I AM Wealth - UMS Journal

[AlphaRomeo]

Cycle 4, day 6 off.

One thing that I have noticed even more strongly in the current cycle with UMS than earlier is that I seem to fluctuate between "old me" and this "new me" that UMS is gently but firmly pushing me towards, even tho this "new me" feels much more natural and something that I have "always been", if that makes sense. Similar thing has happened with other subs as well, but with UMS its more pronounced. When Im being this "new me" it feels familiar, and the "old me" feels strange even tho I have spend being "old me" most of my life. Maybe its the E3 in UMS that is restoring things to "natural order", or combination of several modules. Whatever it is, that is the best way I can describe it. Probably not terribly valuable data/information and more like "duh", but strong enough effect for me to report about it.

[AlphaRomeo]

Cycle 5, day 3 on.

So I took 7 days off to "reset my mind". Now after 3 days on, cycle 5, I still have not been as productive as I was in the beginning of UMS (TID and first cycle). Too much exposure, too little exposure, who knows...havent been able to find my sweet spot yet or Im fighting the program still. However, the EM3 module keeps doing its job so maybe it takes all the energy and focus, and puts everything else "on hold".

Thats all for today folks. Stay tuned, Ed.

[AlphaRomeo]

Cycle 6, day 4 off.

Not too much to report regarding external results, just wanted to put this out there in order to keep track on cycles.

Huge internal shift regarding to wealth tho, but its not had lead to external action, yet. Probably the workings of EM3 in UMS. I feel like Im standing in some kind of threshold, or doorway/"gate" (maybe same/similar to what Shannon talked about some time ago). Also, even tho in order to get external results requires external actions, at least to some extend, I feel like this is more of a matter of ALLOWING effortless action to take place and allowing things to happen, instead of "forcing" things to happen. Thats the best way I can describe what is happening.

[Omni3]

Yes, in my intention setting I use the phrase "...easily and effortlessly comes to me..."

[AlphaRomeo]

Coolio.

[AlphaRomeo]

Cycle 8, day 2 on.

I just commented on Shannons Journal something like "UMS is slow to take off despite the initial excitement"
I think I should reconsider that statement because a lot of groundwork has been done where UMS did the heavy lifting. It very well may be that the program itself is not "slow to take off", but that I have had so much hiccups and unhealthy beliefs and attitudes about wealth that it takes some time to clean them all out even if UMS is working fully. Some of what has been cleaned I am conscious about but there might be something also still going on that I am not conscious of. A lot of limiting stuff is dissolving, thats for sure. At the same time, I think UMS is working on from so many angles that sometimes its difficult to spot what is exactly going on, and it may give illusion that there is less going on that what is actually the case.

[AlphaRomeo]

Cycle 8, day 2 off.

Not much to report, except the unexpected celebrity aura side effect seems to get stronger day by day, OR that is TID from DMSI which I probably will run in the near future, or combination of those two. The baseline interest from ladies has increased ever since I started UMS and seems to gain momentum, which again might be UMSs doings OR (the momentum gaining part) TID from DMSI, or combination of both. Lol. *Spins the roulette wheel*, last bets please.

[AlphaRomeo]

So last sunday, when it should have been my 1st day of Cycle 9, I f-ed up and self sabotaged, not royally but significantly enough to cause regret and considerable turbulence and annoyance. So I listened 4 loops of DMSI, thinking switching to it, BAD IDEA! Just when I started to feel really good about UMS again and JUST ABOUT TO TAKE ACTION I gave up to temptation. Self sabotage at its finest! Subconscious mind must have been realising that I was just about to mean business and it must have mustered all the force it has to have me press that play button...only on the wrong file! It was weird, I was like half conscious, realising that bad idea...yet I hit that f...ing button. Yes, my own responsibility, and I come back to that in a bit.

And as I was listening I felt that amazing, focused, moola-energy kinda draining from me, dissolving into nothingness...and being replaced by this restless yet lazy, and non focused energy that felt much "lower" (best I can describe) compared to the first one. It was strange. It felt similar to when you have build up a lot of sexual energy and if you then ejaculate you lose that energy. But I felt this not only in body but I literally felt the energy fields around me changing in the matter of minutes or faster. I am very in tune with energies, and dont remember this strong of training/switching happened before, with subs or otherwise. Now Im left with this anxious energy that takes me nowhere fast. I guess it would build into something nice in time if I kept using DMSI, but I dont want to have it right now as the goal of UMS is much more important (now that Im back in my senses, lost my marbles on sunday, but only temporarily) than that of DMSI, which leads me back to taking responsibility...

Lesson learned, self forgiveness given, UMS it is! So since I am already experiencing turbulence, I reckon it would be good idea to get back to it reasonably fast (instead of normal waiting period) as UMS should be still dominant sub in the background of my mind as at this point I have I listened it already almost 3 months vs. one day of DMSI. When I wake up it will 3.th day after the bad move, and I figured I will wait yet that day and then on 4.ht go back to UMS.

