Hello, chaosvrgn 
If you ran AM6 just once, depending on your results you may want to consider another run-through. If I'm not mistaken, Shannon suggests that people need up to 3 runs to get long-term or permanent results in most cases.
Yeah, it could definitely be wisdom, lol.
I used the word "baffled" before, but now I'm thinking it's not the most appropriate for the case. It's not that I *can't* read women per se, it's more that I used to get bored/resistant after doing it for a while - not a very useful personality trait for a long-term relationship. There's a huge improvement in that area in the last year, but I still have my bad days sometimes. These instances are definitely getting rarer as time goes on. To a large extent I can attribute this to going for higher quality women.
I'm fine with faking it, as long as it eventually transitions to a natural, deeply conscious behavior (although at this point - skill-set or even "value system" would seem like a more appropriate term.)
I'm more interested in using the MBTI framework to go out of my personality type and master the others, rather than learning to function within one particular type. Seems to me that the latter approach would defeat the purpose of intimacy. (and personal growth in general)
(12-06-2015, 09:53 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: I'm debating between BASE or Sex Magnet (for the intimacy issues) after I finish AM6.
If you ran AM6 just once, depending on your results you may want to consider another run-through. If I'm not mistaken, Shannon suggests that people need up to 3 runs to get long-term or permanent results in most cases.
(12-06-2015, 09:53 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: That being said, in stage 4 of AM6, I began to consciously focus my intuition on reading people's energy and emotional states and combining my perceptions with what I know about that person's type. For example, being an NT, I have a tendency to approach every problem with methodical, hyper-logical precision. SF types, though, aren't looking for that. Especially SF women. Generally, they just want a hug and reassurance that everything's gonna be okay. It's been working out extremely well. I'm thinking the wisdom enhancement in AM6 has something to do with it.
Yeah, it could definitely be wisdom, lol.
I used the word "baffled" before, but now I'm thinking it's not the most appropriate for the case. It's not that I *can't* read women per se, it's more that I used to get bored/resistant after doing it for a while - not a very useful personality trait for a long-term relationship. There's a huge improvement in that area in the last year, but I still have my bad days sometimes. These instances are definitely getting rarer as time goes on. To a large extent I can attribute this to going for higher quality women.
(12-06-2015, 09:53 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: I'd say to just keep at it. If you're an NT or ST (intimacy doesn't come easy to these types), practice makes perfect. You can learn to "fake it" enough to get results.
I'm fine with faking it, as long as it eventually transitions to a natural, deeply conscious behavior
(although at this point - skill-set or even "value system" would seem like a more appropriate term.)I'm more interested in using the MBTI framework to go out of my personality type and master the others, rather than learning to function within one particular type. Seems to me that the latter approach would defeat the purpose of intimacy. (and personal growth in general)
