(05-30-2016, 05:13 PM)FrostedFake Wrote:(05-30-2016, 04:53 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Bottom line, it's your life, do what you want. If it's true that 1 hour of 5.5G is comparable to 6 hours of 5G listening time, 90 days is like a year and a half of a 5G single stage program. That's crazy! So even a month is a lot of good programming.
So you're telling me that if I did AM in 5.5G that would be like running AM6 6 times? Holy shit, not to overhype anything but if that's actually true just imagine 6G. If 6g is even twice as powerful as 5.5 g that's like running AM6 and SM3 12 times each. That's 12 years of using AM6 and SM3. And I'm pretty sure 6g will be many times more powerful than 5.5g. If this lives up to the hype we are in a golden age. I severly hope this isn't all hype because then it's like a dream come true.
Gonna keep my expectations low though so I won't be let down.
I wasn't even that excited for 6g but if it's really as good as it's being hyped up to be then this shit is going to be crazy.
5.5G is, on average, the equivalent of 6.5 times the amount of exposure per unit of time that 5G is.
6G is several times that again. I don't have a way to really quantify it, because it is effectively infinite, and I don't know definitively how close to infinite input the mind can actually handle. I just know that it works.
I know that I can get people doing things with 6G in second and minutes that took hours and days in the 5G power range. We still haven't achieved the "full out goal achievement in 20 minutes flat" yet, but it's coming. This I know for sure. It just has to be worked out how to do that in discreet steps, which I discover with each failure by studying how and why it failed. Every failure is another step to success. It's coming.
How 6G will work for standard programming types and goals, I don't fully know yet. But it should be much faster, much more powerful and much less usage time.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!