(05-01-2020, 04:18 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (05-01-2020, 04:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (05-01-2020, 02:09 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
How is your work into FRM 4.9 going? I am looking forward to seeing how it works in the next several programs.
Also will E4 be 5.75G or 6G? I recall you saying the former but I can’t find the specific post here on the forum.
I'm still in my "a few days off" after MIR v3. I will be starting work either tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, depending on certain variables.
It is possible that E4 will be 6G but most likely 5.75G.
@Shannon
Oh ok. Well I hope you enjoy your time off.
I really like E3 so I am very much looking forward to E4 when it does drop.
Does this mean that E4 will be published soon?
(05-02-2020, 04:57 AM)Lowe Wrote: [ -> ]Dear Shannon,
First post in a while so I am out of the loop, I just have one question: how is it looking with a new US/LM in the future? Are you planning to make it in the near future?
If I remember correctly, US/LM worked for some, but for some others it gives mixed results. Then version 4 came out but I didn't see people reporting results, so another version was mooted. This was a couple of years ago, are there any updates? I would want to give it another try, I'm sure many others would too.
Thanks.
I will begin working on USLM 4.2 tomorrow, actually. For some people, V3 works better and for some V4.x works better. I believe I have tracked down the issue, and I will be releasing USLM 4.2 in the not too distant future.
(05-02-2020, 06:28 AM)fab10 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-01-2020, 04:18 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (05-01-2020, 04:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (05-01-2020, 02:09 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
How is your work into FRM 4.9 going? I am looking forward to seeing how it works in the next several programs.
Also will E4 be 5.75G or 6G? I recall you saying the former but I can’t find the specific post here on the forum.
I'm still in my "a few days off" after MIR v3. I will be starting work either tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, depending on certain variables.
It is possible that E4 will be 6G but most likely 5.75G.
@Shannon
Oh ok. Well I hope you enjoy your time off.
I really like E3 so I am very much looking forward to E4 when it does drop.
Does this mean that E4 will be published soon?
I can make it, but it's going to have to wait for a while. I have other things in queue right now.
Sounds like a plan
Btw @
Shannon what's going to be in USLM4.2? Frm 4.8? Any shields?
Also is this going to be a even better version with more power or just more stability so it can work?
Thanks in advanced
(05-02-2020, 10:30 AM)LiquidMind Wrote: [ -> ]Sounds like a plan
Btw @Shannon what's going to be in USLM4.2? Frm 4.8? Any shields?
Also is this going to be a even better version with more power or just more stability so it can work?
Thanks in advanced
USLM 4.2 is intended to primarily correct the issues with v4.1. FRM will either be turned off, 4.8 or 4.9 depending on specifics. I think it's unlikely to vbe 4.8 if it's turned on. If it has a shield, which seems likely, it will probably be DRS. Again, these things will be determined by the models. Finally, it will be based on the latest skeleton script, having the new script additions.
(10-05-2019, 03:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The challenge for us is that we sell a product that most providers of financing will not accept, from our experience so far. We have looked into that. We have considered trying to offer subscriptions, streaming the product on-demand, financing, etc. There does not at this time seem to be a very good option for us to do those things.
Furthermore, unless I am mistaken, you generally don't see things like financing options for a luxury product. They also don't go on sale.
I'm still figuring out what we will be doing in the end, but part of what I want to do is offer everything in 6G and basically have a unified and consistent product offering, instead of a patchwork of products scattered all over the place technology wise confusing our customers as to whether or not we actually do offer the best products on the market.
In case you are willing to share, I wonder, what was the problem with a streaming or subscription model? Would it be more feasible now that streaming technology has grown? (Netflix...) It would be fantastic from a user’s point of view - I would subscribe to LTU5 right now if the option was available, but dropping 1K+ is not easy for most people, even if the product is well worth the money. It would be even more interesting for new users who do not necessarily know whether the product would work for them or not.
With prices going up (for the good reasons you explained) and the economy going down, some alternative solution could be win-win.
(05-02-2020, 02:14 PM)fab10 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-05-2019, 03:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The challenge for us is that we sell a product that most providers of financing will not accept, from our experience so far. We have looked into that. We have considered trying to offer subscriptions, streaming the product on-demand, financing, etc. There does not at this time seem to be a very good option for us to do those things.
Furthermore, unless I am mistaken, you generally don't see things like financing options for a luxury product. They also don't go on sale.
I'm still figuring out what we will be doing in the end, but part of what I want to do is offer everything in 6G and basically have a unified and consistent product offering, instead of a patchwork of products scattered all over the place technology wise confusing our customers as to whether or not we actually do offer the best products on the market.
In case you are willing to share, I wonder, what was the problem with a streaming or subscription model? Would it be more feasible now that streaming technology has grown? (Netflix...) It would be fantastic from a user’s point of view - I would subscribe to LTU5 right now if the option was available, but dropping 1K+ is not easy for most people, even if the product is well worth the money. It would be even more interesting for new users who do not necessarily know whether the product would work for them or not.
With prices going up (for the good reasons you explained) and the economy going down, some alternative solution could be win-win.
Streaming, so far, has been a risk of piracy and we haven't found a good way to do it. I don't know how we would do anything like Netflix, or if that would even bee feasible.
Subscription models, we cannot find a solution provider that works, and again, piracy.
We periodically look again and see what we can see, but at this time, the only thing I can think of is something involving something likea patreon account, and I don't know how we would make even that work.
