6 hours ago
(6 hours ago)Shannon Wrote:(8 hours ago)ichigo Wrote: Hey Shannon,
For X4A-1600, I assume the listening instructions were based on the optimal amount of exposure for the user to get to sex?
#1 Just out of interest, did you ever model the optimal amount of exposure time to get the strongest aura / most polarising results without pushing into overexposure so the subconscious is overloaded?
For me that was 8 loops of X4A-1500, gave me the most "blatant" and "fun" results. I'm aware it might not be the best to lead to actual sex but what if you're just after the most blatant responses i.e. strongest arousal in the quickest time possible?
Why would you be running a $650 subliminal aphrodisiac just to get blatant responses that don't lead to sex? Do you realize how ridiculous that is?
I don't calculate the usage patterns to make people go flying past sex into making women respond obviously enough to entertain men, while failing to get to sex in the process. The goal of an aphrodisiac is sex, and the instructions are designed to get you as close to sex as possible.
As to overloading the subconscious, are you experiencing any level of exhaustion from 45 minutes per day on? I'm going to presume not. You know why that is? It's because we don't want you to experience exhaustion. That is part of why I calculate the sweet spot for where people will be happiest with the program's results. Much more than 45 minutes a day and you'll be in exhausted/overload territory, unless you're some sort of really bizarre outlier.
Quote:#2 If you're using the line of sight to arouse via video call or staring at a photograph, would the person be able to tell you were the source of their arousal, or they would just get aroused but not know what caused it?
Appreciate your responses, thank you
They will become aroused and be noticing you at the same time. It's human nature to notice conditions around oneself in order to try to understand "why" something happened. So it would be natural for them to suspect, and later conclude, that they are becoming aroused in response to you.
If you're inexperienced with women, and especially if you're a virgin, and this is true when you're in your mid twenties or later, then there are going to be things subconsciously for you to deal with and work through to get to sex with women. X4A-1600 can work you through those over time, but it will take time. You may not be seeing the results you want until that process has sufficiently taken place. By the sounds of it, though, you actually don't want sex, you want to see women react with sexual arousal. If that's the case and you simultaneously don't want actual sex, then you're likely using this program for what amount to narcissistic reasons, which is definitely not how it was designed or intended to be used.
Hi Shannon,
Apologies, I don't think I worded my question very well. I meant that previously, using higher loops of X4A would make my aura stronger and cause polarisation, which meant generally if a woman was responding she was more likely to be up for sex quickly than if they would be repelled by it. Kind of like wearing a high dose of androstenone with pheromones, helps to weed out those who are up for quick sex versus those who aren't. This did make it less likely to respond in sex with some women, but at least there was a blatant reaction so you knew they weren't interested.
Your responses make sense though, thank you for them.
