Subliminal Talk

(03-25-2017, 05:30 PM)Sickologist Wrote: [ -> ]I don't have a lot of issues to deal with, that's been taken care of long ago. There's literally no negative crap stored in my mind to prevent me from achieving my goals. Feel free to think otherwise, but I know myself better than anyone.

It's easy to think that, but the subconscious is a very different world. You'd be getting full results if you were clear, like you say you are, and running B.

Quote:It seemed to me that version B was the compromise for the people who didn't want to get involved in the healing/clearing.

B is not a compromise. B is the script without healing. It's for when you've gotten cleared of enough crap to be able to execute the script without having something resist or sabotage. And it will only work when you don't resist or sabotage.

Quote:FYI, I didn't have any negativity using these subs and I was executing the script as my original post indicates. My point was simply that I prefer the results I had on DAOS over DMSI. That's my personal choice and you did in fact blow it out of proportion.

We will have to agree to disagree, but I'm not interested in arguing.

Quote:To say "play lawyer games all you want" means that you're taking the moral highground and expect me to argumentative, but guess what? I won't. We both know what happened here. And there's no logic errors to anything I've said here.

You make me laugh sometimes, Sick. Have fun with doing it your way, man.

(03-25-2017, 05:32 PM)Sickologist Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-25-2017, 05:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]By the way, Sick, don't make the mistake of thinking I am singling you out - it wasn't just you engaging in the logic errors. You just provided the easiest example to point out.

...and condescending

You know what they say about opinions.

(03-25-2017, 05:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]By the way, Sick, don't make the mistake of thinking I am singling you out - it wasn't just you engaging in the logic errors. You just provided the easiest example to point out.

Logical errors, no, what was discussed was experience while using. You cannot call exactly how something hits reality it can differ. No matter how logical.

This is blown out of proportion, the proof is in your posts and that of chaos.

(03-25-2017, 06:17 PM)Darkness Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-25-2017, 05:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]By the way, Sick, don't make the mistake of thinking I am singling you out - it wasn't just you engaging in the logic errors. You just provided the easiest example to point out.

Logical errors, no, what was discussed was experience while using. You cannot call exactly how something hits reality it can differ. No matter how logical.

This is blown out of proportion, the proof is in your posts and that of chaos.

Logically, people who commit logic errors do so because they don't comprehend that they are doing so in the first place.

That's not what was being discussed

(03-25-2017, 07:27 PM)Darkness Wrote: [ -> ]That's not what was being discussed

Nice try, but that is what was being discussed. Faulty logic. People who commit logic errors do so because they don't know they're doing it. Which is why they think they are being logical, when they're not.

In the end, you guys are going to be welcome to use DAOS or DMSI or whatever else. Just don't go knocking DMSI if you're not using it correctly, and if you are using it correctly, keep reporting so I can know what needs work.

But don't start thinking that just because you aren't getting the results you want with DMSI that its design is faulty or that we need to go back to the good old days of 4G. That's faulty thinking. The reason we had the good old days of 5G and then I spent the last year and a half working on 5.5G is because in the good old days of 4G, it was easy to make stuff, but it wasn't very effective.

Likewise, a partially cut diamond won't be something that refracts light correctly in all viewing angles.

DMSI's design is good and uses sound logic in all phases of construction. I have yet to fully understand what all I am working with, how the resistance works, and how to deal with it. But that does not mean the current design for 5.5G/6G skeleton script, or DMSI, is somehow inferior to an 8 year old 4G program. That thinking is so ridiculous it's laughable.

There are only two reasons anyone would be running DAOS when DMSI is available. One is, they can't handle DMSI. The other is, they like DAOS because of the price and/or simplicity with regards to what it accomplishes for them. Some are here for the former; some are here for the latter. The former is just the running away I was talking about. The latter, well, generally if you have a copy of DMSI, you won't be using DAOS without being a run away type.

And once again... all the complaining about how DAOS is better than DMSI only makes sense if DMSI matters to you, and it would not matter to you if it really didn't work, or you didn't have a copy, and were running away from it.

I don't care if you (as in any of you, not one particular person) use DAOS. I do care if you (again, as in any of you, not one particular person) are trashing a program that makes DAOS look ridiculous in comparison because you don't like that you can't handle what it's demanding from you in order to get the results.

That's not helping me make DMSI better. The goal of public testing and you agreeing to be a tester by buying DMSI was to help me make it better - not attack my intelligence or my work. When DMSI 3.x final comes out, then you're welcome to attack DMSI all you like as long as you have a genuine and valid point. But attacking DMSI while choosing an 8 year old 4G progenitor of DMSI because you think it's better is not just ridiculous, it's... running away.

