Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[freerad98]

@Shannon

Could you explain more about "luck" if it doesn't reveal any trade secrets?
TIA

[Shannon]

@Shannon

Could you explain more about "luck" if it doesn't reveal any trade secrets?
TIA

Here is what I can tell you.

1. After all the research and experimentation I have done, I no longer believe in "luck" as it is defined by the majority of people. I believe that everything happens for a reason, and it only appears to be luck because we cannot see all of what caused it.
2. Humans have the natural ability to generate what looks like "luck", good or bad.
3. The Luck Magnifier is not using manifestation to create what looks like luck. It is simply making use of the natural ability you have, which was previously not being used or directed.

[THolt]

@Shannon

Could you explain more about "luck" if it doesn't reveal any trade secrets?
TIA

Here is what I can tell you.

1. After all the research and experimentation I have done, I no longer believe in "luck" as it is defined by the majority of people. I believe that everything happens for a reason, and it only appears to be luck because we cannot see all of what caused it.
2. Humans have the natural ability to generate what looks like "luck", good or bad.
3. The Luck Magnifier is not using manifestation to create what looks like luck. It is simply making use of the natural ability you have, which was previously not being used or directed.

@Shannon

When 6G comes out, will you create a line of manifestation subs that focus on a wide range of topics like friendship, success, etc?
How far will you be able to push manifestation at that point?

[myth]

1. After all the research and experimentation I have done, I no longer believe in "luck" as it is defined by the majority of people. I believe that everything happens for a reason, and it only appears to be luck because we cannot see all of what caused it.

This actually reminds me a lot of how I see hope: As the inarticulate feeling that, because we don't see/know all of our present and future choices/options (we're not omniscient or omnivalent), we can't know that something is hopeless. I see hope as understanding that the lack of visible options is not the same as lack of options, as visibility can come with time/effort and with intermediate choices, actions, and events.

It's also why I take strong issue with the Doyle/Sherlock quote "when you've eliminated the impossible..." as it disregards the inability of the detective to know all of what's possible. This is actually known as a Holmesian fallacy: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Holmesian_fallacy

[Havana]

@Shannon If DMSI A's H&C modules target around 85% of what E2 targets (by your estimation), does that mean the Fear Removal modules will also target around 85% of the totality of our fears?

[Chris P. Bacon]

Shannon

Is there a possibility that you will be adding some kind of energy flooding to LTU 5.5? If LTU motivates us to get our life in order, maximize our time and succeed in life we will actually need more energy because highly productive people manage their energy and motivation which manages their time.

All 5.5G subs, including E2, use energy flooding in some form or other, depending on which aspects of the energy flooding module set are compatible with the goals of the program.

Energy flooding is not the same as energy sourcing. Energy flooding is aimed at flooding you with energies that help achieve the goals in certain ways. Energy used to power the program is partially aspected by energy sourcing, and partially by several other modules that are not energy flooding.

Oh I guess I didn't understand that there was such a difference, thanks for clarifying.

I mean energy sourcing then. To bring about the best version of our life will take a considerably large amount of energy and I guess I'm more curious as to your intent for LTU 5.5 on the energetic side of the sub and how it could look compared to other 5.5 subs.

[Shannon]

@Shannon

Could you explain more about "luck" if it doesn't reveal any trade secrets?
TIA

Here is what I can tell you.

1. After all the research and experimentation I have done, I no longer believe in "luck" as it is defined by the majority of people. I believe that everything happens for a reason, and it only appears to be luck because we cannot see all of what caused it.
2. Humans have the natural ability to generate what looks like "luck", good or bad.
3. The Luck Magnifier is not using manifestation to create what looks like luck. It is simply making use of the natural ability you have, which was previously not being used or directed.

@Shannon

When 6G comes out, will you create a line of manifestation subs that focus on a wide range of topics like friendship, success, etc?

Yes, that is the plan.

How far will you be able to push manifestation at that point?

I cannot answer that yet, as I don't have enough data yet.

[DarkTempatation]

Hi @Shannon hope you are good! I just wanted to ask if you can consider adding 'stop swearing' into the new LTU as LTU is about improving one's life. Thanks ?

[SargeMaximus]

Hi @Shannon hope you are good! I just wanted to ask if you can consider adding 'stop swearing' into the new LTU as LTU is about improving one's life. Thanks ?

Is it that hard to not swear?

[Shannon]

@Shannon If DMSI A's H&C modules target around 85% of what E2 targets (by your estimation), does that mean the Fear Removal modules will also target around 85% of the totality of our fears?

First, understand that I am making an estimate of the difference between what E2 targets and what DMSI targets. I reserve the right to be wrong.

Second, understand that DMSI-A targets only what stands in the way of your achievement of DMSI's goals. This means the difference can and almost certainly will vary from person to person.

Third, the fear removal modules will only target those fears that prevent you from executing DMSI. It does not necessarily logically follow that the percentage of what is targeted by DMSI vs what E2 would target equals the percentage of fears targeted by the fear removal modules, because a single fear can generate multiple "child issues".

[Shannon]

Shannon

Is there a possibility that you will be adding some kind of energy flooding to LTU 5.5? If LTU motivates us to get our life in order, maximize our time and succeed in life we will actually need more energy because highly productive people manage their energy and motivation which manages their time.

All 5.5G subs, including E2, use energy flooding in some form or other, depending on which aspects of the energy flooding module set are compatible with the goals of the program.

Energy flooding is not the same as energy sourcing. Energy flooding is aimed at flooding you with energies that help achieve the goals in certain ways. Energy used to power the program is partially aspected by energy sourcing, and partially by several other modules that are not energy flooding.

Oh I guess I didn't understand that there was such a difference, thanks for clarifying.

I mean energy sourcing then. To bring about the best version of our life will take a considerably large amount of energy and I guess I'm more curious as to your intent for LTU 5.5 on the energetic side of the sub and how it could look compared to other 5.5 subs.

Why do you make this assumption? How do you know that it is not true that to bring about the best version of your life, all you need to do is stop fighting it and step across from one probability line to another? Perhaps it takes virtually no energy at all.

Energy sourcing is not going to be a big issue for LTU.

[Fluffy]

@Shannon

Wil you be using DMSI 3.3?

[rayrocanaldo]

Hi @Shannon hope you are good! I just wanted to ask if you can consider adding 'stop swearing' into the new LTU as LTU is about improving one's life. Thanks ?

Is it that hard to not swear?

Ikr

[Steve_]

Testing a bug with the mention system. Ignore this.
@RTBoss