Shannon's Journal Discussion

[XyzN]

The sniper effect is based on the concept of focusing on specific attributes that you find attractive, and according to how attractive you find them. So when you come across a woman who has a stunning body, that's what will be the basis for the auric sniping. If she's plain, but has what you consider a sexy brain, then her brain will be the basis for the auric sniping.

Makes sense for me since I have a few girls I'm interested in at work. I reflect and look back on how I treat each of them so differently, but so well. I've gotten all their attention, if a little bit.

I'm like an actor almost it feels like, a masterfully suave one at that! Who can adapt to any girl he admires.

[Benjamin]

What are the physical applications of this, I wonder... (D type?)

As for DMSI the physical application is obviously giving her the D!

[Raz]

From reading the DMSI journals, especially chaosvrgn, I begin to suspect that Shannon added Ultra Success to the script of 2.4 as the surprise.

Am I right?

[ffaux]

I think the surprise is aura of a celebrity.

[lokko]

I remember in the past Shannon mentioned to have subs at very low volume. Now I'm seeing users doing loud ultrasonic and so on. I will be attempting trickling stream again. Should it be moderately loud? I snore fairly loud according to people, I wonder if low volume is not for me since that reason.

[eternity]

We will get there if it is within my power. Sometimes I get discouraged, but there's always the next day when I realize that regardless of my discouragement or whatever else, the job must get done and I am not aware of everything. If I have been set on this path, there must be a good reason. So I soldier on.

Well you shattered the ceilings of what was considered humanly possible, and continue to do so all the time. You're surely more than halfway "there" when it comes to dmsi.

And perhaps you'll uncover something as you finish GPR / MHS / MIR that will be useful for dmsi / 6g. Perhaps journals from the physical healing subs will provide you with crucial data you didn't know you needed. Just thinking out loud here...

Either way, have you ever gotten females to test any of the newer versions? If the sub works for them, you can safely say that you achieved the goal, but there's a missing element the gents are having trouble with, and the ladies' success will indicate something. So more versatile testing might also be useful there.

I have had very limited opportunity to have female testers for DMSI. Only my girlfriend and one other. The other tested a couple times back in 2.1/2.2 only. GF consistently reports that DMSI is a very effective aphrodisiac whenever I expose her, but I am more than a little reluctant to expose her because of what it's designed to do. She definitely becomes more sexually aroused, interested, aggressive and initiates more after exposure, which is interesting given how highly sexual and initiatory she is to begin with. But, I don't want to give the advice to use DMSI as an aphrodisiac yet because I am not done determining what the safety effects are. Have to go slowly and carefully with that.

So would you say the demand for such a sub by women is minimal? Therefore making it more suitable, specifically, for men looking to attract women? Or maybe keep it generalized in " attracting members of the gender I am attracted to" but limiting it's usability by men?

I wonder if that would allow you to use script for goals that are specifically oriented for males, which would make the end product more effective. Considering the huge divide between male and female interest in the program (I don't think any women have expressed interest) it may be best to make it male specific.

[Shannon]

From reading the DMSI journals, especially chaosvrgn, I begin to suspect that Shannon added Ultra Success to the script of 2.4 as the surprise.

Am I right?

Nope.

[Shannon]

I think the surprise is aura of a celebrity.

Nope.

[Shannon]

I remember in the past Shannon mentioned to have subs at very low volume. Now I'm seeing users doing loud ultrasonic and so on. I will be attempting trickling stream again. Should it be moderately loud? I snore fairly loud according to people, I wonder if low volume is not for me since that reason.

You should calibrate volume as specified in the instructions.

[Shannon]

We will get there if it is within my power. Sometimes I get discouraged, but there's always the next day when I realize that regardless of my discouragement or whatever else, the job must get done and I am not aware of everything. If I have been set on this path, there must be a good reason. So I soldier on.

Well you shattered the ceilings of what was considered humanly possible, and continue to do so all the time. You're surely more than halfway "there" when it comes to dmsi.

And perhaps you'll uncover something as you finish GPR / MHS / MIR that will be useful for dmsi / 6g. Perhaps journals from the physical healing subs will provide you with crucial data you didn't know you needed. Just thinking out loud here...

Either way, have you ever gotten females to test any of the newer versions? If the sub works for them, you can safely say that you achieved the goal, but there's a missing element the gents are having trouble with, and the ladies' success will indicate something. So more versatile testing might also be useful there.

