Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8

[Shannon]

Also excited for X4A

(Also - what does X4a actually stand for?? I still dont know till this day.... Sex 4 All?)



Curious though on the test studies of X4A-2000 being a flop.

Based on the stories - alot of women did engage with interest...

Multiple women per tester, with one exception, did engage with interest over the course of 3 months of testing.  However, it wasn't as if this happened every day or every time we went out, although one pof the testers had two women responding every time he saw them.

Just that the male test subjects were morally in-allowed to progress it further..
So ... it was a flop in terms of - until it fully landed in sex - that the test cant be concluded as successful?
Seemed like it was working well..

It wasn't a flop.  It worked, but the circumstances did not allow me to know if it was worth what I was planning to charge for it.  It was required to have at least one tester receive at least one direct request or invitation for sex that would result in sex if allowed to progress.  Unfortunately, only one of the testers was single, and he was getting results but could not act on them for moral reasons.  This left us with no way to achieve the testing goals, and we ran out of time to continue.

Also  Curious about the effects from the limited release of SARM 2.0

Whats the reason for SARM 2.0 being pulled off the shop so limitedly? Was it just ridiculously powerful - that it must kept limited?

SARM v2.1-B was originally not going to be released at all.  I released it in a limited release because I thought it was a damned shame for it to not be.  But I have reasons for why it was so restricted that I unfortunately can't get into.

And how does it work differently to X4A?

And then how do these 2 (SARM / X4A) work differently to

MYSL - Manifest Your Idea Sexual Lover

X4A is what we call an IEA, which stands for Indirect Exposure Aphrodisiac.  You listen to the subliminal, and then you go out and expose the people you affect to your personal energy field as modulated by X4A.  X4A also has several differences in the specific scripting goals, but the differences are so complex and numerous at this point I can't really get specific right now.  Both are aphrodisiacs, both are creating arousal, both are trying to get to sex, but they use very different approaches and script goals.

SARM is a DEA - Direct Exposure Aphrodisiac.  You have to get the person to be aroused to listen to it directly for it to affect them.

MYSL is a manifestor that seeks to manifest your perfect sexual lover into your life.  It's not an aphrodisiac.

And based on test results of X4A 2000 vs SARM 2 - how do they compare?

keen to hear more of these test stories - they are really exciting..

First, allow me to clarify that SARM v2.1-B was what was available, not v2.  v2 tested out as needing adjustments.  Thus, 2.1-B.

Second, remember that X4A is an IDA and SARM is a DEA.  The ultimate goal is for X4A to work as quickly and intensely as a DEA, but X4A-2000 in 5.11G does not have the same immediate intensity.

SARM is aimed at getting her to initiate sex as quickly as possible.  X4A-2000 is, too, but the deliver approaches make for very different limits.  DEAs are capable of producing more aggressive results because they are directly instructing the subconscious what to do.  X4A and other IEAs are limited by how you use it, how much you execute, and how much you project, as well as how the person responds.  There is a trade off: DEAs are better for creating more intense arousal faster.  IEAs are better for creating more natural and comfortable arousal that is slower, but somewhat more likely to be accepted and acted upon.


SARM v2.1-B compares to X4A-2000 like this.  Exposing a woman to SARM v2.1-B will arouse her and get her to sex 0 to 2 times (depending on circumstances) before the effects wear off.  Then you have to expose her again.  Expose her too soon, and it may not work.  Over time it has a cumulative effect, but it is purely sexual.  She comes to want to have sex with you more over time, but it's just sex unless there is an emotional component already present.

X4A-2000 is less likely to result in sex on the first day, or the second.  But over time, with repeated exposures, it has a cumulative effect, and it seems to induce a sort of bonding with the user that appears to result in her wanting not just sex with the user, but a relationship including sex.  When the goal is just sex, that's not necessarily a good thing.  So I didn't release it based on that as well, since that complicates matters significantly.