Shannon, on my twenty something day of stage 2 of the AM2011.Had a really weird dream last night and since I listen to the program while sleeping I'm wondering if having the dream may be a side effect of my subconscious working through the issue related to the dream?
Hi James,
Yeah this program brings up alot of strange dreams. I've noticed different patterns each stage where for that whole stage I will have similar dreams where usually some of the things change by the end of the stage. Have you noticed that yet?
I definately feel it is working through stuff in your dreams. I know with other programs where i've seen the scripts it says "I now use my dreams at night to... (whatever)".
Last night while in bed all this intense fear come up, I wasn't fully asleep or fully awake, it was strange, I could kind of feel and see myself in my bed but was in a altered state.
And after that left I fell asleep fully and had a dream that was pretty negative and weird and woke up with more fear.
I can see it working through certain fears. And see this as a way of letting stuff go.
-Ben
(06-02-2011, 02:47 PM)JamesC71 Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, on my twenty something day of stage 2 of the AM2011.Had a really weird dream last night and since I listen to the program while sleeping I'm wondering if having the dream may be a side effect of my subconscious working through the issue related to the dream?
It's common to have dreams as a result of my subliminals, particularly since 4G now actively and intentionally uses your dreams to help process the programming.
The other day, a woman I am seeing said something to me that kind of surprised me. She said something to the effect of "that's a big part of why I like you, you don't let your ego get to you." She was talking about how she didn't like Leo men, but she likes me a lot.
I am liking that the alpha set has balanced my ego at this point, but I sometimes wonder if it's not overbalanced, and I should be more outgoing, overtly dominant and leading more. I find lately I am frequently in situations where I will defer to others as a way of being polite, and if they don't take the lead, I'll do so. But I'm wondering if the politeness programming and ego balancing are not working together to make the results less than they should be for automatic leadership. I've made note of this for when I create AM2012. Anyone else seeing this sort of thing in Stage 5?
I am a week into stage five, if I see no or weak leadership in an area I am in then I assume the role. That is only if I want to be involved. I have noticed I give the group/person a few options (not sure if that conflicts with a leadership role). My opinions are definitely carrying more weight.
Shannon, I have a suggestion in regards to ultrasonic and masked volume setting. Release in the free area or with each sub purchase a short audible mp3 at a “representative volume” as they are in the ultrasonic and masked recording. The listener could set the volume with this audible mp3. It would be very easy for someone to determine the volume is way too loud, too soft, or is heard in an adjacent room. The same could apply to the masked. If you are able to hear the audible in the masked volume audible then you will be able to hear it with the masked version. The audible could be male and or female and could give the instruction on how to properly set the volume. With this the user of the sub has the confidence that the volume level is correct.
(06-03-2011, 01:24 PM)AwesomeYoungDude Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, I have a suggestion in regards to ultrasonic and masked volume setting. Release in the free area or with each sub purchase a short audible mp3 at a “representative volume” as they are in the ultrasonic and masked recording. The listener could set the volume with this audible mp3. It would be very easy for someone to determine the volume is way too loud, too soft, or is heard in an adjacent room. The same could apply to the masked. If you are able to hear the audible in the masked volume audible then you will be able to hear it with the masked version. The audible could be male and or female and could give the instruction on how to properly set the volume. With this the user of the sub has the confidence that the volume level is correct.
How is this necessary when you can use any audio that can be heard to do the same thing? I'm confused.
I'm working on getting back into the swing of things after this last month. May hit me kind of hard because of both my deceased mother's birthday and Mother's day, so I decided to sort of go with the flow and let my emotions lead me. I think I needed the time to sort of find myself as the healing is passing, and I am discovering new things that were not available to me previously.
Now I'm working actively again, and I have a lot of work to do. I've got to get some behind-the-scenes things dealt with, and the Alpha Female program has to be completed. There are 12 or more programs in queue for upgrade to 4g or building for this month, so I should be busy. And hopefully, we'll see a lot of stuff get done this month!
Thanks for bearing with me.
(06-02-2011, 09:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The other day, a woman I am seeing said something to me that kind of surprised me. She said something to the effect of "that's a big part of why I like you, you don't let your ego get to you." She was talking about how she didn't like Leo men, but she likes me a lot.
I am liking that the alpha set has balanced my ego at this point, but I sometimes wonder if it's not overbalanced, and I should be more outgoing, overtly dominant and leading more. I find lately I am frequently in situations where I will defer to others as a way of being polite, and if they don't take the lead, I'll do so. But I'm wondering if the politeness programming and ego balancing are not working together to make the results less than they should be for automatic leadership. I've made note of this for when I create AM2012. Anyone else seeing this sort of thing in Stage 5?
I've noticed I've become more of a subtle leader. So I can definitely relate to taking the lead only if others don't. I honestly think it's a good balance right now. I've been around dominant people who lead all the time and they can get annoying at times. I think most people tend to gravitate towards the calm charismatic guy that doesn't take things too seriously, but at the same time can be a leader. That might just be me and my laid back personality though. I'm actually content with not being the leader all the time because I think it helps with my perfectionist mentality and realizing that others are sometimes better suited to take on the task instead of me.
I guess it really depends what you want. My idea of an alpha male has changed drastically since the beginning of this set. But I like it because that humbleness is what gives me peace of mind, it's that quiet confidence and internal knowing that you can handle things but you aren't a loudmouth about it.
I would have to agree. After letting Alpha Male set in I've actually become more of a leader.
Shannon, I'm interested in using Improve Your Grades & Study Habits in perhaps a month (or two). I was wondering if the phrases that involve "straight A's" don't delude the subconscious when you partake in a different method of grading? My grading systems consists of EC's (European Credits) so trying to get an A+ would be somewhat redundant over here...
(06-11-2011, 02:08 PM)Jay Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, I'm interested in using Improve Your Grades & Study Habits in perhaps a month (or two). I was wondering if the phrases that involve "straight A's" don't delude the subconscious when you partake in a different method of grading? My grading systems consists of EC's (European Credits) so trying to get an A+ would be somewhat redundant over here...
That is certainly a valid point. I'll have to make some changes.
‘kay. So you’re saying that in its current format it wouldn’t be safe to use?
First off, my apologies to all. In the process of growing a rose I've thrust its thorns on many.
Shannon, I could use a better understanding of "confidence in masculine core". Can you give my your definition of what characteristic this entail. I learn best with the use of examples, real or created in order to illustrate the point. Note: I will most likely dwell on this topic for a little while until I have a clear picture. I expect that if you are not able to or preferred not to respond that you will indicate so.
AYD