(05-27-2024, 08:06 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (05-27-2024, 04:11 PM)geotrouvetout Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon and @Benjamin I suscribed to Optimal physical healing. There is a problem with the file, it stops every 10 seconds for few seconds. I check if the problem is on my side,but it does not seem. Thanks !
I don't see any issues on our end. Ben, do you see anything?
Which file(s) have you tried? What checks have you done?
It's unusual you have this all of a sudden. As you've streamed multiple other programs right? Are you using the same device as before? Have you tried other browsers or devices? Could it be something with your connection?
As if it was an issue from here then multiple people would be reporting it.
(05-29-2024, 05:13 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ] (05-27-2024, 08:06 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I don't see any issues on our end. Ben, do you see anything?
Which file(s) have you tried? What checks have you done?
It's unusual you have this all of a sudden. As you've streamed multiple other programs right? Are you using the same device as before? Have you tried other browsers or devices? Could it be something with your connection?
As if it was an issue from here then multiple people would be reporting it.
@
Benjamin Yes it is the first time and I have ran files for a long time with no problems with the same browser
Did you try the other browsers as suggested? Or clear cache? As I said if it was from our end multiple people would be reporting it.
@
Shannon
I’m thinking of extending my OGSF2 run past the standard 6 months. How long can I go before you recommend moving on to something else?
Edit: Also, do you think it’s a waste of time to use EPHRA6 if I’m only going to use it for a few months?
(05-28-2024, 08:12 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Hello, @Shannon !
Congrats on the release of OPHv2. Maybe this program can help for Arthritis? This new module sounds intriguing. I wonder what the future holds for it.
I'm curious, since it's been a little while now since release, have we had any information on how MEv3 is performing? I don't believe I've seen any journals on it yet, so I wanted to reach out.
Also, have you reached a decision on X4A-2000? I am VERY interested in it, but I'd need more info on how the process for it has gone, reports, and options to acquire it etc. I've been intrigued with what you've mentioned in previous journal entries. Just wanted to hear more about it.
Thank you for your time, Shannon. It sounds like you're continuing to make great progress towards 6G. Congratulations to you.
I believe it definitely has the potential to help with arthritis, but of course I don't currently have any testers who have arthritis, so I cannot say definitively just yet.
I have had no feedback on MEv3.
X4A-2000 has been in testing for I think the last 3 months now. Testing is ongoing for two reasons:
- We have only two people who can test it, and both are seriously involved in LTRs they want to keep, so both of them are the worst possible option for testing this program to see how it would respond to being used by the actual intended audience (guys who are free to actually respond to interested women). This is why it's taking so long. However, our only tester suitable for testing these won't be able to test until August, and testing will be over by then.
- We are - in spite of all of the testers' efforts to resist the program and sabotage the responders - STILL seeing very impressive results, although not quite the testing goals yet. This is why we will continue testing. I believe that in spite of everything that has gone wrong or been done to shut down results or whatever else, we will achieve the testing goals within the next 30 to 60 days. And given how bad the circumstances are with regard to the options available to us for people to test it, and how much is working against our success in achieving the program's testing goals, the fact that we are seeing impressive results regardless just blows my mind.
Testing has come
very close to achieving the testing parameters on five separate occasions so far. In each case, the tester was forced to shut the woman down just before the test goal would have been achieved in order to prevent her from getting fired, cheating on her first date with someone else, causing a bar fight or some other similar situation. We take moral, ethical and legal considerations very seriously when testing these things. However, while these repeated situations give me strong confidence that X4A-2000 works and can and will achieve the design goal, I'm not going to charge Premium prices until we have at least one tester make it to that final step and achieve the testing goal outright. I am confident we can achieve the goal, so I have authorized testing to continue through June and even through July if necessary. Sorry it's taking so long, but testing this thing has been damned difficult given the circumstances and the limitations we face in doing so. My testers have strict instructions to shut down any situation that is not ethical, moral or legal.
Beyond that, I cannot say anything else about X4A-2000 or testing, except that I am thoroughly impressed with what it has accomplished in spite of a virtual avalanche of things working against it.
Thank you for the congratulations, but we're not there yet. I'm looking forward to eating a big old smoked tomahawk ribeye steak when I finish developing 6G. I'm working on it as I can.
(06-03-2024, 01:06 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
I’m thinking of extending my OGSF2 run past the standard 6 months. How long can I go before you recommend moving on to something else?
Edit: Also, do you think it’s a waste of time to use EPHRA6 if I’m only going to use it for a few months?
At the end of the instructions for how to use it, you'll see the number of months to use it that constitutes one run-through. You're welcome to use it for as many run-throughs as you like, but try to use it for that much time per run-through to get the best results. Basically, you can use it as long as you like, provided that you're still getting execution and not having subconscious boredom shut it down.
