11-01-2019, 09:02 AM
(11-01-2019, 07:42 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote:(11-01-2019, 07:29 AM)Shannon Wrote: Gentlemen... you are sitting here discussing how discussing karma is a violation of Rule 4, and then hoping we won't get upset.
Keep it up and I will give you both some time off personally.
Whoah! Sorry Shannon! I didn't know that warning people ABOUT violation of rule 4 WAS a violation of rule 4! I just intended to warn him because I mafe the mistake of talking about karma once and that was met with a warning. I just wanted to warn him not to get himself in trouble accidentally. That's all I was trying to do, because I realized I myself had made you guys rather angry and syarted taking it more seriously. I wasn't trying to start a discussion on it. And I didn't think warning someone ABOUT rule 4 would be in violation OF rule 4. My apologies.
If talking about "karma" is a Rule 4 violation, and you're sitting here talking about how "talking about karma is a rule 4 violation", then YOU ARE BREAKING RULE 4.
"Warning people ABOUT violation of rule 4" isn't a violation of rule 4 unless you're breaking the rule while you do it.
Stop. I'm getting tired of the "dancing around rule 4" bullshit some of you are pulling trying to get around it.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!