Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9

[Shannon]

No break is stated because none is required, and it is not useful.  It is in fact counter effective to take a break between the run-throughs.

Thank you.  I know you've also been warning about the risks of subconscious boredom, and taking a break after 4 months of programs like AAMTS stage 0.  I'll run PRA v2c for 4 months and see how I feel.

Allow me to be specific, and prevent potential misunderstandings.

PTSD Recovery Aid does a very good job dealing with certain very challenging factors, including fear. Our testing has revealed that if you come to the end of a run-through and you are getting good results and making progress, that taking a break between run-throughs is likely to result in backsliding and problems.

The instructions for Non-complex PTSD are for 2 months at a time, and Complex requires 3 months at a time.  If you run it for 3+ months and it stops working (because of subconscious boredom), THEN you will need to do something else.  But unless that happens, you're going to be good for at least 2 back to back run-throughs.  Subconscious boredom is not guaranteed to happen.

[Darwin]

Hi Shannon, 

I subscribed to the new MLS. This is for a young person who has a learning difficulty. I paid better attention to the warning after i subscribed and didn't use it for them in the end (at all). 

Hopefully this request doesn't sit too far down the set of priorities, but given the restrictions around the current MLS could you produce an MLS, or a sub to support younger people. This might be the current MLS without without without the brain optimiser, or something gentler which supports primarily with confidence and curiosity. I think the hard part of a learning challenge, is less the slowness of learning itself, but the effect that slower learning/different learning styles can have on confidence when comparing with peers. My concern is about the long term development challenge that comparison, and a sense of 'being behind' can pose. I think of these challenges can be overcome with persistence, goal setting and a love for learning and experiment with learning/development which is what I'd most like to support them with.

Something I've been reading is 'the yes brain child', which is around nurturing a child's resilience, curiosity + helping them develop the skill of positively engaging and enjoying a challenge. Mostly this is done through deep listening to a child, it seems to work quite well in supporting that self confidence to express themselves, but it's hard for me to have the presence of mind to support with this approach all the time. If helpful, I'd be happy to send you a brief.

Interested to hear from other folks who have responsibilities with younger humans and their development about whether you'd like to see something like this.

Thanks, 

Darwin

[Lionstrength]

Thank you Shannon now with me being risen by a single mother (broken hope) would I be able to Run AAM Stage 0 a few times? (My ultimate goal is to move out and stay independent within 1 year) so the vision I have is MLS to upskill for finance/business (and other interest of course) then UMSv3 to build strong savings and multiple income streams (close) and have the confidence to be free of financial anxiety and then I plan to do AAM full stage and do alot of deep work during that time. I'm just trying to figure best path and wanted to ask I know PRAv1 is in Stage  0 will it ever be updated to PRAv2?

 
You cannot run Stage 0 more than 4 months at a time.  You are unlikely to continue getting benefits after 4 months because your subconscious will probably become bored of listening to the same script for too long.

Stage 0 uses the same Key Script as PRA v2c.  There's no upgrade necessary.

There is a trap here that I'm going to point out and guide you around.  You can be helped by MLS and UMS but they will not solve your problems yet because you don't have the foundation necessary.  If you have traumas regarding learning, schooling or finances, they are likely to trigger a massive amount of resistance from your subconscious, and you'll probably spend a lot of time getting very little result unless you overcome the traumas that cause the resistance first.  That may change when I rebuild them in 6.5G, but for the time being, this is important to be aware of.  

So before you try to run either of them, sit down and ask yourself some serious questions.  Answer honestly.  For MLS: Do I have traumatic experiences in my past that I associate with school and learning?  Do I deep down believe that learning is somehow dangerous, or going to lead to something dangerous for me?  Do I have fear of expressing my full intelligence?  Do I have fear of achieving my full accomplishment potential when it comes to learning?  Do I pretend to be less intelligent or knowledgeable to "fit in"?  Any of these might trigger the resistance I am talking about.

For UMS, the questions are similar.  Do I hold core beliefs that contradict being financially wealthy?  Do I hold core beliefs that make being wealthy somehow a bad thing?  Would I rather go along with and be accepted by the anti-wealth herd than be wealthy? Do I fear being treated differently by my family and friends and strangers if I become wealthy?  Do I fear losing family and friends because of having money?  Do I believe that being wealthy will somehow get me punished?  Do I believe that somehow, poverty is a virtue?  Do I somehow associate wealth with disconnection from my primary internal locus of security?