@Shannon , whats your advice, how long should I wait? My guts tells me to go back to UMS on 4th day, if not sooner. Also, you may find this bit of data useful: Something similar has happened few times before. Not switching back and forth, but switching to different sub all together just week or two before 3 months of usage. With MHS I took break instead of switching at least one time after 2 and half month period. This was due doctors order after doing more damage to my ears.With OP/UM I switched to US/LM due its release schedule. From US/LM do DMSI. (It was either OP/UM or US/LM where it was 2 and half months, with other bit less.) And finally, with at least two earlier versions of DMSI (around v3.0), 2 and half months! These are instances I remember. Always week or two or so before 3 months block. For variation of surface reasons; ear damage, something with my other aspect of health, release schedule, whatever it is. My subconscious has always found either reason, or creating/manifesting a reason, to do so almost like a clock work. As I have become aware of this pattern I have more power to avoid it. I was aware of it at some point earlier, but yet somehow managed to talk my self out of that awareness even then. And now this day of DMSI in the middle of UMS run (which got released, you guessed it, week or so before 3month usage)...f*** it! Aint gonna happen now...back to UMS!

Does all the subs after certain tech/gen have the module of preventing switch, um...prematurely, or just some? I think MLS had it (that which I did not switch, but took break from before resuming), DMSI I guess...how about UMS? If not, UMS2 should definitely have it in my opinion. Anyway, I hope my mentioned pattern is useful data. Not only for regarding to possible prevent switching , but also regarding to timing of it etc. I call for something like "Use 3+ Months Without Switching Or Your Head Will F***NG Explode!" - module. lol.

EDIT: Actually, now that I remember, with MLS there was short MIS break, then back to MLS , and total exposure of 8 AND HALF WEEKS , two weeks shy of 9 months (3 months blockages), and with BASE I had pause due doctors order. Nevertheless, pattern is there!

[Shannon]

@Shannon , whats your advice, how long should I wait?

Don't wait. DMSI is more powerful than UMS. You're going to want to start back on UMS ASAP if you want it to dominate DMSI. There will be some turbulence, but that's what you get when you mix superpowerful subs that have conflicting goals.

Does all the subs after certain tech/gen have the module of preventing switch, um...prematurely, or just some?

All of them, with a few exceptions. You don't need that in things like Awakener, for example.

[AlphaRomeo]

Thank you Shannon. Alright, back on UMS (Cycle 9, day 1)

@Shannon , you may find this interesting:
In about 10 minutes now...the initial restlessness that the day of DMSI mistake caused is easing already, and I am getting more focused state of mind which is nice. It feels like I have started to kind of "suck back in" from the "universe" the energy that I lost/was drained off with DMSI. Almost exactly, if not exactly, like the reversal off what I described earlier, but with slower speed. Very, very interesting! I will let the UMS do whatever it is doing and just relax and enjoy the ride for this loop and report back later. Some serious stuff, this voodoo that you are working on is!!!

[AlphaRomeo]

40 min in...damn this baby feels good! Why, oh why, did I ever cheat with DMSI this amazing beauty for such a short passing moment of temptation that wasnt even satisfying!?

What sort of Voodoo is this?

[AlphaRomeo]

Cycle 9, day 3 on, (So the first day on was technically early wednesday, but I consider it as tuesday since it was before I actually went to sleep. Wednesday late night was day two and so now, thursday is day three.)

Trying to overcome/overwrite the turbulence (due one day of DMSI mistake). On day one listened 2 loops instead of one since I felt I needed more of it on order to overpower DMSI. On day 2 listened only 1 loop, but during the day the DMSI kinda took over in various of times. Today, on thursday, listened one loop in the day time, but despite the initial UMS focus, DMSI keeps taking over or at least causing turbulence. So now, its 10pm and Im about to hit another/second loop of UMS for day 3. I initially used only 1 loop /day, and have been on 3days on 7days off regime, to which I will return once I am able to stabilize this weird pendulum mood, which feels almost like having "pendulum pesonality", swinging back and forth between UMS goals and being focused, and DMSI restlessness and whatever else DMSI is doing.

@Shannon , should I continue using UMS past the day 3 to get it dominant, or take a break after the last loop of today as in 3days on/7days off regime? Increasing loops/day temporarily? Trying to find the fastest way to get back to track.

[Shannon]

Stop fiddling around with one or two loops at a time then. I'm relatively certain that the reason the models indicated 1 loop and then 7 days off was because the step up was so big and people would need to get used to it, and because we would need to see how long bloom should last.

If you want to overpower DMSI, you're going to have to get serious. Even then it's going to take a while.

Try 6-8 loops for 1-3 days on and then 5 days off.

[AlphaRomeo]

Stop fiddling around with one or two loops at a time then.  I'm relatively certain that the reason the models indicated 1 loop and then 7 days off was because the step up was so big and people would need to get used to it, and because we would need to see how long bloom should last.

If you want to overpower DMSI, you're going to have to get serious.  Even then it's going to take a while.

Try 6-8 loops for 1-3 days on and then 5 days off.

This is the first time I remember when your comment does not make sense, or if it does I have to be mind reader to more or less extend. Maybe its language barrier for me that slightly confuses the message.

If UMS is so powerful, how come DOUBLING the number of loops is considered "fiddling". I had no way of knowing, which is why I asked you. I also had no way of knowing exactly how much more powerful DMSI is.  How is model indication of UMS relative to my question? Before my mistake, 7 days off worked better than less days off (not 5, or 4), for me. Also, 1 loop per day has been working fine as my post about how I felt just before the mistake indicates, I never needed feel for 6-8 loops as others have been doing, which is why I didnt do it in these past three days either but instead doubled the loops.

Asking you for advice is not serious?

Yes, I made a mistake, and no, Im not gonna dwell on it. Instead, the best course of action is to take best course of action, which is why I asked your advice. In this case, "Try 6-8 loops for 1-3 days on and then 5 days off", would have been enough, instead of comments about fiddling and accusing me of not being serious.

Thank you for the advice tho.