10-26-2021, 01:53 PM
(10-26-2021, 01:21 PM)lano1106 Wrote: AbondanceCH,
you bring good points, IMHO.
On one hand, if you are really serious about a certain goal, you won't mind investing time in reaching it.
but the long listening periods definitely limit how many programs that I can purchase at any given time...
you are on something when suggesting to rebuild popular programs to shorten their listening periods could be profitable...
time is precious...
Another option would be if new technology would allow running multiple programs at the same time...
The trio ME/DMSI/UMS could be quite something... ;-)
Don't you think it would make the most sense to achieve the primary goal of one title consistently for the majority of users before we start trying to divide 1 by 3 and get 1 as a result?
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
