I've read some that we men divide our friendships and connections with men by instinct like we would be ready to go to war - by ordering things in status and hierarchies. But if the TAM disregard status as he is his own source of status - wouldn't that mean that it disrupts men's most intuitive way of working together?
And even if it "only" make men see this man as the leader - it's maybe not always the best leader for the particular situation - where "natural" status selection would be better at picking the best leader.
And even if it "only" make men see this man as the leader - it's maybe not always the best leader for the particular situation - where "natural" status selection would be better at picking the best leader.