10-03-2019, 11:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2019, 11:50 AM by AlphaRomeo.)
(10-03-2019, 11:03 AM)Shannon Wrote: Stop fiddling around with one or two loops at a time then. I'm relatively certain that the reason the models indicated 1 loop and then 7 days off was because the step up was so big and people would need to get used to it, and because we would need to see how long bloom should last.
If you want to overpower DMSI, you're going to have to get serious. Even then it's going to take a while.
Try 6-8 loops for 1-3 days on and then 5 days off.
This is the first time I remember when your comment does not make sense, or if it does I have to be mind reader to more or less extend. Maybe its language barrier for me that slightly confuses the message.
If UMS is so powerful, how come DOUBLING the number of loops is considered "fiddling". I had no way of knowing, which is why I asked you. I also had no way of knowing exactly how much more powerful DMSI is. How is model indication of UMS relative to my question? Before my mistake, 7 days off worked better than less days off (not 5, or 4), for me. Also, 1 loop per day has been working fine as my post about how I felt just before the mistake indicates, I never needed feel for 6-8 loops as others have been doing, which is why I didnt do it in these past three days either but instead doubled the loops.
Asking you for advice is not serious?
Yes, I made a mistake, and no, Im not gonna dwell on it. Instead, the best course of action is to take best course of action, which is why I asked your advice. In this case, "Try 6-8 loops for 1-3 days on and then 5 days off", would have been enough, instead of comments about fiddling and accusing me of not being serious.
Thank you for the advice tho.
GNOTHI SEAUTON - KNOW THYSELF