Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5

[Broski]

[snip]

Without getting too abstract, it surprises me you could get an if, then statement to work at all, given that those are predicated on the principle of cause and effect, which for all intents and purposes doesn't exist in the 'real' reality of the continuous moment that I assume the subconscious is aware of and operates in. Have you chosen a successor to inherit your compendium of information? I don't imagine you'll perish any time soon, but quite frankly I believe it would be a severe blow to the future of mankind if you take everything you've learned with you, whenever that may be.

On an unrelated note, as a 6+ year DMSI tester, I sometimes wonder if you'd ever consider re-enabling the long range sniper. I have a few tales related to that which defy logical explanation, but in due time.

That is indeed a serious challenge to the process.  That is not the only reason it's such a challenge, however.  Not even close.

To choose a successor will require that someone who can pass all the required tests is available to test.  Said person must also arrive at the right time for the testing.  That time is not now.  I have much to do before I start looking for a successor.

DMSI-Final may have the option of a version with a LRS, but that is not for sure.  DMSI-Final is also versions into the future.

Hey Shannon, what is your criteria for determining the final version of DMSI? I know it is likely based upon a certain degrees of succus, but what encompasses those specific parameters?