Especially regarding UMS, there are a LOT of possible faulty beliefs that can hold you down and stand in the way of becoming wealthy to whatever degree you would become wealthy if you fully executed.  There have been a LOT of teachings over the years that have been aimed at preventing people from achieving their full financial potential, and some of them have become twisted, misunderstood and warped into even more damaging versions of themselves.  

For example, the belief that being wealthy is somehow going to make you a bad person.  Wealth doesn't make you a bad person; it just takes the mask off and allows you to more freely act on what you were all along.  If you were a selfish, arrogant prick the whole time, then you'll just show the world that you were that all along.  But if you're a kind, caring person, who wants to make the world a better place, then there's a good chance that you'll be empowered to do that more.  The more wealthy you have the more influence you have on the world around you.  

Wealth itself is just a tool, like a hammer.  You can use a hammer to build a home, or crush someone's skull and kill them.  The hammer isn't evil because of the latter, or good because of the former; it is just a tool.  Just as wealth is just a tool, to be used and deployed in the manner of the person who owns it.

Recently there's been a lot of brainwashing going on in the directions of "we should hate billionaires because all billionaires are bad".  The very same people who are asking you to believe that are the very same people who were saying the exact same thing about millionaires.... until the moment they themselves because millionaires.  (While doing jobs that could never account for them becoming millionaires... hmmm.)

Being a billionaire is no different than being a millionaire is no different than being broke as a joke when it comes to what and who you are.  You are only being uncovered and unleashed by the power to do more as you please that it gives you.  The money is not good or bad.  It simply is.  What it's current owner chooses to do with it, that's what matters.  Who and what you are is who and what you will be if you have more money... just with more potential to influence the world if and how you see fit.  

So money itself isn't a problem.  More money is more potential to do good in the world, as much as it is more  potential to do bad.  And having money doesn't mean you have to tell anyone at all that you have it... or do anything at all with it.  I have met self made millionaires who dressed in raggedy old overalls and beat up shoes and ate plain oatmeal every morning and cheap Salisbury steaks and mashed potatoes every evening because they didn't want to spend their money.  You can do whatever you want with your money.  

And that is why you have so many factions trying to manipulate your beliefs regarding money.  In some ways, money = freedom, and freedom means one less person that can be controlled.  Some people, ad groups, thrive on controlling other people to gain their power.  By convincing you that having money you will become the target of someone else, they make you avoid money out of fear.  By convincing you that having money makes you somehow inherently "bad", they do the same thing.  And again, the same thing by convincing you that having money means you'll lose out on something after you die, and again by making you misunderstand that saying, "The love of money is the root of all evil." Most people know it as "Money is the root of all evil."  But regardless of which of those you have heard and internalized... is it even true?

This is a long winded way of saying that money, wealth, has around it a LOT of tangled and false and faulty beliefs in most people, which end up being the result of someone or something else trying to manipulate them into being and staying below their financial potential in order to gain control and power over you.  Because let's face it, if you're sitting pretty, you don't need someone else's "help", through which they can then extract favors and control.  The vast majority of people who struggle financially do so because someone taught them to hold false, faulty beliefs that result in them being less than they have the potential to be financially.  That may have been simply being exposed to someone else who sincerely held these false or faulty beliefs, or being exposed to someone or some group who intentionally teaches or spreads such beliefs in order to gain or maintain control.

A lot of people think that "the wealthy don't want us to be wealthy too". but that is not the case.  The wealthy I have met either don't care if you are wealthy, or want those who have less wealth to improve their class along with their wealth: to wit, I have no problem with my neighbors from Guatemala and Mexico and Haiti becoming wealthy.  I do have a problem with them becoming wealthy and still acting like they're living in the ghetto, because people from the ghetto don't usually behave with consideration for those around them.  I don't want to listen to their music in my house all night from 1 or 2 blocks away. 

Anyway, enough soap boxing.  The point is, if you hold beliefs that strongly disagree with you becoming wealthy and your subconscious concludes that having that wealth will put you in someone's crosshairs, or that you will be punished, or it will get you killed or worse, then that part of you is going to work hard - very hard - to derail your efforts in order to "keep you safe".  And in that case, you're better served with using PRA v2c and waiting until I manage to get the 6.5G version of UMS out.

