12-16-2021, 02:38 PM
(12-13-2021, 12:52 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-12-2021, 07:40 PM)HMoody Wrote:(12-11-2021, 11:57 AM)Shannon Wrote: By the way, when you run this thing, always remember that it is designed to weed out people who:
This will weed out a lot of opportunities you might want to take. Don't assume you aren't getting results; it's just DMSI protecting you from bad situations. This means that when you do get results, DMSI should have a LOT more energy to use to help things go your way. Just wait until you encounter that 8-9-10 who is free and clear.
- Are not free to have sex with you.
- Are underage in your jurisdiction.
- Cannot legally consent to sex in your jurisdiction.
- Cannot have sex with you without causing harm to themselves or anyone else.
I'm about 54 minutes into my first loop and starting to get tired. This started at about 50 minutes. I started running it right after having lunch, so I have enough food. It must be projecting more energy than I can easily source.
When this is finished, I'm going to go to the bookstore and read for a while, and see if anyone responds.
I'm curious about Point 4 and what constitutes harm to themselves or anyone else? How is that defined? For example, If the attraction to you causes hurt feelings in someone else that likes them but is not dating them...Is that harmful? Or let's say they were looking to leave a relationship anyways and attraction to you gives them that final push to do so. In a sense it harms their current partner as well as themselves because breakups are usually painful to one or both parties. Does that mean the DMSI would not target them? A lot of things can be considered harmful depending on point of view...so I'm curious as to where the line is drawn in regards to the program.
Harm to themselves or anyone else is self defined. I cannot offer a more specific definition than you can, everyone is different, and every situation is different. So my best effort to prevent DMSI from causing cheating, breaking up relationships and families is to include this. You draw the line.
I'm guessing this is harm is defined at a subconscious level? I understand your intent but did wonder if that might not be perceived as a way not to execute by the resistant parts. Sort of an excuse since it does seem so open-ended.
