Shannon's Journal Discussion

[chaosvrgn]

What's the verdict, we getting it tonight? Gotta be in bed soon. Really early and long day tomorrow.

[RTBoss]

What's the verdict, we getting it tonight? Gotta be in bed soon. Really early and long day tomorrow.

This old man's hitting the hay.

I'll try and run some day loops tomorrow. Last night I had some cool residual dreams from 2.4, maybe I'll have a few more.

Night yall.

[Shannon]

What's the verdict, we getting it tonight? Gotta be in bed soon. Really early and long day tomorrow.

I started modeling the energy sourcing scripting and found out two things.

1. The current sourcing effectively rolls a natural 1 on D20 and is therefore critical miss and a massive FAIL for long term success of the program, and
2. more than 90% of what I have tested so far has also failed.

I haven't even started building it yet, though, because when I realized (1) above, all available focus and energy and time went to correcting this issue. This is a critical factor, so I'm going to devote whatever time is necessary to fixing it NOW.

Good news is, I have a very promising multi-threaded multi-sourced solution at hand. Bad news is, implementing it properly will require at least another hour of calculations, and I also need to eat. I estimate the program will take at least 6 hours to build once I start. So... unfortunately, no. Not today my friend. We must correct this issue, and I will make sure it is corrected to the best of my ability instead of rushing this out the door.

[Bookstacks DC737]

Definitely take your time Shannon, I'd rather have another great quality program than something that's just rushed out. Thanks for communicating this, now I can go ahead and sleep without having to check back here every 5 minutes

[chaosvrgn]

Yeah, it's probably for the best anyway. I have A LOT of work to do in the morning and it's probably not wise for me to test a new subliminal considering how pivotal tomorrow's tasks are to my future.

Anyway, thanks!

[Shannon]

Just FYI: The new energy sourcing script does not directly specify using body fat. Some of those options were somewhat effective, but none of them stood very long during modeling.

[Benjamin]

1. The current sourcing effectively rolls a natural 1 on D20 and is therefore critical miss and a massive FAIL for long term success of the program, and
2. more than 90% of what I have tested so far has also failed.

Is this the energy sourcing in 2.4 or something you had in mind for 2.5 that didn't work out in the tests?

[Shannon]

The energy sourcing in 2.4 was calculated for too short term a time span. It won't work in the long run. I found something that will. It actually should not only provide multiple simultaneous sources of energy for the program, but more powerful ones as well.

[Shannon]

Ok, off to go eat and enjoy my female. I will be back in a few hours to work on this some more.

[wolverine_i_am]

No rush, Shannon. Definitely take your time. Plus it gives me more chance to keep gong with 2.4, as I'm not done with the healing / clearing yet.

[Raykon]

No rush, Shannon. Definitely take your time. Plus it gives me more chance to keep gong with 2.4, as I'm not done with the healing / clearing yet.

I'm on the same page. This is the first DMSI version I haven't been that eager to change programs. I'm really liking the much needed healing I've had from 2.4.

[apollolux]

Hm. I was kind of looking forward to fat-burning being the first energy source in the cascade. Oh well.

[Shannon]

Hm. I was kind of looking forward to fat-burning being the first energy source in the cascade. Oh well.

Fat burning is not specified, but it is also not prevented. If your subconscious concludes it would make a good source of energy, it can use fat.

[Shawn]

I started modeling the energy sourcing scripting and found out two things.

1. The current sourcing effectively rolls a natural 1 on D20 and is therefore critical miss and a massive FAIL for long term success of the program, and
2. more than 90% of what I have tested so far has also failed.

I haven't even started building it yet, though, because when I realized (1) above, all available focus and energy and time went to correcting this issue. This is a critical factor, so I'm going to devote whatever time is necessary to fixing it NOW.

Good news is, I have a very promising multi-threaded multi-sourced solution at hand. Bad news is, implementing it properly will require at least another hour of calculations, and I also need to eat. I estimate the program will take at least 6 hours to build once I start. So... unfortunately, no. Not today my friend. We must correct this issue, and I will make sure it is corrected to the best of my ability instead of rushing this out the door.

Now, as you are also changing the energy source, do you consider a 2.5 healing-on-version some time after taking vacation? I am asking because initially you didn't want to change anything but the healing to have better comparison. But now, as several things changed and you found out that 2.4 energy source isn't effective in long term anyway this would also serve you to get the difference between healing-on and healing-off version. And the delayed release of the healing version would give you some data of the non-healing version first.