Now as for Stage 0, I suggest you run it for a month and see what happens, and then decide what to do from there.  If you don't like what it's doing, go to PRA v2c instead.  If you do like what it's doing, then continue your run for a total of 4 months and assess from there.

Thank you shannon I will start Stage 0. How long should I wait to start i just finished cyle 4 on days lastnight (it was exactly 1 month of MLS)

[Shannon]

 
You cannot run Stage 0 more than 4 months at a time.  You are unlikely to continue getting benefits after 4 months because your subconscious will probably become bored of listening to the same script for too long.

Stage 0 uses the same Key Script as PRA v2c.  There's no upgrade necessary.

There is a trap here that I'm going to point out and guide you around.  You can be helped by MLS and UMS but they will not solve your problems yet because you don't have the foundation necessary.  If you have traumas regarding learning, schooling or finances, they are likely to trigger a massive amount of resistance from your subconscious, and you'll probably spend a lot of time getting very little result unless you overcome the traumas that cause the resistance first.  That may change when I rebuild them in 6.5G, but for the time being, this is important to be aware of.  

So before you try to run either of them, sit down and ask yourself some serious questions.  Answer honestly.  For MLS: Do I have traumatic experiences in my past that I associate with school and learning?  Do I deep down believe that learning is somehow dangerous, or going to lead to something dangerous for me?  Do I have fear of expressing my full intelligence?  Do I have fear of achieving my full accomplishment potential when it comes to learning?  Do I pretend to be less intelligent or knowledgeable to "fit in"?  Any of these might trigger the resistance I am talking about.

For UMS, the questions are similar.  Do I hold core beliefs that contradict being financially wealthy?  Do I hold core beliefs that make being wealthy somehow a bad thing?  Would I rather go along with and be accepted by the anti-wealth herd than be wealthy? Do I fear being treated differently by my family and friends and strangers if I become wealthy?  Do I fear losing family and friends because of having money?  Do I believe that being wealthy will somehow get me punished?  Do I believe that somehow, poverty is a virtue?  Do I somehow associate wealth with disconnection from my primary internal locus of security?

Especially regarding UMS, there are a LOT of possible faulty beliefs that can hold you down and stand in the way of becoming wealthy to whatever degree you would become wealthy if you fully executed.  There have been a LOT of teachings over the years that have been aimed at preventing people from achieving their full financial potential, and some of them have become twisted, misunderstood and warped into even more damaging versions of themselves.  

For example, the belief that being wealthy is somehow going to make you a bad person.  Wealth doesn't make you a bad person; it just takes the mask off and allows you to more freely act on what you were all along.  If you were a selfish, arrogant prick the whole time, then you'll just show the world that you were that all along.  But if you're a kind, caring person, who wants to make the world a better place, then there's a good chance that you'll be empowered to do that more.  The more wealthy you have the more influence you have on the world around you.  

Wealth itself is just a tool, like a hammer.  You can use a hammer to build a home, or crush someone's skull and kill them.  The hammer isn't evil because of the latter, or good because of the former; it is just a tool.  Just as wealth is just a tool, to be used and deployed in the manner of the person who owns it.

Recently there's been a lot of brainwashing going on in the directions of "we should hate billionaires because all billionaires are bad".  The very same people who are asking you to believe that are the very same people who were saying the exact same thing about millionaires.... until the moment they themselves because millionaires.  (While doing jobs that could never account for them becoming millionaires... hmmm.)

Being a billionaire is no different than being a millionaire is no different than being broke as a joke when it comes to what and who you are.  You are only being uncovered and unleashed by the power to do more as you please that it gives you.  The money is not good or bad.  It simply is.  What it's current owner chooses to do with it, that's what matters.  Who and what you are is who and what you will be if you have more money... just with more potential to influence the world if and how you see fit.  

So money itself isn't a problem.  More money is more potential to do good in the world, as much as it is more  potential to do bad.  And having money doesn't mean you have to tell anyone at all that you have it... or do anything at all with it.  I have met self made millionaires who dressed in raggedy old overalls and beat up shoes and ate plain oatmeal every morning and cheap Salisbury steaks and mashed potatoes every evening because they didn't want to spend their money.  You can do whatever you want with your money.  

