Subliminal Talk

Yes, there was a typo, Sarge. I went back and corrected it. It should have read that women (or the "Affected") SHOULD absolutely act on impulse, not shouldn't. The USER should be patient.

(09-28-2017, 12:15 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, there was a typo, Sarge. I went back and corrected it. It should have read that women (or the "Affected") SHOULD absolutely act on impulse, not shouldn't. The USER should be patient.

Agreed!

*Thunderous applause*

I agree about alleviating the snipers. They should target any person of the gender I find sexually attractive, without any more restriction. The anti-sniper too need some work. I'm for completely removing it and letting the user bearing his responsibility, like any other adult.

Quote:I am planning to try to add some scripting for causing the expression of one's primary gender identity to be expressed in whatever ways are sexually attractive to the gender you prefer to have sex with, as well as focusing you in that presence. So for example, if you identify as masculine, it would enhance your expression of masculinity.

This is neat. Really neat Shannon.

Quote:Increased sexual abundance mindset from current level. Know, without doubt, that any attractive person of the sex you're attracted to (that you actually want) feels they absolutely MUST have sex with you, as much as you allow them to, as soon as possible!

Hell yeah I think this one is really needed.
The user should know, believe and feel deep down that he is abundan with the opposite sex, that this is how it is supposed to be and how it is.

Quote:*Create "flirtation is a fun, enjoyable game" programming.
*Increase care-free/happy-go-lucky/playful sense of humor, relaxed/come-what-may/"love life" attitude.
*Manifest people, places, and experiences for "pure fun & enjoyment," especially if it supports achievement of the goals of the program. Everyone would agree (unless you're just a downer-type) that "fun" people are attractive people. Downer/negative types need this the most!

These are really good too.

Quote:Another problem is the IDGAF is SO high, I literally don't care to ask anyone about themselves. There's a chick standing there, and I'm attracted? Oh, well...as far as I'm concerned, she's just a life-support system for a pussy. That's not cool. These are people, and I should feel like connecting. Sex is a connection. We gotta start facilitating the human connection with DMSI. I should care about the people, but not the outcome. I should want the outcome, but not be attached to it. I should expect the outcome, because, well, fuckin' DMSI.

In my case the IDGAF is so high that I don't even have the need to nor the motivation to go after women.
Seriously I had to force myself on the last date I had and I was just thinking about going back at home as quickly as possible and do something more productive then faking the wanting to know more about that girl just to fuck her.
The interest in women is just too low in my case while on DMSI. Idk if that's how if it's really how I am or if it's my subC resisting.
Well that's something that can be overcome consciously but that'd be neat if DMSI gives a playfull / fun attitude toward the opposite sex.
So that we do not meet women just to have sex with them but more to enjoy the connection and have a good time.

Quote:Where's the celeb effect?

Yeah I was wondering about that too really.
We need a chaisma module. And a real baseline sexy aura that doesn't target anyone, but that is "just here". Overall the feeling of sexiness, charisma, and the attraction should just "be", and not targeted at anyone. - That's my opinion.
The lion is just a lion, everytime and everywhere, no matter what. He's not just a lion for a targeted slice of fellow.

Agree with you on the "general attraction" Plouf.


This caught my eye tho:

(09-28-2017, 01:17 PM)Plouf Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:I am planning to try to add some scripting for causing the expression of one's primary gender identity to be expressed in whatever ways are sexually attractive to the gender you prefer to have sex with, as well as focusing you in that presence. So for example, if you identify as masculine, it would enhance your expression of masculinity.

This is neat. Really neat Shannon.

Yes, very neat.

Forgive me for being weird (I just like to explore all the angles).

WHAT IF: you identify as a female, are anatomically male, but want to have sex with females? How would that all work?

(09-28-2017, 01:36 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]Agree with you on the "general attraction" Plouf.


This caught my eye tho:

(09-28-2017, 01:17 PM)Plouf Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:I am planning to try to add some scripting for causing the expression of one's primary gender identity to be expressed in whatever ways are sexually attractive to the gender you prefer to have sex with, as well as focusing you in that presence. So for example, if you identify as masculine, it would enhance your expression of masculinity.

This is neat. Really neat Shannon.

Yes, very neat.

