myth's Belated DMSI 3.1 Journal

[myth]

Prologue: Externals, part 2.

Female initiation of sexual encounters (direct physical indicators, strangers)

1. Preexisting DMSI? Yes.
   
2. While listening to DMSI? Yes.
   
3. Difference in frequency so far? Roughly the same.
   
4. Difference in quality so far?/ Preliminary discussion seems more optional.
   
5. Before/during preference so far? Split. Conversation becoming unnecessary appeals to my laziness. Conversation becoming unnecessary leads to uninformed choices. Uninformed choices often lead to undesirable results.
   

Female initiation of sexual encounters (direct physical indicators, established)

1. Preexisting DMSI? Yes.
   
2. While listening to DMSI? Yes.
   
3. Difference in frequency so far? Occasional uptick.
   
4. Difference in quality so far? More appreciative and playful.
   
5. Before/during preference so far? During.
   

Female initiation of sexual encounters (verbal indicators)

1. Preexisting DMSI? Yes.
   
2. While listening to DMSI? Yes.
   
3. Difference in frequency so far? Mild uptick.
   
4. Difference in quality so far? Pre-physical announcement has increased.
   
5. Before/during preference so far? Mostly before. Spelled-out intent by the pursuer (the responder, in the case of DMSI) seems redundant when the pursuer is truly pursuing. Going from women kissing me passionately and unexpectedly, in the moment, to women prearranging to kiss me feels like a step backward. As does going from women acting on attraction to women telling me that they have a crush and then expecting me to do something. I can meet (and have met) them halfway, of course, but it wasn't previously a requirement for me to do so. Consent/higher value/clear interest are valid counter-arguments; I'm just offering a point of view.
   

Female initiation of sexual encounters (remote indicators)

1. Preexisting DMSI? Yes.
   
2. While listening to DMSI? Yes.
   
3. Difference in frequency so far? Increased frequency per social outing. Increased parallel impact (more at once). Increased repetition.
   
4. Difference in quality so far? Greater enthusiasm. Thanks to social events, mostly in the form of unbroken eye contact, staring, micro-expressions, longer and repeated proximity changes, summoning gestures, dancing, and social rescue pleas. Parallel impact seems competitive-but-respectful.
   
5. Before/during preference so far? During. I've always valued sub-verbal conversation with respect to all people and situations, especially as physical dialogue isn't strictly sexual. It's also helpful when in loud and noisy locations.