05-25-2017, 10:39 AM
(05-25-2017, 10:25 AM)hsindermann Wrote:(05-24-2017, 07:28 PM)Shannon Wrote: You of course are conveniently "forgetting" that your results are the result of your cooperation level with the program. The program is more powerful; you had to go to greater lengths than before not to get any results.
So you can kiss MY butt for resisting and then trying to blame the program, and then being snarky about it.
Then why am I going to greater lengths to resist it, if I did not resist the previous version? And isn't it the task of the sub to convince me to cooperate, because as far as I know I can not consciously overrule the decision of my subconscious to not cooperate. Hence it's strange to then point the finger at the resisting user when apparently your sub fails to make me cooperate
Since you did not experience the design goals, you did resist the last one - only less so. The more you push a person to deal with and face what they fear, the more they will try to resist.
The sub does not MAKE you do anything. It is a set of instructions. It is designed to be persuasive, yes, but ultimately the user is responsible for the act of executing the script.
So what we have her is evidence that the program is indeed more powerful because you are resisting it more than previously, meaning it is closer to achieving something that some subconscious part of you fears to a great degree.
The more the resistance, the more the fear required to result in that resistance. And you would not have any resistance to something that was not having any effect on you.
Ergo, the more you resist, the more powerful the program must be and the more effort you must expend to maintain resistance.
Now then... we have changed from an experiment of 2 loops a day to whatever your gut tells you is best for you. So I encourage you to try running 6+ loops a day from here on out. If you're getting no results and stonewalling 3.1 perfectly, I suggest at least 8 loops a day if you can manage it.
Then see what happens.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!