And that is why you have so many factions trying to manipulate your beliefs regarding money.  In some ways, money = freedom, and freedom means one less person that can be controlled.  Some people, ad groups, thrive on controlling other people to gain their power.  By convincing you that having money you will become the target of someone else, they make you avoid money out of fear.  By convincing you that having money makes you somehow inherently "bad", they do the same thing.  And again, the same thing by convincing you that having money means you'll lose out on something after you die, and again by making you misunderstand that saying, "The love of money is the root of all evil." Most people know it as "Money is the root of all evil."  But regardless of which of those you have heard and internalized... is it even true?

This is a long winded way of saying that money, wealth, has around it a LOT of tangled and false and faulty beliefs in most people, which end up being the result of someone or something else trying to manipulate them into being and staying below their financial potential in order to gain control and power over you.  Because let's face it, if you're sitting pretty, you don't need someone else's "help", through which they can then extract favors and control.  The vast majority of people who struggle financially do so because someone taught them to hold false, faulty beliefs that result in them being less than they have the potential to be financially.  That may have been simply being exposed to someone else who sincerely held these false or faulty beliefs, or being exposed to someone or some group who intentionally teaches or spreads such beliefs in order to gain or maintain control.

A lot of people think that "the wealthy don't want us to be wealthy too". but that is not the case.  The wealthy I have met either don't care if you are wealthy, or want those who have less wealth to improve their class along with their wealth: to wit, I have no problem with my neighbors from Guatemala and Mexico and Haiti becoming wealthy.  I do have a problem with them becoming wealthy and still acting like they're living in the ghetto, because people from the ghetto don't usually behave with consideration for those around them.  I don't want to listen to their music in my house all night from 1 or 2 blocks away. 

Anyway, enough soap boxing.  The point is, if you hold beliefs that strongly disagree with you becoming wealthy and your subconscious concludes that having that wealth will put you in someone's crosshairs, or that you will be punished, or it will get you killed or worse, then that part of you is going to work hard - very hard - to derail your efforts in order to "keep you safe".  And in that case, you're better served with using PRA v2c and waiting until I manage to get the 6.5G version of UMS out.

Now as for Stage 0, I suggest you run it for a month and see what happens, and then decide what to do from there.  If you don't like what it's doing, go to PRA v2c instead.  If you do like what it's doing, then continue your run for a total of 4 months and assess from there.

Thank you shannon I will start Stage 0. How long should I wait to start i just finished cyle 4 on days lastnight (it was exactly 1 month of MLS)

3 days should be fine.

[Lionstrength]

Thank you shannon I will start Stage 0. How long should I wait to start i just finished cyle 4 on days lastnight (it was exactly 1 month of MLS)

3 days should be fine.

Thank You Shannon I will be starting Stage 0 while using the instructors for the 4 month run to expirement to see how it goes for 1 month and if can handle it will complete full run (if not move to PRAv2). To confirm 1 loop 1 day 3 days off at 9 clicks for my iPhone. Looking forward to see what progress I can make!

[Shannon]

3 days should be fine.

Thank You Shannon I will be starting Stage 0 while using the instructors for the 4 month run to expirement to see how it goes for 1 month and if can handle it will complete full run (if not move to PRAv2). To confirm 1 loop 1 day 3 days off at 9 clicks for my iPhone. Looking forward to see what progress I can make!

Correct.

[Darwin]

Bumping this in case not seen, Shannon. 

Meanwhile i have another question. Partly inspired by your post on asking onself questions to uncover why a person may resist.

I haven't looked at this forum in a long time and picked up just a handful of journals to see how people are progressing. A small sample, so the trend may be wrong - but i notice a lot of referring to the effects of subliminals from the passive standpoint. The sort of statements I see are around -  'I have felt inexplicably tired', 'something must be working because yesterday i was really anxious'. I often see allusions to a sensation of 'something must be happening, or is being worked on'. 

I wonder if part of the problem of execution is a passive linguistic frame. When running subliminals, I have previously posted or spoken with the belief that subliminals do something mysterious to you, and something mysterious resists - with me not playing any role. In reality, the subliminals are a collection of statements mixed with whatever other sub-audible things you do to those statements. It is me who is listening, it is my beliefs which the statements may contradict, and It is I who is saying no, even if I'm not yet clear on why I don't want to achieve the goals. 

