Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

Hey Shannon, I asked you this in my journal but I figure I might catch you here. It's been a while since I've run AM and I'm thinking it would do me some good. I only have 5.0 at the moment, haven't been able to buy 6 yet. Having said that I'm taking a break from E2. What's your opinion on 5.0? I can't remember where you stood on it because 5.0 was supposed to be the last one. Anyway it was either that or ASC. I'm leaning more towards ASC to see if maybe it can help me land a better job and then from there buy AM6. But I wanted to know your opinion. Especially since I've grown so accustomed to the 5G tech.

I would not recommend 5.0 if you can afford 6.0, but not because it benefits me in any particular way; rather, it's because the advancement of technology is such that one is many times better than the other. Regardless of whatever anyone stuck on the "no pain, no gain" bullshit may say or think.

If you have 5.0 and you can't afford 6.0, 5.0 is better than ASC. But I would go for 6.0 if you can.

[chaosvrgn]

I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.

I may be game. Any testing protocol or anything you're looking for in particular?

[Shannon]

I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.

I may be game. Any testing protocol or anything you're looking for in particular?

I don't really remember if we were doing a specific number of loops of V1. If we were, do that.

If not... well, I don't know what to tell you for how many loops to use it for... maybe use it for the same number of loops as 2.5 gets?

[Duke.Togo]

I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.

I may be game. Any testing protocol or anything you're looking for in particular?

I don't really remember if we were doing a specific number of loops of V1. If we were, do that.

If not... well, I don't know what to tell you for how many loops to use it for... maybe use it for the same number of loops as 2.5 gets?

I would also be game for testing out V1. If Ben can link it, I would happily keep a journal for it with some of my experiences on it.

[Steven]

Shannon,

"I'd like to cause it to trigger them not just sexually, but in all the ways that person needs to respond by initiating and having sex with the user. I think this is a big issue right now - it's lopsided. Too much sexual and not enough of whatever else is needed and desired."

I think this is right on.

It seems that even if she feels disinhibited, and turned on, etc. there needed to be something else. I thought of it as comfort or safety or "appropriateness" but I couldn't quite articulate it.

Perhaps if the aura could guide the receivers' and the user's unconscious to do what is needed to create the conditions to achieve the goals of the program. I'm sure you can word it better, and I'm guessing it would have to be dynamic to the person, situation, etc.

[OberynMartell]

If I could test v1 again I would gladly do that. That was the version where I really felt like a chick magnet, girls were really showing interest, staring blatantly, trying to rip my shirt off. However I also remember sweating like a pig feeling hot all the time. I'm not saying it was better than v2.5, don't get me wrong. But I haven't felt the attention from girls like on v1.

[hunk]

Number 3, for those of us who purchased DMSI can we request one of the older versions talking specifically about V1)?

I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.

Yay! That's great news. I've been using v2.4 and v2.5 and would love to be able to try v1. From what I've read here, it was probably the most successful version as far as achieving the program goals is concerned - with side effects, of course.

@Ben: Would you please do the honours when you get a chance? Thank you.

[chaosvrgn]

Just found my old AOSI journal. Looks like the protocol was two loops run back to back. Thinking about loading her up. My kiddo will be with her mom this weekend and I'm looking to get the old chocolateydiggitydoo wet.

[Shannon]

I'd like feedback on how V1 compares to V2.4/2.5.

Ben, please link V1 as an add on to the downloads for V2.5, so that people can download either or both if they like.

[JackOfHearts]

Don't tell me twice , V1 for tonight. Let's see how powerful it is.

[chaosvrgn]

Just loaded it up. Running my two loops, then heading to boxing. After that, I'll cruise around the grocery store for a bit. If I recall, last time I went to Wal-Mart on v1, I had these women follow me around like puppies.

[JackOfHearts]

Here is what you said Shannon on the loop on V1:

Shannon Wrote:
Try 4 first. Spend some time at that level. Let's see if that makes a difference. So far the pattern from the models seems to be showing a progression of 1-2-4-8 hours of exposure being significant.

(06-15-2016 01:31 AM)Shannon Wrote:
According to the models in a conglomerate view, the results seem to decrease more than anything else doing more than 8 loops per day. And it is loops, not hours, since each run through is 75 minutes.

[chaosvrgn]

@Alpha360:

Good catch. Just dawned on me, I was only running 2 loops because I was running it with AM6. That means I'll be able up the loops now.

[hunk]

I'd like feedback on how V1 compares to V2.4/2.5.

Ben, please link V1 as an add on to the downloads for V2.5, so that people can download either or both if they like.

Hi Shannon,

Since we're requesting Ben to make the old version of dmsi available, do you think it'll be possible to have/buy the single stage version of BASE please? (the one which was made available for a limited time)

I have purchased BASE v2.1 (5G), but would like to run the single stager after DMSI.

I believe some other forum members had requested for single stager BASE to be made available again here (during last couple of weeks):
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-p...#pid138425

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-p...#pid138480

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-p...#pid138651