08-19-2016, 11:44 AM
(08-19-2016, 10:32 AM)maxx55 Wrote:(08-19-2016, 08:46 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: There is two things I dislike about DMSI. It's the goal phrasing for getting sex & the gender neutral thing ( towards every person of the gender I am attracted to thing ).
The original Aura Of Sexiness could already be used by anybody of any sexual orientation. It was already gender neutral. It said on the website : " This title can be used by either gender, and can be used successfully by anyone of any sexual orientation. " AOS was already gender neutral. No need to make it gender neutral, the thing is gender neutral already. I think it makes the sub less effective cause The original AOS was effective as **** without it. You can check the testimonial section for testimonials of AOS.
Next is the goal phrasing. You can get the sex indirectly by working on the aura. Remember how frenchmagnet got sex with 70% of the beautiful women he knew in a group. The goal phrasing should be about building the hottest, sexiest & most alluring aura of irresistible sexiness possible not on getting sex. I think focusing on trying to get sex, makes it less effective. Anyways thats my 2 cent. What do you guys think.
If at any point Shannon thinks a focus on the aura would yield better and more blatant results then by all means he should change the goal of the program and start over again.
I just think 2.3 and 2.4 will probably show whether the goal has the right aim or not.
I think he should focus on the aura. Developing the aura is what this program is all about.