So my job if I want to 'execute', is to uncover why I don't want to achieve the objectives being stated by the audiotrack and then decide truly and self-convincingly, that I want the objectives. Otherwise I've always striuggled with the paradox of not executing, when i have no conscious control of execution.

Is that accurate? and if so - what in your opinion is the best approach to consciously unweaving these beliefs?

Hi Shannon, 

I subscribed to the new MLS. This is for a young person who has a learning difficulty. I paid better attention to the warning after i subscribed and didn't use it for them in the end (at all). 

Hopefully this request doesn't sit too far down the set of priorities, but given the restrictions around the current MLS could you produce an MLS, or a sub to support younger people. This might be the current MLS without without without the brain optimiser, or something gentler which supports primarily with confidence and curiosity. I think the hard part of a learning challenge, is less the slowness of learning itself, but the effect that slower learning/different learning styles can have on confidence when comparing with peers. My concern is about the long term development challenge that comparison, and a sense of 'being behind' can pose.  I think of these challenges can be overcome with persistence, goal setting and a love for learning and experiment with learning/development which is what I'd most like to support them with.

Something I've been reading is 'the yes brain child', which is around nurturing a child's resilience, curiosity + helping them develop the skill of positively engaging and enjoying a challenge. Mostly this is done through deep listening to a child, it seems to work quite well in supporting that self confidence to express themselves, but it's hard for me to have the presence of mind to support with this approach all the time. If helpful, I'd be happy to send you a brief.

Interested to hear from other folks who have responsibilities with younger humans and their development about whether you'd like to see something like this.

Thanks, 

Darwin

[Rois83]

Hi Shannon,

I have a friend who is a professional poker player.

I was thinking if Ultra Success Luck Magnifier will help him? Can this affect karma?

When he plays online he is fine because he plays lots of tournamnets so he can easily materialize his ROI because his variance is lower. But when he plays in person, variance increases and drawdowns get longer.

He doesn't need luck, he will be happy if the results match his statistics. So if he has a hand that wins 60% of the time, to actually win that amount of times.

Thank you!!

[Frosted]

Hi Shannon,

I have a friend who is a professional poker player.

I was thinking if Ultra Success Luck Magnifier will help him? Can this affect karma?

When he plays online he is fine because he plays lots of tournamnets so he can easily materialize his ROI because his variance is lower. But when he plays in person, variance increases and drawdowns get longer.

He doesn't need luck, he will be happy if the results match his statistics. So if he has a hand that wins 60% of the time, to actually win that amount of times.

Thank you!!

I imagine Shannon will mention that his programs are designed to not affect gambling to avoid encouraging people to make poor financial decisions.

[Lionstrength]

Thank You Shannon I will be starting Stage 0 while using the instructors for the 4 month run to expirement to see how it goes for 1 month and if can handle it will complete full run (if not move to PRAv2). To confirm 1 loop 1 day 3 days off at 9 clicks for my iPhone. Looking forward to see what progress I can make!

Correct.

Thank You 2 questions

1) Just had an oconologist app will probably be doing 9 weeks of chemo will stage 0 interfer with chemo or vice versea?
2) Would be able to be credited a month for Stage 0 my MLS was charged as we were discussing since I stopped and havent used since new charge do to too much resistance?


Looking forward to seeing what I can accomphlish with Stage 0

[Shannon]

Bumping this in case not seen, Shannon. 

Meanwhile i have another question. Partly inspired by your post on asking onself questions to uncover why a person may resist.

I haven't looked at this forum in a long time and picked up just a handful of journals to see how people are progressing. A small sample, so the trend may be wrong - but i notice a lot of referring to the effects of subliminals from the passive standpoint. The sort of statements I see are around -  'I have felt inexplicably tired', 'something must be working because yesterday i was really anxious'. I often see allusions to a sensation of 'something must be happening, or is being worked on'. 

I wonder if part of the problem of execution is a passive linguistic frame. When running subliminals, I have previously posted or spoken with the belief that subliminals do something mysterious to you, and something mysterious resists - with me not playing any role. In reality, the subliminals are a collection of statements mixed with whatever other sub-audible things you do to those statements. It is me who is listening, it is my beliefs which the statements may contradict, and It is I who is saying no, even if I'm not yet clear on why I don't want to achieve the goals. 