It's not a waste of time to use EHPRAv6 for a few months, but you should try to follow the instructions I talked about earlier concerning a single run-through.
(05-31-2024, 09:28 PM)geotrouvetout Wrote: [ -> ] (05-29-2024, 05:13 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]It's unusual you have this all of a sudden. As you've streamed multiple other programs right? Are you using the same device as before? Have you tried other browsers or devices? Could it be something with your connection?
As if it was an issue from here then multiple people would be reporting it.
@Benjamin Yes it is the first time and I have ran files for a long time with no problems with the same browser
So what browser are you using that now has an issue, and what other browsers have you tried?
Have you tried different devices to play it on?
How about different operating systems?
Have you tried rebooting the device, updating it, scanning for viruses and malware?
Have you attempted to use an entirely different location for Internet access? Does your router need a reset, for example?
(06-03-2024, 07:49 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-03-2024, 01:06 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
I’m thinking of extending my OGSF2 run past the standard 6 months. How long can I go before you recommend moving on to something else?
Edit: Also, do you think it’s a waste of time to use EPHRA6 if I’m only going to use it for a few months?
At the end of the instructions for how to use it, you'll see the number of months to use it that constitutes one run-through. You're welcome to use it for as many run-throughs as you like, but try to use it for that much time per run-through to get the best results. Basically, you can use it as long as you like, provided that you're still getting execution and not having subconscious boredom shut it down.
It's not a waste of time to use EHPRAv6 for a few months, but you should try to follow the instructions I talked about earlier concerning a single run-through.
Are you basically saying to treat the instructed amount of time like a minimum and if I want to do more I can? Or are you saying to stick to the instructed time as rigidly as possible and that I can go over it if I want but I’ll get diminishing returns?
(06-03-2024, 08:07 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ] (06-03-2024, 07:49 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]At the end of the instructions for how to use it, you'll see the number of months to use it that constitutes one run-through. You're welcome to use it for as many run-throughs as you like, but try to use it for that much time per run-through to get the best results. Basically, you can use it as long as you like, provided that you're still getting execution and not having subconscious boredom shut it down.
It's not a waste of time to use EHPRAv6 for a few months, but you should try to follow the instructions I talked about earlier concerning a single run-through.
Are you basically saying to treat the instructed amount of time like a minimum and if I want to do more I can? Or are you saying to stick to the instructed time as rigidly as possible and that I can go over it if I want but I’ll get diminishing returns?
I am saying that one run-through should be the amount of months specified in the instructions to achieve the best results. If you want to do more, then do another full run-through at a time for the best results. The only exception is to combat subconscious boredom.
(06-03-2024, 10:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-03-2024, 08:07 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Are you basically saying to treat the instructed amount of time like a minimum and if I want to do more I can? Or are you saying to stick to the instructed time as rigidly as possible and that I can go over it if I want but I’ll get diminishing returns?
I am saying that one run-through should be the amount of months specified in the instructions to achieve the best results. If you want to do more, then do another full run-through at a time for the best results. The only exception is to combat subconscious boredom.
Okay glad I got verification. I suppose that means I’ll be moving on to EPHRA6.
Thank you for the advice and thank you for making these experiences public and for everyone to use. My OGSF2 results are crazy inspiring to me and I almost feel like I’m in a dream with the results I’m seeing. Keep doing awesome work!
@
Shannon is self esteem still going to be built next?
How do we know if we're subconsciously bored?
Also, it seems like a good candidate for an info/FAQ post, if it means going against instructions on some of the longer run-throughs.
(06-04-2024, 01:52 AM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ] (06-03-2024, 10:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I am saying that one run-through should be the amount of months specified in the instructions to achieve the best results. If you want to do more, then do another full run-through at a time for the best results. The only exception is to combat subconscious boredom.
Okay glad I got verification. I suppose that means I’ll be moving on to EPHRA6.
Thank you for the advice and thank you for making these experiences public and for everyone to use. My OGSF2 results are crazy inspiring to me and I almost feel like I’m in a dream with the results I’m seeing. Keep doing awesome work!
You're welcome. Maybe write up a review or a post about your experiences in the appropriate section? That would help others find the program as well.
(06-04-2024, 06:04 AM)HD87 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon is self esteem still going to be built next?
I've got a few ideas for what to build next. Self Esteem is one of them, but it's not going to be just "self esteem", if I choose that one it'll be more in-depth than that, but will include self esteem.
Unfortunately at the moment I find myself needing to deal with some medical debts from the last accident, so I have to focus on what will make the most money for this month coming up. But no matter what, the program that has self esteem in it is coming very soon, because I've been trying to get that built for a while. What I build will be decided by what the models tell me will produce the best profits for this month's release.