08-16-2016, 05:34 PM
(08-16-2016, 05:27 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(08-16-2016, 05:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-16-2016, 05:20 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(08-16-2016, 04:27 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-16-2016, 01:19 PM)Sash Wrote: You shouldn't release another dmsi update unless you actually get laid with a few attractive girls which you haven't from your journals. Your journals and only full of iois and kept saying you could have banged some but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. You should have never released this product if you yourself haven't gotten laid from it.
P in the V is the only IOI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well, I guess we have to listen to Sash on this one. No more updates or releases to DMSI until I get P in the V. A few different times. With girls he finds attractive. (Not women, of course, they're probably too old for his taste.) After all, my journal is only full of IOIs and I kept saying I could have banged her but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. I should have never released this product If I myself haven't gotten laid from it.
Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify.
In the mean time, guys, sucks to be you. It'll be a few months. Maybe. Might take longer. Can't release 2.3 or 2.4 now, obviously.
I can't tell if your being sarcastic or serious here.
It's awesome that you believe that 3.0 will definitely accomplish the design goals. That's exciting! And it's great that you will thoroughly test the program to get it where you and your customers want it to be. However, if you do keep the testing exclusive to people who aren't apart of this forum, please use just as varied a sample size as what is currently on the forum. Like some users haven't had results yet like CatMan and Swisston, while others like Minititan have had at least 1 experience that is exactly what we're aiming for. As long as there's variety in the testers, the data should be accurate for an idea of final release results.
See my post above that you missed.
I do not believe 3.0 will definitely achieve the design goals. I believe it is most likely going to - but we may have to do 3.1, 2, etc. to work out kinks, and maybe even 4.x.
But I am about 98% sure that in the end, we will succeed. Otherwise I would not be willing to put in all this time, and effort, and give away free upgrades all over the place in the process.
I was a bit slow posting from my smartphone.
I would totally enjoy being a part of the DMSI testing myself, but I gotta finish E2. I think making the testing open like this was the best way to go about getting the necessary data for tweaking and refining the sub so it'll succeed. It just seems like maybe the next time (if you ever do it again), you should have a few pages with the words "BETA TESTING" covering them. It seems like a lot of people didn't take the necessary time to read that it's experimental before purchasing.
I do believe it says that on the product description page...
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!