05-18-2021, 01:00 PM
(05-18-2021, 12:39 PM)CatMan Wrote:(05-18-2021, 12:31 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-18-2021, 12:27 PM)CatMan Wrote:(05-18-2021, 12:15 PM)Shannon Wrote: This is fucking ridiculous.
Basically.
Look, how about we just skip the extra work for you, and added delay for us, and release it now with said instructions. Gets it over with.
We both know there will always be a portion of people who won't do the recommended loops anyway. So let's just get this out there and go with it with the instructions.
I couldn't do that even if I wanted to. Ben hasn't linked it up yet because I wasn't finished. I'll have him link it regardless, but it's going to take some time either way. In the mean time, I'll keep trying, but at this point I suspect something or someone is trying to prevent me from releasing this, and I'm sick of the crap.
These things happen. I believe it's a good thing, here's why...
I think I know what's wrong:
Since it's such a new program, such new technology, so far beyond AOL's level, the models can't even fully quantify what they're dealing with. Like asking a fish to compare a tricycle to a Ducati. So getting a reliable number isn't feasible. That's my view. I've had similar issues in business at times. Sounds like your models need to be built out a bit more to reflect the new potency. This is a very good sign of progress I believe. I bet that's the problem, Shannon. Try to relax, it's more indication of a large step forward here!
I actually think the problem is slightly different. I think it boils down to the following things:
1. Based on the models giving me answers that don't qualify as "unstable", but also don't qualify as "stable" - which I have never seen before in the 15+ years I have been using them - I suspect there is some sort of interference from my subconscious or someone or something else attempting to inject "noise" into and interrupt the answers to this sequence of questioning to delay or prevent the release.
2. This generation of tech is so far from what we had before that I have no idea what parameters are reasonable to even use to run through the models to find the best usage patterns. I've had to do my best to make educated guesses on that. I'm sure if the answers I got were wrong, we will figure it out through adjusting as necessary.
I'm just really tired of and frustrated with a lot of things right now that are slowing me down, holding me back, delaying progress, killing success, etc. and which are either out of my hands or happening for stupid reasons.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!