12-17-2021, 01:29 PM
(12-16-2021, 08:53 PM)NOMAD Wrote:(12-16-2021, 04:15 PM)Shannon Wrote: Later, we went to have ice cream and there were some cuties there, but nothing significant. We like to have ice cream and take a walk on the boardwalk by the river every so often as bonding time, and this time I noted that people were getting out of our way rather pointedly on the sidewalk. Later on, gf started holding my hand, which she almost never initiates. The effects it is having on me is making for her to be much more loving and enjoyable for romantic company. I can only wonder what this thing would do on a date, or in a strip club or a dance club or bar.
I am definitely going to build this as a couples option. Not sure when though.
I love this.
Fulfillment in a .Flac File (FFF technology)(feel free to use that one Shannon)
As a married man, I'm faithful to my wife. She's beautiful. She's smart. Her personality fits me as well as I can imagine. But in all honesty...the way to my heart is through a combo of sexuality and intimacy. Sometimes, whether it's from societal conditioning, genetics,...whatever...that connection...the core...that suffers.
A program like this could restore relationships all over the world...even revive/reinvigorate the good ones.
.
While I do encourage you to use/evaluate DMSI 3.5 and do a couples version when you're able to collect enough data to make it the most badass thing possible, I'd buy it tomorrow even though I wouldn't be able to use it for a year+. On that note, UMSv2 Stage2 is the most amazing sub that I've used to date.
I'm looking forward to getting back to UMS v2.
DMSI for couples is coming. I just have to find a path back to what UMS v2 was doing while I'm not using it. In just 4 loops, DMSI has managed to put me on a completely different path. I'm enjoying what it's doing for my relationship, but I also see the very real danger in running it too much while in a committed relationship. I suspect that for that reason, and what it's doing to what UMS v2 had accomplished, I will shortly be going back to UMS v2.
So far I'm impressed with not only how transparent DMSI v3.5/5.8G is, but how powerful it is. Never in all my days have I seen some of the things I have seen since I started using DMSI 3.5. Even when compared to my best efforts previously with direct aphrodisiacs, DMSI seems to be achieving the results not just more and better, but many times faster as well. I think at this point the only thing we need is the right usage patterns and the right circumstances, as we're done. For example, if the ones you're getting responses from are getting up and leaving the area after a few minutes, it's very likely because they cannot stay and resist responding, and yet they happen to be in a situation where they cannot respond. Public, with friends, and the guy has a woman sitting next to him.
Just need to find the right usage patterns and the rest ought to be history... of course encountering the responder in a place where she or he can respond without causing themselves issues is good too.
I am very much looking forward to building DMSI for couples.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!