Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

But what I was saying isn't about doubting subs or having a perfect childhood, it was about not knowing how far the "as above, so below" claims can be taken. To this day I still have some things that happen even though my beliefs contradict them.

All I'm saying is, if it were as simple as you put it, that would NOT be the case.

Focusing on the limitations creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of.. well, self-limiting. I have an idea of how far it could go theoretically, but it's one of those things where you focus on where you're currently at and how to break past that level.

You won't know how far you can go until you get there, and trying to figure it at your current level of understanding will harm you in the long run. To get to where I want to be in life, I had to teach myself to enjoy the journey rather than focus on the end game. That way, instead of thinking, "what can I get from this," I now focus on what I have.

And the abundance keeps flowing because internally, I feel I'm at a higher state that hasn't quite manifested on the physical realm yet. But, because I KNOW it's coming, it'll come. Which is interesting because I never thought like this before AM6 -- which I'm thinking is the result of the slipstream technology?

As for your claims of contradicting beliefs, I think you're still confused about the difference between subconscious beliefs and conscious thought.

It would be a combination of slipstream and thrown anchor. I call the technique where I have you project part of your awareness into the ideal future where you have already accomplished the goal, the "thrown anchor technique" because it's like throwing an anchor to where you want to go, and then pulling yourself there.

Sarge, you're limiting yourself by thinking in absolutes. If X then Y doesn't apply the way you want to think it does in this case. It works because there are shades of gray and complexities beyond hat you're allowing yourself to see or accept. And whether or not you want to see or accept it, it does work, and those of us who can and will open our eyes and minds to it, experience it, and use and benefit from it every day.

So from that, we can logically deduce that all of us who use it are delusional, or you are at some level afraid of accepting the idea that maybe this is the truth for some reason.

You seem to be strongly self sabotaging in a lot of ways. This, I think, is one of them. But hey, I don't think we will ever see eye to eye, so enjoy what you have and chive on.

[Life]

But what I was saying isn't about doubting subs or having a perfect childhood, it was about not knowing how far the "as above, so below" claims can be taken. To this day I still have some things that happen even though my beliefs contradict them.

All I'm saying is, if it were as simple as you put it, that would NOT be the case.

Focusing on the limitations creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of.. well, self-limiting. I have an idea of how far it could go theoretically, but it's one of those things where you focus on where you're currently at and how to break past that level.

You won't know how far you can go until you get there, and trying to figure it at your current level of understanding will harm you in the long run. To get to where I want to be in life, I had to teach myself to enjoy the journey rather than focus on the end game. That way, instead of thinking, "what can I get from this," I now focus on what I have.

And the abundance keeps flowing because internally, I feel I'm at a higher state that hasn't quite manifested on the physical realm yet. But, because I KNOW it's coming, it'll come. Which is interesting because I never thought like this before AM6 -- which I'm thinking is the result of the slipstream technology?

As for your claims of contradicting beliefs, I think you're still confused about the difference between subconscious beliefs and conscious thought.

It would be a combination of slipstream and thrown anchor. I call the technique where I have you project part of your awareness into the ideal future where you have already accomplished the goal, the "thrown anchor technique" because it's like throwing an anchor to where you want to go, and then pulling yourself there.

Shannon hey , i've notice through my journey that sensation of feelings a lot. I would say on a regular basis almost all the time. It's definitely part of the growth but I was wondering if there are other techniques u incorporate that we can have knowledge on? I want to know if over the years I listen to a program again will this be more powerful such as multiple runs of a six stage set or is it always based on present factors in the mind. If you could provide an answer that would be great

[wolverine_i_am]

Hey Shannon, I need some advice which sub order will attract sexual partners quicker.

I'm currently doing AM6. Deciding whether to use MYPSL or SM3 first. I've been doing cold approaching for a year now. I've had dozens of dates, couple of make outs, but still yet to pull the trigger to go sexual. Regardless of the future results, I'll still be using both subs - it's just the matter of which I'm gonna use first.

From what I know, MYPSL is more manifestation-orientated, that it doesn't really help advance your skillset, and just does a good job at attracting whatever girl is perfect for you at the given point in time. Whereas SM3 is more focused on approaching and seducing girls, and then in the latter stages turning the tables, having the girls approach us - but it doesn't necessarily guarantee a sexual lover by the end of it. Am I right regarding the comparison of the two?

I'm thinking since I still lack sexual experience, if I use MYPSL first, I can get more experience in that department handled asap. It should guarantee more confidence and I'll be able to have a more successful run with SM3 afterwards.

It's not cause I'm impatient. More like I wanna be efficient and get over this hurdle the sooner the better.

Later on, after 2-3 runs of SM3, I am definitely interested in using other MYP subs (the active manifestors sound promising).

If anybody else has any advice or input to add, please feel free to. Thanks.

First, neither one guarantees a success. That always depends on factors outside my control.

I advise you to use SM3 after AM6 to get the best outcome.

Thanks Shannon. Yeah after thinking about it, it makes sense to use SM3, cause it'll further my development.

[Vincent_Vega]

So FLAC will only be included in the newly built ones, right?

[Shannon]

But what I was saying isn't about doubting subs or having a perfect childhood, it was about not knowing how far the "as above, so below" claims can be taken. To this day I still have some things that happen even though my beliefs contradict them.

All I'm saying is, if it were as simple as you put it, that would NOT be the case.

Focusing on the limitations creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of.. well, self-limiting. I have an idea of how far it could go theoretically, but it's one of those things where you focus on where you're currently at and how to break past that level.