(05-02-2020, 02:29 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (05-02-2020, 02:14 PM)fab10 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-05-2019, 03:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The challenge for us is that we sell a product that most providers of financing will not accept, from our experience so far. We have looked into that. We have considered trying to offer subscriptions, streaming the product on-demand, financing, etc. There does not at this time seem to be a very good option for us to do those things.
Furthermore, unless I am mistaken, you generally don't see things like financing options for a luxury product. They also don't go on sale.
I'm still figuring out what we will be doing in the end, but part of what I want to do is offer everything in 6G and basically have a unified and consistent product offering, instead of a patchwork of products scattered all over the place technology wise confusing our customers as to whether or not we actually do offer the best products on the market.
In case you are willing to share, I wonder, what was the problem with a streaming or subscription model? Would it be more feasible now that streaming technology has grown? (Netflix...) It would be fantastic from a user’s point of view - I would subscribe to LTU5 right now if the option was available, but dropping 1K+ is not easy for most people, even if the product is well worth the money. It would be even more interesting for new users who do not necessarily know whether the product would work for them or not.
With prices going up (for the good reasons you explained) and the economy going down, some alternative solution could be win-win.
Streaming, so far, has been a risk of piracy and we haven't found a good way to do it. I don't know how we would do anything like Netflix, or if that would even bee feasible.
Subscription models, we cannot find a solution provider that works, and again, piracy.
We periodically look again and see what we can see, but at this time, the only thing I can think of is something involving something likea patreon account, and I don't know how we would make even that work.
I know there are iOS apps that offer meditations with a subscription model. I would think that’s relatively easy to implement and safe for piracy. Apple would take a cut of course.
(05-02-2020, 02:35 PM)fab10 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-02-2020, 02:29 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (05-02-2020, 02:14 PM)fab10 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-05-2019, 03:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The challenge for us is that we sell a product that most providers of financing will not accept, from our experience so far. We have looked into that. We have considered trying to offer subscriptions, streaming the product on-demand, financing, etc. There does not at this time seem to be a very good option for us to do those things.
Furthermore, unless I am mistaken, you generally don't see things like financing options for a luxury product. They also don't go on sale.
I'm still figuring out what we will be doing in the end, but part of what I want to do is offer everything in 6G and basically have a unified and consistent product offering, instead of a patchwork of products scattered all over the place technology wise confusing our customers as to whether or not we actually do offer the best products on the market.
In case you are willing to share, I wonder, what was the problem with a streaming or subscription model? Would it be more feasible now that streaming technology has grown? (Netflix...) It would be fantastic from a user’s point of view - I would subscribe to LTU5 right now if the option was available, but dropping 1K+ is not easy for most people, even if the product is well worth the money. It would be even more interesting for new users who do not necessarily know whether the product would work for them or not.
With prices going up (for the good reasons you explained) and the economy going down, some alternative solution could be win-win.
Streaming, so far, has been a risk of piracy and we haven't found a good way to do it. I don't know how we would do anything like Netflix, or if that would even bee feasible.
Subscription models, we cannot find a solution provider that works, and again, piracy.
We periodically look again and see what we can see, but at this time, the only thing I can think of is something involving something likea patreon account, and I don't know how we would make even that work.
I know there are iOS apps that offer meditations with a subscription model. I would think that’s relatively easy to implement and safe for piracy. Apple would take a cut of course.
For an iOS or Android app, we have to develop the app. Right now that is not feasible. The whole world is crumbling at the moment, unfortunately, and we have to wait for better circumstances.
(05-02-2020, 01:49 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (05-02-2020, 10:30 AM)LiquidMind Wrote: [ -> ]Sounds like a plan
Btw @Shannon what's going to be in USLM4.2? Frm 4.8? Any shields?
Also is this going to be a even better version with more power or just more stability so it can work?
Thanks in advanced
USLM 4.2 is intended to primarily correct the issues with v4.1. FRM will either be turned off, 4.8 or 4.9 depending on specifics. I think it's unlikely to vbe 4.8 if it's turned on. If it has a shield, which seems likely, it will probably be DRS. Again, these things will be determined by the models. Finally, it will be based on the latest skeleton script, having the new script additions.
@
Shannon
Will these changes in 4.2 allow the user to manifest faster?
(05-02-2020, 03:18 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (05-02-2020, 01:49 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (05-02-2020, 10:30 AM)LiquidMind Wrote: [ -> ]Sounds like a plan
Btw @Shannon what's going to be in USLM4.2? Frm 4.8? Any shields?
Also is this going to be a even better version with more power or just more stability so it can work?
Thanks in advanced
USLM 4.2 is intended to primarily correct the issues with v4.1. FRM will either be turned off, 4.8 or 4.9 depending on specifics. I think it's unlikely to vbe 4.8 if it's turned on. If it has a shield, which seems likely, it will probably be DRS. Again, these things will be determined by the models. Finally, it will be based on the latest skeleton script, having the new script additions.
@Shannon
Will these changes in 4.2 allow the user to manifest faster?
Potentially, but it will depend on how well they are being executed.
@
Shannon
Hi how are you,
Why would there even be a chance that frm would not be included in USLM 4.2, let alone it not being updated to 4.9+?
Also if you were trying to test how effective it will be with the frm turned on or off- then why not include two versions one with it on and one with it off?