(09-19-2018, 12:27 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(09-19-2018, 12:00 PM)Greenduck Wrote:(09-19-2018, 11:42 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(09-19-2018, 11:07 AM)Greenduck Wrote:(09-19-2018, 05:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: No. Not even the anti-sniper will currently do that. Although I could set up the AS to do that. But first, do we really want the anti-sniper or not? Those who don't want it are convinced it is responsible for reducing the program effectiveness. The rest are convinced it saves them from all sorts of nasty situations.
The guys who blame it sounds like guys who blame stuff.
On the other hand the guys who want it sound like they are too fearful.
Nope. Just comfortable enough to not want to deal with unnecessary drama.
Right. I’ll take my chances.
Like I said, AS for dangerous stuff is well and good, “unnecessary drama” is too easily misinterpreted. “This girl is acting illogical! Unnecessary drama!” Like that.
I’m pretty sure Shannon would use some more refine scripting, perhaps based on some different scenarios, rather than putting “unnecessary drama” right in there.
