 loops and at the higher volume that you suggested earlier (13/16 on iPhone) and this led to me having dreams that brought me back to high school which I found to be very interesting
I suggested 13/15 on Android, which is 14/16 on iPhone.
I really hope this doesn't backfire for you in terms of exhaustion, because I am in awe of how exhausted I have been the last three days.
I will let you know if I feel exhausted at all
(07-16-2020, 08:47 AM)Hatman Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon. I'm on day 6 of the first OF cycle. I'm using the hybrid tracks to play my loops while I sleep. Surprisingly, my energy levels are not all that different than before I started this program. I have increased the number of loops to match the number of hours I sleep at night (8-9 hours) so I don't have to wake up specifically to turn the program off before my normal wake time. (I have the tracks on a constant loop).
On a couple of occasions I woke up with feelings of satisfaction that you get after doing something productive.
I have been more emotionally sensitive lately and little (and big) things not going right for me are quick to trigger feelings of anger and sadness inside of me. I even cried on couple of occasions because of this. But I typically bounce back the next day. This is not something new to me, but it has been happening more frequently over the last couple of weeks.
At the same time as @KingDavid93 has mentioned I've been wanting to run even more loops to "keep the pressure up" as you mentioned. There's also the option to reduce my days off. I was wondering if it is okay for me to do this as long as I am not getting deeply exhausted by this.
Well I mean, you've already thrown the instructions out the window, why stop now? lol
Quote:Also, the 8 month run value has been calculated with the ultrasonic track in mind. Can running the hybrid track affect this value keeping in mind that the hybrid track essentially doubles the amount of input? Or is the pace at which the subconscious does work not affected by the type of track that's used?
Thanks!
The 8 month value was calculated for the program, not a specific format.