Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8

[Have at ye]

To me, personally, the newfangled aphrodisiac sounds more enticing than X4A-2000!

Sounds like you could even use it together with one of the X4A programs (not at the same time, of course). Feasible?

Which is more interesting depends on your particular situation, needs and desires.  But you cannot use them together.  Using the new one (ESPA) requires that you be present to be the one she responds to, and that would mean that even though it's designed to only affect females, it will be disrupting X4A running in your head.  And take it from me, the tester who was responsible for overload testing X4A-2000 absolutely did not have fun testing that particular task.

If you have the right women and the right circumstances, ESPA is a good choice.  X4A-2000 is a whole different ball game, being an Indirect Exposure Aphrodisiac, and it takes a lot longer to work, but is much better for certain situations, goals and women.  There is a reason it is a Premium, while ESPA is not.

If you are patient, and you like what X4A-1xxx does, X4A-2000.  If not, ESPA or another Direct Exposure Aphrodisiac.

X4A-2000 is likely to result in not just sex, but a relationship including sex; ESPA is likely to relatively rapidly result in one or more females trying to find ways to seduce you into raw sex.

EDIT: Just realized, X4A-2000 gives you massive social proof also, but in a completely different way.  It's internal, being highly sexually charged energy, vs the external of ESPA communicating that other women are extremely interested.

That explains a lot, thanks. I'd be willing to give these new Direct Exposure Aphrodisiacs a shot.