I have had very limited opportunity to have female testers for DMSI. Only my girlfriend and one other. The other tested a couple times back in 2.1/2.2 only. GF consistently reports that DMSI is a very effective aphrodisiac whenever I expose her, but I am more than a little reluctant to expose her because of what it's designed to do. She definitely becomes more sexually aroused, interested, aggressive and initiates more after exposure, which is interesting given how highly sexual and initiatory she is to begin with. But, I don't want to give the advice to use DMSI as an aphrodisiac yet because I am not done determining what the safety effects are. Have to go slowly and carefully with that.

So would you say the demand for such a sub by women is minimal? Therefore making it more suitable, specifically, for men looking to attract women? Or maybe keep it generalized in " attracting members of the gender I am attracted to" but limiting it's usability by men?

I wonder if that would allow you to use script for goals that are specifically oriented for males, which would make the end product more effective. Considering the huge divide between male and female interest in the program (I don't think any women have expressed interest) it may be best to make it male specific.

So far, demand for this sub by women would seem to be limited, at best. This seems to be because they don't need it. In fact all but one have expressed a complete lack of interest or even fear of it (the ones who feared it were afraid of rape). After all, the offer of sex from a woman is usually enough to get her sex.

But you guys keep making the mistake of thinking that by cutting out women, I could somehow make it "more suitable, specifically, for men looking to attract women". It would not. I can work in gender-unspecified ways without reducing the power and effectiveness, with the exception being references to specific sex organs, which is unnecessary in this case.

You also are forgetting that this program is designed for six different markets at once. (gay, straight, bi) x (male, female). Doing it any other way would have me building more than one version, which I am not willing to do. This thing is insane enough to work with already.

But also, you don't realize what you would be giving up by making it even just male specific. There are potential alternate uses which I am exploring, based on that universality.

Don't worry. I know what I'm doing. We just have a very tall mountain here to conquer.

[THolt]

"Beast 8 has a Minimum Time Of Singular Expression (MTOSE) of fully 20 minutes. That means that, to express the whole script at least once, it requires 20 minutes of exposure. Definitely time to re-compress. I like to keep the MTOSE down to a maximum of 5-10 minutes if possible."

Shannon,
Will this result in lower listening times for 6G programs if everything goes right?

[Shannon]

"Beast 8 has a Minimum Time Of Singular Expression (MTOSE) of fully 20 minutes. That means that, to express the whole script at least once, it requires 20 minutes of exposure. Definitely time to re-compress. I like to keep the MTOSE down to a maximum of 5-10 minutes if possible."

Shannon,
Will this result in lower listening times for 6G programs if everything goes right?

I think I forgot to put this into perspective.

If it were not compressed to the degree that it is, that 20 minutes would be 16 hours plus of audio. It would take more than 16 hours of listening to hear the entire script just once. That's how beastly long the damned thing is.

So the fact that it's 20 minutes long and still comprehensible is amazing, but for my purposes, 20 minutes is the outer limits. I have to achieve the goals of the 6G prototype within 20 minutes, or the test fails.

So to answer your question, yes. Higher compression means faster input means lower listening times. Although that by itself is not the reason why it would require lower listening times; there are two other things along with compression that I use that, taken as a whole, result in these very low listening time requirements.

[robstar]

Shannon, a few months ago, I had a girl I was seeing and starting to fall for bail on me out of the blue.. I thought I was beginning to get over it to a reasonable level, until I started to run dsmi 2.4.. Now it feels like I'm experiencing the break up over and over again, all I can think about is how badly I want her back, the intensity is almost unbearable. Is this the healing modules of dsmi expressing themselves? Will this pass? I'm getting attention from girls, I even had a girl give me her number while I was busking the other day, but I don't care because all I can think about is her.

[Shannon]

Shannon, a few months ago, I had a girl I was seeing and starting to fall for bail on me out of the blue.. I thought I was beginning to get over it to a reasonable level, until I started to run dsmi 2.4.. Now it feels like I'm experiencing the break up over and over again, all I can think about is how badly I want her back, the intensity is almost unbearable. Is this the healing modules of dsmi expressing themselves? Will this pass? I'm getting attention from girls, I even had a girl give me her number while I was busking the other day, but I don't care because all I can think about is her.

Yes, this is one of the effects of the healing modules. Yes, it will pass. The goal of the healing modules is to identify, seek out and neutralize anything and everything within you that represents an emotional issue that might prevent you from achieving success with the program. So you are just healing a case of one-itis you didn't know you had. This too shall pass.