Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5

[Shannon]

@Shannon

Regarding the UMS v2 - 1 stage or 3+1 stages question.

Here's a possibility that may not have been considered:

So all 5.75G subs have a secondary ASRB ratio (i.e use the sub X days on and Y days off).

It may be possible to get around the issue of boredom with a single stage UMS by adding a 3rd order ASRB ratio. For example - use the sub for 3 days on and 5 days off for 80 days - then take an additional 10 days off.

The 15 days off at the end could be enough time to get around the boredom, but not long enough to lose the momentum.

It's worth a shot looking at the models to see if a 3rd order ASRB ratio would increase the effectiveness of the sub - for all the users in general, and specifically for the sub-category of users which experience subconscious boredom.

I was also thinking that the boredom could mean ASRB3 for some time off to execute, get rid of boredom and start another bigger cycle. Shannon always talks about cycles, these are the good ones

And with the 3+1 or single stage: the single stage is cheaper, but (!) we don't want cheap, we want the best results. With the modelling it might be complicated (I don't know exactly how it works) but if you ask question the devil is in the detail:
So if you ask "which program makes more users a millionnaire?" If single stage is a lot cheaper and more people buy it, there is a higher chance that one more person will become a millionnaire. So it might be helpful to ask in percentage of users, not in absolute numbers (in my head the models will be like "you get the answers you asked for, so if you want that, I can also give you that" - yes, I know, the models do not participate in conversation, it was just in my head)

Anyway whichever it is - 3+1 or single -  I wish all of us a lot fun and success with it.

With the 3+1 I was also thinking of a program like the seasons: One is for preparing (clearing out beliefs, etc - baseline programming but starting of manifesting), the second stage is mostly manifesting and the third one is being ready for the harvest, openness to receive the money, but also manifesting.

Just to clarify, when I model things like this, the goal is to find out what works best, what makes my customers the happiest with the results it produces and what produces the highest profits.  Profits show that people are buying it, and NOT asking for a refund.  Marketing can sell it, but only a good product that achieves its goals will avoid refunds.  The idea, basically, is "What works best for everybody?"  I'm not modeling things like how many people become millionaires.  I'm looking for a product that sells well, makes customers happy and produces the best results for me as a result.