You won't know how far you can go until you get there, and trying to figure it at your current level of understanding will harm you in the long run. To get to where I want to be in life, I had to teach myself to enjoy the journey rather than focus on the end game. That way, instead of thinking, "what can I get from this," I now focus on what I have.

And the abundance keeps flowing because internally, I feel I'm at a higher state that hasn't quite manifested on the physical realm yet. But, because I KNOW it's coming, it'll come. Which is interesting because I never thought like this before AM6 -- which I'm thinking is the result of the slipstream technology?

As for your claims of contradicting beliefs, I think you're still confused about the difference between subconscious beliefs and conscious thought.

It would be a combination of slipstream and thrown anchor. I call the technique where I have you project part of your awareness into the ideal future where you have already accomplished the goal, the "thrown anchor technique" because it's like throwing an anchor to where you want to go, and then pulling yourself there.

Shannon hey , i've notice through my journey that sensation of feelings a lot. I would say on a regular basis almost all the time. It's definitely part of the growth but I was wondering if there are other techniques u incorporate that we can have knowledge on? I want to know if over the years I listen to a program again will this be more powerful such as multiple runs of a six stage set or is it always based on present factors in the mind. If you could provide an answer that would be great

Not sure I understand your question. But those factors I can share I do.

[Shannon]

So FLAC will only be included in the newly built ones, right?

The FLACs are derived directly from the WAV audio stream I create. That means they're pristine. But each one of these single stage builts takes about 20-25 gigabytes of space on my disk. Even with a 512 GB hard disk, it has to be cleared away. So I keep the FLAC and MP3 and erase the build files and WAVs. That means that to create the FLACs for anything previous, I have to rebuild it, which I cannot afford the time to do for such a small improvement.

Going forward, there will be FLACs.

[lokko]

So FLAC will only be included in the newly built ones, right?

The FLACs are derived directly from the WAV audio stream I create. That means they're pristine. But each one of these single stage builts takes about 20-25 gigabytes of space on my disk. Even with a 512 GB hard disk, it has to be cleared away. So I keep the FLAC and MP3 and erase the build files and WAVs. That means that to create the FLACs for anything previous, I have to rebuild it, which I cannot afford the time to do for such a small improvement.

Going forward, there will be FLACs.

Well if you're going to start using flac, samsung just created the biggest ssd drive to date. I'd recommend an ssd drive over hard drive the speed of file transfers are so fast.

http://www.engadget.com/2016/03/03/samsu...-shipping/

[Shannon]

So FLAC will only be included in the newly built ones, right?

The FLACs are derived directly from the WAV audio stream I create. That means they're pristine. But each one of these single stage builts takes about 20-25 gigabytes of space on my disk. Even with a 512 GB hard disk, it has to be cleared away. So I keep the FLAC and MP3 and erase the build files and WAVs. That means that to create the FLACs for anything previous, I have to rebuild it, which I cannot afford the time to do for such a small improvement.

Going forward, there will be FLACs.

Well if you're going to start using flac, samsung just created the biggest ssd drive to date. I'd recommend an ssd drive over hard drive the speed of file transfers are so fast.

http://www.engadget.com/2016/03/03/samsu...-shipping/

My computer currently runs on an SSD, 512 GB. It's about 7x faster than the fastest spinning drive I had before it, which is to say it is no longer painful to wait for read/write operations on the large amounts of data I work with. But I certainly would not mind having that beast. 15.35 TB of course would necessitate a considerable expenditure for the drive, and then I would have the joy of creating a RAID array for it's backup. I suspect the cost of all this is not currently feasible.

[Life]

Will my second run of all six stages of SM be stronger because I've run it once before. Does it just build off my current progress?

[Spiritman]

Will my second run of all six stages of SM be stronger because I've run it once before. Does it just build off my current progress?

Basically, yes it will. It is like running AM 3-4 times in a row. The more you run it, the more that program can sink into your mind to become automatic.

[Life]

I mean that's what I assumed and I will be re running these programs for years to come but I would like a bit more detail. Just, would the program come across as stronger or pronounced? can we expect new results or effects from stages as our minds have accepted the programming once already.

I guess I can wait and see but getting more insight would be helpful

[chaosvrgn]

I mean that's what I assumed and I will be re running these programs for years to come but I would like a bit more detail. Just, would the program come across as stronger or pronounced? can we expect new results or effects from stages as our minds have accepted the programming once already.

I guess I can wait and see but getting more insight would be helpful

My second run of AM6 thus far has been both stronger and more pronounced. Optimus Engine is kicking in with a vengeance. I've never had so much motivation to go to the gym / do martial arts in my entire life. Sometimes, working out, making money and educating myself is all I can think about. This didn't happen in the first run. First run was six months of curling up in a ball and hating my life, hahaha.

Weird thing was, I felt masochistic -- it hurt, but it... hurt really good? My guess is that the first run brought me out of the depths of omegahood. Second run is actually doing what the sub intended, considering how low I was in the beginning. After this, it's EPHRA 2.0 for three months and then a third run... unless Ultimate Writer is available.

[Shannon]

You don't clear a lot for building in one pass. First you knock down the trees, then you clear out the brush, then you rip out the roots. Likewise, you can only make so much progress in one pass with growth. But for those who are willing to stick to it and cooperate, the results are there. The programs are designed to build on themselves from one pass to another yes.

[Life]

Ok thank you. And I'll be here to update on the contrast