So my job if I want to 'execute', is to uncover why I don't want to achieve the objectives being stated by the audiotrack and then decide truly and self-convincingly, that I want the objectives. Otherwise I've always striuggled with the paradox of not executing, when i have no conscious control of execution.

Is that accurate? and if so - what in your opinion is the best approach to consciously unweaving these beliefs?

First, recognize that our forum is almost dead.  Less than 1/10th of 1% of our customers post here, and usually the ones who do are the ones having trouble or needing help.  So what you see on the forum is not reliably representative of the larger population at this time.  We have noted that most people do not post if they are happy with the results.

To answer your question, you must first understand that "me" typically means "the part of me that wakes up every morning, and falls asleep every night, which my conscious awareness can see".  That is sonly one layer and part of "you".  You also have various layers and parts within layers which are not visible to the conscious, which we call "subconscious" or perhaps "superconscious" in some cases. These layers and parts also have an awareness of self in most cases.  

So "you" listen to the subliminal, but somewhere between around five and tens or more layers and parts within those layers may all be interacting with the script and reacting in response.  Some parts of your subconscious will accept the instructions and begin trying to execute them.  In the case of significant resistance, some part or parts of you at the subconscious mental level or the purely instinctual level may come to the conclusion, for whatever reason, that executing the instructions given ultimately results in some sort of threat to you and your safety, or in some cases, your (or it's) very existence.  Sometimes this will be because of a contradictory belief that - if you executed and the goal was achieved would prove that that belief was faulty, and force you to re-build your entire world view.  Sometimes it's because a part of your subconscious concludes that either executing the instructions or achieving the end goal is a threat to your safety or life.

Your job at a conscious level is to use the subliminal correctly, and if it does not work, either find a usage pattern that does work (by consulting me about it) or, if there are no other options, trying to understand the resistance and what is going on, so you cana potentially make some sort of change from the conscious level to aid the results.

However...

This does not take into account that fact that different generations of subliminal technology have different levels of success in dealing with resistance.  The later generations - 5.11G, 6.0G and especially 6.5G, are light years past previous generations for dealing with resistance.  5.11G is acctually so far behind 6.5G that it really doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence, but it still falls within the "light years past everything else" category.

So your first goal in overcoming resistance, is to take advantage of my work towards overcoming resistance, by using the newest technology you can get your hands on for what you're trying to accomplish.  6.5G is advanced enough that so far I have noted that the best my own subconscious can do to resist is one of the following thngs:

1. For a few days during Stage 1 of AAMTS v7, some part of me which had a SERIOUS resistance to executing, progressively expressed more and more pain (emotional pain) in response to executing.  It was attempting to get conscious me to stop so it did not have to face it's fears.  This process culminated with quasi-conscious communications from it in utter desperation and panic, begging conscious me to stop.  Since I know what's in the script, and I know there's nothing in the script that could be harmful or cause me problems, I knew that it was a crystallization of an inner child who held one or more beliefs that would erase it as a crystallization, which is why it was expressing so much pain and desperation - literally it was begging for it's existence.  But it's existence was based on a false, faulty belief that was holding all the rest of the parts of "me" back, and I wasn't using AM7 so I could be held back by faulty beliefs.  So I kept going, and by Day 5 of using Stage 1, that part of me had been overridden completely.  No holding me back.  That part of me had been able to hide from and resist through every other generation of tech I have used.  Not 6.5G.  And it only took 5 days to identify and overwhelm it with what the program was trying to do.  Since then, no such experiences.  That is mind blowing on both how fast it was found, and how fast it was dealt with.

2. Since then, I have noted that my resistant subconscious will attempt to cause me to forget to run the program.

3. I also notice that it attempts to use distraction to help with #2.

Previously, it would simply stonewall if there was enough resistance; I have a VERY strong will.  There were a wide variety of other ways it attenoted to resist.  Now... the only ways left are those three.  And #1 is dealt with quickly if you just keep going.  #2 and #3 are dealt with by being mindful, and keeping a calendar marked up and prominently displayed.  I'll be working on eliminating even these three soon.

Hi Shannon, 

I subscribed to the new MLS. This is for a young person who has a learning difficulty. I paid better attention to the warning after i subscribed and didn't use it for them in the end (at all). 

