(06-20-2020, 11:37 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-20-2020, 11:13 AM)lano1106 Wrote: Could OF be so important that it might be integrated in the 6G skeleton script?
If we integrated OF into the skeleton script, it would distract from the goals of the program, unless the goals of the program were to overcome all fears. That's why we use FRM instead - which is, in fact, part of the skeleton script. FRM deals only with those fears standing in the way of achieving the goals of the program in which it is found.
Quote:How about those using older programs? Should they consider running a bit OF before the using the older programs to improve the program effectiveness. I'm completing BASE and I'm planning to do a AM6 stage 7 refresher + WM2.
It is possible to use OF to improve the effectiveness of all other subliminals.
Quote:If the answer is yes for the last question, what would be the recommended OF usage pattern?
thx,
Follow the instructions.
I went to see the instructions and I'm fearing the commitment ;-)
It is an even bigger commitment than a 6 stages program commitment!
I'll need to think about it in the next 3 weeks which is the remaining period to complete BASE.
On one hand, doing OF would push back by 2/3 of year using the programs that are in my pipe (WM2, DMSI, UMS).
OTOH, I'm conscious that I have fears lurking that are stopping me to do stuff. Writing my journals did show that plus possibly all the fears that I'm not aware of. This is a source of procrastination. I wouldn't qualify those fears as poisonous and paralyzing big fears but they are strong enough to hold me back.
There is a chance that addressing those fears directly and freeing myself from them could have a much bigger life changing effect than only pursuing specific goals with targeted programs.
Idk if that would be possible but I wonder if removing current unconscious fears would unlock the full potential of all the already installed programs.
It is not an easy choice but one that I'll seriously consider in the next 2-3 weeks...
Here is one last question about OF. In the next 8 months. Do you think this program could receive updates if down the road you discovers ways to improve it further and could its users upgrade without having to 'reset' the required 8 months period requirement or having to pause to avoid the turbulence period that 5.5+G programs transition are causing?
I know that this is a highly hypothetical question but I'm trying gauge the result certainty and IML commitment to make the program deliver the promised result in case I choose to invest in it time wise since it is brand new program...
