(10-21-2016, 05:50 PM)PDjunkie Wrote: Reminds me of characters like Roosh who display various clearly conflicting beliefs. On the one hand only praising the traditional morality of monogamy, nuclear families, non extra-marrital affairs, early marriage. On the other hand expressing disdain for 99% of the female population and encouraging pornography and behaviour which goes against his ideal beliefs. Can't be healthy to have those battles going on internally; it prevents growth IMO. Just a thought.
I will check out that link
Absolutely! Great insight, I've shared that as well.
I like Roosh, he has a lot of good info to wake up naive blue pillers. I learned a lot. But quickly, I realised that the info there was very compartmentalised and limited, and you had these rigid concepts that didn't seem flexible to grow with and develop, it felt very stifled and dehumanising to both genders. They seemed to contradict to me, too. I feel their anger and resentment towards women were things I didn't want, I went through that phase after having my eyes opened up, listening to Tom Leykis etc., then I wanted more and was able to let go of a lot of anger and resentment and "I'll make "them" pay!" feelings.
He definitely has a place, and I'm glad he is around to wake men up, as is Tom Leykis. But, as I've said to others before, you learn some stuff there, get educated on how things are, but then you have to move on or you end up becoming a hate movement just like feminism has become.
"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." -Harvey Dent
