Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5

[Shannon]

[snip]
Agree with the complexity. The subliminals are good, but when you make subliminals to atract almost every woman you like with out do it nothing, become millionaire, ultra monetary success, or similar subliminals that pretend something so difficult, we return to the beginning, is really complex that people achieve this goals, so the programs are helping the people to change believes, facing some inner issues, etc, and are great for yhis kind of things, being more motivated, etc, but if the objetives are much more bigger, even if the subliminal is helping, it doesnt achieve the goals generally. 

The first thing you have to keep in mind is that the program isn't achieving the goals, you are.  It's a set of instructions, and you have to execute them.  That's why we keep developing things - to figure out how to create the instruction set that results in the desired level of execution.  But it's important to rememvber that the program can't achieve the goals.  It can only give you the instructions that, if you execute them, will result in you achieving the goals.

But this has nothing to do with how good the models are.  That was the point I was trying to make.  

All what i said i quite logical. A program that really achieve this kind of goals even i  the 65% of the persons could be sell for 1.000 thousand dollars. I have bought many many programs, i have nver ask for a refund, all the programs helped me in somoe ways, but none of them have achive all the goals even using them as instructed, so i think i can say my opinion, and in this case i was answering your question. Any flawless logic i see. 

I'm not saying anything about your right to express your opinion.  What I'm saying is that the accuracy of the models is the reason for us not having subliminals that more effectively achieve the goals for everyone is not the issue.  The subliminals have been getting better and better over time, because over time I learn more and more about how to communicate effectively and successfully with the subconscious parts of the human awareness. That, and how to achieve acceptance, cooperation and action on the goals of the program in the face of a brain that has parts that are logical and parts that are illogical (emotional) and parts that aren't even aware enough to be more than purely instinctual in their awareness.  

This requires me to understand not just how these things work, but how to discover how they work (since they're hidden).  To make use of the models, I have to know enough to know what to ask.  Again, the point is, how accurate the models are isn't the issue.  The issue is knowing enough to know what to ask the models.  And the reason the programs I make have been getting better and better is because over time, I learn a little more and a little more, and each step makes me better able to know what to ask the models.  

I think its good that not everybody says what we all want to hear, it could help more.

It's not about that, though.  I don't want people to just say what they think I want to hear.  What I am trying to communicate is that the models are not the issue.