(03-25-2017, 07:16 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-25-2017, 06:17 PM)Darkness Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-25-2017, 05:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]By the way, Sick, don't make the mistake of thinking I am singling you out - it wasn't just you engaging in the logic errors. You just provided the easiest example to point out.

Logical errors, no, what was discussed was experience while using. You cannot call exactly how something hits reality it can differ. No matter how logical.

This is blown out of proportion, the proof is in your posts and that of chaos.

Logically, people who commit logic errors do so because they don't comprehend that they are doing so in the first place.

Well, what are you doing here then?

I've been saying I don't like DMSI which is very different from claiming it doesn't work, but again you're beating a dead horse.

I don't need "long distance snipers" or have women approach me to get laid. Same way I don't need the Batmobile to get to and back from work.

You cannot force me to praise the way DMSI goes about attracting women.

I could say that everybody who are using DMSI are running away, they rely on the sub instead of their balls to get laid. But you know what? I won't. Its my philosophy that the man initiates and the woman follows, whenever it didn't happen that way in my life, things went straight to hell.

It's not in my place to lecture other people how to do things.

As for logical errors, you've made 2 huge one's.
1. Saying that I claimed DMSI doesn't work
2. Claiming that I'm running away

What I've said is that DAOS is more suitable for me and my goals. I also said I had better results without DMSI or any sub than I had with 3.0 or 3.1. I trust my own experiences and mindset more than I do your logic, Shannon.

What's interesting here is that those who are hellbent on defending DMSI are typically those who never ran DAOS. What's also interesting is that the same people seem incapable of considering my points here, it's like they're skimming through my post and think "what?!! this asswipe says DMSI doesn't work?!!" Why so defensive? Yeah, I know why.

Day 6

Anxiety, panic and strong hangover mindfog. Fell almost asleep.

Am thinking about how far I can go in being sexually agressive, entitled and dominant. Will be a nice experiment. In ways I feel that its all background stuff. I want to go full blown intent as of now. To much caring, to less playing. Its a open field. Fuck morals. Use whatever works for me. Having arranged a date for today but the communication is just down right off. Bring on the abundance. Never give over frame.

Been thinking about investment again. As I remember the NGAF and flowing, I miss something about it now. Why goes my mind in overdrive and shutdown. Its not to high standards as I realize now, rather something internal being dealt with. Like, I can pull it off and again. If surrendering it all goes to hell. Set frame, control, guide and close. Always be closing and not giving a f#ck.

The steps are downright easy. I now understand the non-logics to it. The more primal one that impregnates her mind and eventually all. To much side shit is counter productive to me. I feel downright direct in this. Seems to be rejection issues. To liberate and release this will set me free. Its like a part of me keeps it so safe as a defense mechanism. "You can play it normal" its f#cking retarded.

I get the impression, Sickologist, that you are content with the person you've shaped yourself to be. You want an edge, without changing anything else, hence not wishing to run the healing/clearing to achieve the goals of the newer/latest versions of the program. Like you said, you're not comfortable being chased - you would prefer to be the aggressor.

This is pretty simple, you aren't interested in the program goal. So you use DAOS 4G - a simple, straight-forward script that gives you the edge you seek without changing anything you currently value about yourself.

I will say, for my part, that I've run DAOS, but not for long, as I got very little out of it and found it to be quite boring. Chalk me up for not being patient with it, I guess. I've run it for over a month in the past, with little-to-no result. I am interested in all the changes DMSI has to offer, and so far, I have received changes in spades, and in ways I never expected. So, for myself, I choose DMSI. It is far superior - for my preferences, goals, and values.

Thinking about commanding presence, hand of g*d stuff. also, to much consideration of her frame. just went back from my girl, and yes I say, my girl as it is, nothing is sidetracking me, no blow out exist. just spike her, be this guy. Its like I only hear blablabla, and it doesnt register, only my frame exists in this, which is a huge realisation for me. When I kissed her at the trainstation, I noticed I was not commanding enough, not leading enough for some reason, yet at the same time, im feeling very rampant in this, like, there is nothing that went wrong, which means solidifying. Oblivion is right at times in that.

No impression and validation seeking. starting to realize masculine intent about this, shes female, Im male and thats about it. no shame in my owning of myself, my interests and hobbies.

I now recognize that at the station when kissing her an she went in, I was to much leaning at times to go for the kiss, it just looked pretty lower value in that. she didnt hold eye contact which could be her insecurity, even if the kiss went well. I expect eye contact. Being centred and grounded. there could be ASd and LMR going on, which I suspect myself, just plow through, just flip the script, flip it over. when being asked if being nervoue ( which I wasnt, I want higher energy and feeling lethargic for some reason, to much zen and present/aloof (?)) which was interpretated or shittested, IDK. Amplify and ridicule "Im fucking nervous"with being playfull and smirk on my face. there is no blow out at all, even if it was an ridiculous chase. At the start I had some thoughts going on like "Im to available, to chasing"only to flip it to laughign about it.

story telling is next what I want. the not existing of her really sticks right now, barrage and trance her out. lol

Also, micro-subcommunication. Dont get in your head. Micro communication like laughing when the purse holding shit comes up. Be amused and dont give into that shit. Struck like lightning as to why in the past this stuff happened. Weak frame. Frame theory falls away.

