(02-29-2020, 11:55 AM)rono Wrote: Thanks for the response, Shannon.
She is nowhere near obese, but once was about 35lbs overweight. She just never was able to stay at her ideal weight. I'll outline her 'issues' to see if they line up with what you're planning for the newer version of WL:
1) She tends to munch-- not as much out of hunger but because she's in the kitchen a lot and there are so many things there that appeal to her. Will power wears down and she grabs a handful of nuts, for example. Also, along those lines, she was not taught to not eat while cooking, or rather perhaps eating while cooking was modeled for her. In my case, at home I was taught to not sample the goods while cooking (unless tasting for spice balance) and in professional kitchens it was forbidden. If she could have the latter habits instilled rather than the former, that would be huge for her.
2) She may eat slightly more than she needs at meals, just to not throw something away that she likes. e.g. I may not eat all of my portion of the nice fresh fruit salad because she happened to make a little too much and I know my limits and just naturally stop. She adds a few unnecessary calories this way, too. The fruit salad example applies to other portions that are served.
3) Due to our schedule, she will sometimes feel like she needs to 'stock up' because the next time we eat may be a long time from now. This is much less prevalent than it used to be.
This information comes from both my observations of her and her 'confessions' to me when she just wants some 'help'. Obviously, it's not in a husband's best interest to get too involved, but she is interested in what your sub might do.
I read some of the logs on the weight loss sub, but these were unsatisfying and it makes sense that the subs were only 50% - 85% effective long term based on what I read.
When do you think you'll have the new WL sub ready? I'm already thinking of putting her on it while I stay on DMSI 3.3.2. But would certainly want to do it sometime during the next month, but that's not firm, it's just what we had discussed. I think I want to do one more cycle of DMSI 3.3.2 with her, so that gives me a couple more weeks before I'd need to make a decision.
I have to clarify some things.
First, not saying or implying that she's obese. Just providing all the data. It was designed to work for everyone, and some obese people have personalities and reasons for being overweight that resist the methods used in WL6. Roughly 50% of obese people who have reported from using it seem to resist. By contrast, I would estimate that at least 85% of people who are not obese get very good results from WL6, and see a significant weight loss.
Second, that doesn't make it 50-85% effective long term. The 50% is roughly how effective it is at overcoming the resistance (subconscious fears) of obese people who use it. The 85% figure is an approximate minimum for how effective it is at overcoming the resistance (subconscious fears) of people who use it who are not obese. It affects 100% of users, but it does not overcome resistance as well as it needs to, which is what I have been focused on developing ever since; thus, FRM.
As to which would be better for your wife in the circumstances you give, the program I am about to release is Appetite Suppressant 5.75G. AS works by adjusting the appetite to remove the eating that you do above what you need to do to be at your ideal weight. It is entirely possible that she eats in those circumstances out of subconscious anxiety or fear that she doesn't consciously know she is experiencing. If her eating is based on hunger, this will work. If it is simply pure habit, it may or may not. It is too soon for me to know the answer to that scenario yet.
If it does affect her, it will work with more certainty than WL6 because it uses a much more advanced and powerful skeleton script. However, WL6 has a much broader target, and as long as she doesn't resist it, it will definitely work. Based on your past results with her, we know she responds to subliminals, and we know she isn't obese, so I would conclude that either one should work.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!