02-15-2021, 11:36 AM
(02-15-2021, 10:19 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(02-15-2021, 09:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: The models specifically and uniformly disqualified every attempt I made to find a way to include that.
I actually find that interesting. It makes me wonder then if the whole IQ, etc having to do with genetics might not be as influential as some scientist believe then if it was giving you that type of answer. Granted it might not have said why I guess. But still interesting none the less.
I would say it is at least as likely that I just don't yet know how to safely and effectively manipulate genetics at that level of complexity.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!