Don't mean to derail your journal again Kol, my apologies but

(03-26-2017, 06:51 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]I get the impression, Sickologist, that you are content with the person you've shaped yourself to be. You want an edge, without changing anything else, hence not wishing to run the healing/clearing to achieve the goals of the newer/latest versions of the program. Like you said, you're not comfortable being chased - you would prefer to be the aggressor.

This is pretty simple, you aren't interested in the program goal. So you use DAOS 4G - a simple, straight-forward script that gives you the edge you seek without changing anything you currently value about yourself.

I will say, for my part, that I've run DAOS, but not for long, as I got very little out of it and found it to be quite boring. Chalk me up for not being patient with it, I guess. I've run it for over a month in the past, with little-to-no result. I am interested in all the changes DMSI has to offer, and so far, I have received changes in spades, and in ways I never expected. So, for myself, I choose DMSI. It is far superior - for my preferences, goals, and values.

So RTB would you say that listening to DOAS long enough according to the instructions wouldn't give these guys life changes? Or is that determined on how much conscious effort your put into the goal. Obviously the better technology wins but it seems to be that whoever cooperates with whichever program benefits more. Again, no doubt DMSI is better. But we can't knock the guys that finds a valid way that works for them. Or can we? isn't listening to subs about seeing changes in life and ourselves. That's the reason and relevance of the power of technology. Well in my experience atleast. Noticed the sub makes changes to the mindset, others react differently to your behaviour. Success is a result from intention. Boom. There's a testimonial.

Back to you Kol

RT just nailed it. That's exactly what I've been trying to say. I said DMSI hasn't yielded the results or should I say in the way that I want it to be. And I clearly said in my original post that I can only speak for myself.

Which simply boils down to; I'm not interested in healing or having females trying to seduce me. That's what DMSI is about, I'm not.

When I look at the type of story telling I resonate with, the main guy is always flawed, imbalanced, yet he is irresistible to women. I believe that male and female dynamics should be based on the man being the messed up one while the woman is desperate to change him into something he's not. You'll see this in so many movies, I believe the basis for this is an inherent blend of nurturing and masochistic behavior from females. They also melt when they behold the cocky and charming kid on the playground. The way I see it, there's little intrigue to a perfectly healed man who's making all the seemingly right moves. It's okay to be human and go off the rails from time to time. That's my prerogative. If you see things differently, that's cool. The world would be boring if everybody was alike. Let me finish this by saying I sleep very comfortable at night knowing they write Taylor Swift songs about guys like me.

(03-26-2017, 08:17 AM)Ultrasonic King Wrote: [ -> ]So RTB would you say that listening to DOAS long enough according to the instructions wouldn't give these guys life changes?

It can, but that's not the goal of DAOS and therefore shouldn't be expected. If it does happen it's the effects from DAOS but not caused by it.
The goal of DAOS is as simple as creating an aura of sexiness.

The goal of DMSI is to "Develop Maximum Sexual Irresistibility", that does not only mean Aura.

This includes, but is not limited to: Your personality, Your Lifestyle and "Attractive Behavior".

Your personality is your beliefs and actions, any belief that derails you of your "sexiness" will get removed and a healthier/sexier belief will take its place, and as your beliefs change so will your actions as well.

"Your lifestyle" is kinda concluded in itself don't you think? But what you do day-to-day and things like that. If your subconscious thinks you need more money in order to become sexually attractive, it will get you more money.

Your attractive behavior could be concluded anything that you do that can make you more attractive such as humor, body language, conversational skills, physicality. But it's obviously not limited to these things. This is just the top of my head.

These are some of the things DMSI is doing. And then I haven't mentioned the snipers, auric shield, the aura itself and whatever more is in DMSI that we don't even know.

With all these things, there are SO MUCH MORE to resist, which means we won't get results instantly. Nor should someone expect to go from homeless to a millionaire in a matter of 30 days. And the fact that this is a product under TESTING.

DMSI is my first product from IML, and I am astonished by the results from simply listening to an audio tape a few hours a day.

You guys are worried about "more complex equals more to resist". That would be a problem, if the design wasn't what it is. In 5G and higher, more complex is designed to cause it to automatically increase in power. That's the only way to counter "more complex is more to resist". So in the end, that complexity is what is allowing it to work as well as it does, and will be what allows it to eventually overcome the resistance entirely for the majority of people in 3.x final.