Forgive me for being weird (I just like to explore all the angles).

WHAT IF: you identify as a female, are anatomically male, but want to have sex with females? How would that all work?

Hahaha, in this case I am also weird because I have had similar thoughts as we don't know what's going on subconsciously.

Quote:Hahaha, in this case I am also weird because I have had similar thoughts as we don't know what's going on subconsciously.

Man, you're not alone. Maybe I'm paranoid but I feel like my subC and I don't have the same definition of "Person of the sex I find sexually attracted". Consciously I think "Women". And subconsciously who knows... ?
That's why I am afraid of the anti-sniper too.

Lol, this is crazy! I thought I was alone in that. I'm so glad I'm not. XD

All the more reason for why we need a "seduce women" sub. It gets rid of all the confusion.

(09-28-2017, 01:45 PM)Plouf Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:Hahaha, in this case I am also weird because I have had similar thoughts as we don't know what's going on subconsciously.

Man, you're not alone. Maybe I'm paranoid but I feel like my subC and I don't have the same definition of "Person of the sex I find sexually attracted". Consciously I think "Women". And subconsciously who knows... ?
That's why I am afraid of the anti-sniper too.

Interesting that you have concerns about the target scripting. My concerns were more about self-identity and I am not so afraid about the target scripting.

I have a lot of concerns about it. For instance with the "sexually attractive" part.
Given how low my libido is right now and how I have close to 0 interest in women, what if there is just no sexually attractive person to target ?
The first thoughts when I see a girl I like is "Oh, she's cute/beautiful", not "OMGZ Ima bang her she's so fucking hot".
See where I'm coming ?
Well maybe I'm just thinking too much about it, but it makes sense really...

(09-28-2017, 02:06 PM)Plouf Wrote: [ -> ]I have a lot of concerns about it. For instance with the "sexually attractive" part.
Given how low my libido is right now and how I have close to 0 interest in women, what if there is just no sexually attractive person to target ?
The first thoughts when I see a girl I like is "Oh, she's cute/beautiful", not "OMGZ Ima bang her she's so ***** hot".
See where I'm coming ?
Well maybe I'm just thinking too much about it, but it makes sense really...

Yers that makes sense to me too. And what if you are attracted to her later? If the snipers only work when BOTH are sexually attracted to each other, well, how hard is that to have happen unless you already know and hang out with each other?

DMSI should keep pushing each party together till they're f*cking.

But I thought Shannon had something like that in it already.

(09-28-2017, 01:36 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]Agree with you on the "general attraction" Plouf.


This caught my eye tho:

(09-28-2017, 01:17 PM)Plouf Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:I am planning to try to add some scripting for causing the expression of one's primary gender identity to be expressed in whatever ways are sexually attractive to the gender you prefer to have sex with, as well as focusing you in that presence. So for example, if you identify as masculine, it would enhance your expression of masculinity.

This is neat. Really neat Shannon.

Yes, very neat.

Forgive me for being weird (I just like to explore all the angles).

WHAT IF: you identify as a female, are anatomically male, but want to have sex with females? How would that all work?

Nix that idea then.

(09-28-2017, 02:06 PM)Plouf Wrote: [ -> ]I have a lot of concerns about it. For instance with the "sexually attractive" part.
Given how low my libido is right now and how I have close to 0 interest in women, what if there is just no sexually attractive person to target ?
The first thoughts when I see a girl I like is "Oh, she's cute/beautiful", not "OMGZ Ima bang her she's so ***** hot".
See where I'm coming ?
Well maybe I'm just thinking too much about it, but it makes sense really...

Ok, I think I get this. Like there are no "persons of the gender you are attracted to". I still think it is a mix of increasing IDGAF and the anti-snipers working too hard, but who knows.

(09-28-2017, 02:16 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]If the snipers only work when BOTH are sexually attracted to each other

I never knew that. Where did you read that affected side ALSO has to be attracted for the sniper to fire?

(09-28-2017, 03:48 PM)Choice Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-28-2017, 02:16 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]If the snipers only work when BOTH are sexually attracted to each other

I never knew that. Where did you read that affected side ALSO has to be attracted for the sniper to fire?

Mr. Anderson quote it from Shannon somewhere.

Perhaps Shannon can enlighten us.