Hopefully this request doesn't sit too far down the set of priorities, but given the restrictions around the current MLS could you produce an MLS, or a sub to support younger people. This might be the current MLS without without without the brain optimiser, or something gentler which supports primarily with confidence and curiosity. I think the hard part of a learning challenge, is less the slowness of learning itself, but the effect that slower learning/different learning styles can have on confidence when comparing with peers. My concern is about the long term development challenge that comparison, and a sense of 'being behind' can pose.  I think of these challenges can be overcome with persistence, goal setting and a love for learning and experiment with learning/development which is what I'd most like to support them with.

Something I've been reading is 'the yes brain child', which is around nurturing a child's resilience, curiosity + helping them develop the skill of positively engaging and enjoying a challenge. Mostly this is done through deep listening to a child, it seems to work quite well in supporting that self confidence to express themselves, but it's hard for me to have the presence of mind to support with this approach all the time. If helpful, I'd be happy to send you a brief.

Interested to hear from other folks who have responsibilities with younger humans and their development about whether you'd like to see something like this.

Thanks, 

Darwin

MLS is a much more challenging subliminal than I had originally imagined to make work for everyone, because a subset of people have very negative and sometimes even traumatic experiences based on their experience of learning and "schooling".  I have yet to be able to make it work for that subset of people.

Making one for children would be multiple orders of magnitude more difficult, because children - 0 to 17 years old - go through at least 5 separate phases of development that I have identified, and the rules for engagement are different for each one.  Furthermore, the brain is still developing, and using a subliminal influences that.

I make subliminals for adults because in almost all cases, there would be an enormous amount of R&D that would be necessary to make subliminals that are Safe, Effective and Useful for children given these factors, and it would require an enormous investment in educating myself regarding child psychology, development and neurology that I simply do not have the time for right now.  The last time I made a lime of subliminals that specifically included children was in 4th Gen tech for these reasons.  I can make such subliminals again, but without having that education, I don't feel comfortable making subliminals for children.  And getting that education would effectively shut down all other operations for between 4 and 8 years.

Only rarely will I release a subliminal that is approved for children under 18 for that reason.  Very few meet the right criteria.

[Shannon]

Hi Shannon,

I have a friend who is a professional poker player.

I was thinking if Ultra Success Luck Magnifier will help him? Can this affect karma?

When he plays online he is fine because he plays lots of tournamnets so he can easily materialize his ROI because his variance is lower. But when he plays in person, variance increases and drawdowns get longer.

He doesn't need luck, he will be happy if the results match his statistics. So if he has a hand that wins 60% of the time, to actually win that amount of times.

Thank you!!

As has been mentioned, I do not wish to make programs that encourage gambling or gambling addiction to form or be enabled.  Anything in it with luck magnifier is therefore specifically designed not to be helpful when gambling.  And yes, it could affect his karma and mine if I had the program so enabled, which is part of why I do not.  Ultra Success would potentially be helpful for maximizing his success in that direction, howeveer.

[Shannon]

Correct.

Thank You 2 questions

1) Just had an oconologist app will probably be doing 9 weeks of chemo will stage 0 interfer with chemo or vice versea?
2) Would be able to be credited a month for Stage 0 my MLS was charged as we were discussing since I stopped and havent used since new charge do to too much resistance?


Looking forward to seeing what I can accomphlish with Stage 0

1. Stage 0 has Brain Optimizer in it.  Brain Optimizer is, among other things, seeking to optimize your brain chemistry and the balance of neurochemicals.  This may be distrupted by chemotherapy.

2. No, that falls outside our refund policies.

[Frosted]

@Shannon

Do you have any recommendations for achieving greatness besides using AM7? I’m kinda soul searching on what I want to pursue and I don’t just want to rely on your Subliminals I want to consciously cultivate myself as well.

I think more than anything I’ve found that I want to be a living masterpiece. A work of art for its own sake. A monument to what is possible and the greatness of Life.

The thing that most comes to mind is meditation. I’m also working on business and social skills as well in the real world. Are there any “secrets” or wisdom you recommend to those of us using AM7 that want a bit of extra credit? I haven’t found anything as potent as your Subliminals yet. The only thing that comes close, to my knowledge, is meditation.