12-05-2019, 11:50 AM
(12-05-2019, 10:11 AM)guyinlahore Wrote:(12-05-2019, 09:37 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-04-2019, 02:05 PM)Yous Wrote:(12-04-2019, 08:32 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-03-2019, 03:13 PM)Yous Wrote: And something for the gums?
It will work in you have a flu or a cold?
The goal of MHS is to trigger healing of anything and everything that can be healed, and make it heal at maximum speed without scarring.
If your gums are damaged or inflamed, it will help heal them, but the cause is likely infection, and MHS does not work on infections. It is not intended to affect colds or flus. For that you want Maximum Immune Response.
Sorry to insist, but if you are ill healing should work as well in that direction, maybe not as much as MIR, but should work there as well?
Not necessarily.
Having MHS and MIR in one program is coming, but it has not been an option yet because I needed to develop them separately to a sufficient degree. I also needed to consider the energy requirements for combining them.
Having them together is going to be useful for specific scenarios only. For example, you have some sort of major open wound (gunshot, major burn, broken bone that goes through the skin, stab wound, etc. It would be helpful to both heal it as quickly as possible and prevent infection as much as possible.
But for a flu, cold, sore throat, that would be a serious waste of energy, unnecessary division of focus and generally overkill.
When I am done with MHS v2 5.75G and MIR v3 5.75G, I will be releasing them individually and as a combination of MHS and GPR, MHS and MIR and MHS, MIR and GPR.
These should be used for what they are good for, though. You don't need MHS, MIR and GPR for a cold or flu, using that example again. Maybe MIR and GPR, but usually MIR alone will be best for something like that.
MHS is aimed at healing your flesh. If you have a cold, there is really no flesh healing necessary. During a severe flu with major body aches, it might be argued that MHS could help, but do you try to heal the cells while they're being destroyed by a virus infection, causing the pain, or do you focus everything on killing the virus? I would argue that using MHS and MIR in that case is again a waste of time and energy because it lessens the effectiveness of MIR, and MIR is what is helping you kill off the virus that is destroying the cells of your body through hijacking them to replicate itself, and causing the pain.
I would use MIR, or possibly MIR with GPR instead.
So if someone is suffering from heart problem, blood pressure, weak digestion, enlarged prostate, weak eyesight, poor blood circulation then MHS is the right product. Is that correct ?
If those were my issues, I would choose MHS.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!