Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8

[Shannon]

Thanks Shannon.

So if you were me, would you start running SARM 2.1B by yourself (only exposing yourself until you had a consenting partner) using the long term usage patterns over X4A 5.11g? If I did that what would be the result, high levels of self sexual arousal but without an aura that would target and act as an aphrodisiac on others?

Or is it possible that whatever SARM 2.1B would turn my own aura into would act as an aphrodisiac to women around me?

I guess it would be good to run SARM 2.1B solo as I just spent all this money on it until I get a consenting partner…. But if my goal is to arouse attractive women around me as quickly and effectively as possible, is X4A 5.11g still the better option?

Thank you

SARM v2.1-B is designed to be a Direct Exposure Aphrodisiac.  It is focused primarily on affecting the female(s) in the proximity when it is played.

The reason you would expose yourself to it is to understand how it affects you, so you are not caught off guard by some effect it has while you expose the female(s) you're exposing to it.  It is not intended to be used by a man for long or medium term programming for himself, and it does not affect your aura aside from how your aura would naturally change specifically as a result of you becoming more aroused sexually.

SARM is going to produce a very powerful arousal in those women who are exposed.  However, it's not designed for instant or even rapid effect.  It takes 3 hours of exposure for "fast" results.  That's because it specifically focuses on arousing primarily women, and doing so at a speed that works best for her.  

It is designed for use by couples who both know about and consent to it's use, and can use it with sufficient time and exposure to allow it to work.  It can be used in other ways, but the focus on arousing the female(s) at the best speed for them dominates how and when it can reasonably be used.

For that reason, X4A-1511 is likely a better and more flexible choice for you unless and until you have a woman who is available for such exposures times to SARM v2.1-B.

In case you're interested, I have done experiments with high speed arousal using subliminals.  It works just fine with guys, but women almost always respond with either an effort to escape, or stonewalling.  I stopped doing that experimentation years ago, so I don't know if stonewalling is still possible, but what good is arousing a woman if she responds by trying to escape?  Thus the focus on going at her speed in modern aphrodisiacs.