Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8

[Shannon]

@Shannon says:

I have started seeing some really crazy results during my tests of X4A-2000. I am in the 5th or 6th week of testing, and I will most likely continue testing until the end of April, possibly to the end of May, even though I am deeply wanting to get back to Money Magnet. Because the longer I run this thing, the crazier the results get, and I have the feeling that if I use it long enough I will see results that are much crazier still.

........

.....

...

As usual with Premiums, this program is aimed at those who are at an advanced level of self mastery and execution with subliminals, so it is definitely not for everyone. But it is definitely living up to it's threat profile for existing committed relationships so far. I will have to shut down testing for myself if the results get too crazy and threaten my relationship, but until then, or when I am satisfied that the predicted results have resulted or will not result, I'll keep going.

We have BIATBW +/S 4G

We have AOS 4G

But isn't that what DMSI (in almost 6G) and SM (in 5G) are for?

Why the need for the new program?

#confused

X4A has been out for a year, and is in it's 2nd version.  You're just asking this now?

The issue is with SM is that 5G isn't powerful enough and it's a multi-stage program that would be too expensive to upgrade at the current moment (because it will require and upgrade of AM and itself both multi-stage programs, and 5.11/6G are not simple and easy to build in, never mind multi-stage programs.

DMSI is currently in a position where it is triggering fears that most people seem to have about actually achieving sex.  I've pretty much put it down because of burnout, and because I need to try a different approach to see if that reveals anything about how to make it work better.

X4A is that alternate approach.  It strips things down to the bare essentials, and v 1xxx also attempts to make it as easy to execute and as "not scary" as possible for those who respond to DMSI with "Oh shit, I might actually get laid!" or somehow think that getting laid will get them killed.  In other words, an effort to see things from a different perspective and take a different approach to see if that sheds any light on what needs to be done with DMSI.

X4A-2xxx abandons all "training wheels".  It doesn't try to make the program as "not scary" to execute as possible, it attempts to make the user so arousing to the affected that they have to make a choice - avoid, or do something about it.  Partly because this makes for better, more obvious results, and partly because training wheels are like coddling a little boy: he's not going to grow up and become a healthy and successful man if mommy always protects him from that scary world out there and bubble wraps him so he can't make mistakes and learn from them.  The goal of the 2xxx series is to maximize the effectiveness and success of this approach as much as possible while retaining free will for both the user and those the user is affecting.  It is intentionally polarizing to the greatest degree possible, so that a choice is made, instead of the third option of "choosing to not make a decision", which is, of course, also a decision.

These are all different approaches, which all get different results and show me different facets of the situation so I learn something and am better able to make something that works in the future.  About like mapping out the facets of a polished diamond so you can know where it is, what it's shape is and how many facets it has.  Each facet tells you something about the whole, and gives more and more clues as to not just what the thing is, but how to get the results you want regarding that thing.

The idea behind X4A is to make the user very obviously sexually arousing to those who the user wants to have sex with.  They then make note of that fact, and decide what to do about it.  DMSI attempted to create intense sexual attraction and get the affected to act on that.  SM made the user a super sexual alpha, as far as it and it's technology could do so.  They all give me more data and understanding of how the human animal works regarding sex and sexuality and what triggers the copulation response without forcing it or removing free will and free choice.

By the looks of it, X4A-2000 is a good bit of the way there, and what I learn from it and later versions will very likely help me make DMSI work much better.