Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8

[tmp17]

Thanks a lot Shanon for your responses. i have already started 1 loop per day and finished 1 cycle of 4 days ON and 1 day OFF. i don't see much difference except that i see maybe a 3% - 4% increase in hunger. And one of the day i had a strong dream probably fear based, can't remember what it was. Another thing i noticed since i started using DMSI is am more keen to do my exercises.



Its almost 2 months since i am using DMSI 3.5 but i don't see much things moving. So how long am i supposed to use the "4 days ON and 1 day OFF", do i increase the loops or any other things i can do? i am now using the trickling stream flac version in phone with earphones.

Here you are deviating from the instructions in a serious way.  You should be using the speaker of your phone.  For whatever reason, the programs I make tend to be very volume sensitive, and the only way for me to know you're getting what I am trying to have you use is for you to use the instructed volume, on the speaker of your phone.  NOT earbuds or headphones.  Before we try anything else, run one cycle with that change and we will see how it affects your run.

Thanks a lot Shanon for your responses. I agree that i am always pretty bad at following instructions to the dot, not only for this but other areas of life as well, when instructions get a bit more detailed or precise then i tend to simplify it and assume it will work. So anyways i will follow it as exactly instructed by you.

My current usage
Trickling stream flac version
1 Loop 4 days ON and 1 day OFF
Volume - 1 level higher than what is comfortable to hear.


I have started using the phone speakers since in the last 2 days. I don't see anywhere stated that i have to use the phone speakers in the general instructions or the DMSI instructions but anyways i will try it out.

The earphone i was using in the past was ->

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-MDRXB55AP-Ea...1_1?sr=8-1

How long is a good run for DMSI to internalize things before i switch to another program? i am wondering if should either

1) finish like 6 months of DMSI to fully internalize since i have already invested 2 months.

2) go for EPHRA/OGSF

3) go for AM6

You're not internalizing things.  It looks like you're resisting and attempting self sabotage. 

Take a look at this:

https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Types...-Spot-Them

Based on what I currently understand of our conversation, you may be exhibiting Type 9 resistance tactics.

I'm not entirely sure how well you have followed the instructions during your time using this program, but it's very clear that you're fighting it.  If you're not using it properly, it cannot achieve the best results.  But more importantly, if you're seeing little to no results, then you really need to move to a program that deals with the root issue holding you back, which is almost certainly fear, maybe mixed with guilt and or shame.  So in your shoes, I would switch to OGSF v2.  Just make sure you use it properly.  Then you can come back later and see how you respond to DMSI.

The thing is i did see some results in general even when i was running the 6-7 loops and so on. General results like more IOI's from different women, some celebrity effect and so on. But i could not see more enhanced results on the person i was focused on AND surprisingly i never felt hunger, sleep or other symptoms which were heavily mentioned by other folks in the blog.

Sometimes i feel i am trying to move the things or get into seduction where actually with DMSI i should not be doing anything and instead let DMSI do its job. Probably the neediness is blocking my success (just guessing).

I will consider switching to OGSFv2, how many days break should i give. 1 week? considering DMSI was not kicking in much anyways.

Wow.. interesting you rightly pointed out the type 9 which could possibly true in my case..., while i was reading some DMSI journals where someone stated let it do it's job and came back to the Type 9 resistance, indeed it striked me that, i am trying to push things thinking that my push will help.

reading what you have written about AM7 i am really excited and eager to get started. it looks very fascinating. So a humble request can AM7 be done much earlier. Because without a proper base i feel i will just be getting temporary success which will die off soon and become extra painful.

AM7 is already queued to be the 2nd program I build in 6G, but it cannot be built until 6G is finished being developed, and that requires a LOT of work, which has to be fit in between my monthly title builds.  I am pretty much going as fast as I can on this.  6G has to be the best I can make it, and for that we need to basically revise, update and optimize the entire skeleton script, which is pretty huge.  It can take me multiple days to finish a single statement.  This task has been ongoing for a while now, but I can't work on it all the time because I still have to publish at least one title each month.

I will await AM7, hope it comes fast.

I got introduced to IML just a year back and i have already bought a few programs (OFv4, ASR5.9G, PE, DMSI, etc.) i don't have AM6 so it would make sense me to directly buy AM7.

There is benefit from running AM v6 before AM v7, but until you have the foundation handled, even AM6 will not achieve it's goals for you.  The foundation will be built into AM v7, but you can get a head start by using EHPRA and OGSF.

I like someone at work place and was getting some good IOI's specially non-stop eye contacts and so on. Later i started DMSI to enhance things. Its almost 2 months since i am using DMSI 3.5. For some reason while i know that i should not be showing my interests. But to move things ahead when i got a chance, while doing a short chat i joked about the person ignoring me in chat and this girl replied back saying don't joke about these things, with a grimacing face smiley. Which i think was quite negative and kind of a atleast a temporary rejection. Probably this was a shit test. To show some self respect and that i don't tolerate such things, i casually started ignoring the person and keeping a distance. Not sure where this is going to go.



i also felt that the joke framed me somewhat lower than her.



I was wondering, being in DMSI i should not be making moves to seduce others instead it should be the other way round. And i should be just ignoring girls to some extent, demonstrating some high value or so. For some reason naturally i would have not gone that fast but i felt i got a push from DMSI to take the risk or so. so felt a bit strange or not sure if there is anything more to it. Or if this is part of a bigger/larger game. Shannon any advice/suggestion please.

So firstly, it is (in my opinion) a mistake to rely on text, chats and written communication when you are flirting and trying to communicate with someone you like because the potential for misunderstanding is huge. 

DMSI is designed specifically to get them to move on you, without you having to do anything.  This sounds to me like you're resisting the program out of fear, and then out of fear trying to push things to happen.  That's not good in either direction.  I think you should stop DMSI and focus on killing that fear with OGSF v2.

Agree that txt based communication results in miscom and probably could be the case.


I am fine to move to OGSFv2 if that is going to help more but i also feel like will i miss out on attracting this some should if i don't stick to DMSI?

OR should i run OGSFv2 for like 2-3 months and switch back to DMSI.