05-24-2017, 10:08 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-24-2017, 10:10 AM by hsindermann.)
... and the grand prize for worst performing DMSI version goes to ... *drum roll* ... 3.1!!
For me personally that is. I'm not sure what's the problem with 3.1, but now after running it for almost 3 months I'm still not seeing the tiniest glimpse of a result. After having results on 3.0 this is frustrating and disappointing. So I herewith give up on this version. I will go back to 3.0A, which gave me nice results after a few weeks. With a bit of luck they'll come back earlier now. It's summer and I want results, and the next DMSI version will probably not come before end of July or so.
And nobody come and say 3.1 is sooo much more powerful - if there's no results at all, then powerful can kiss my butt.
I might jump on the MLS waggon when it comes out - not decided yet. Will probably depend on how 3.0 performs by when MLS comes out.
For me personally that is. I'm not sure what's the problem with 3.1, but now after running it for almost 3 months I'm still not seeing the tiniest glimpse of a result. After having results on 3.0 this is frustrating and disappointing. So I herewith give up on this version. I will go back to 3.0A, which gave me nice results after a few weeks. With a bit of luck they'll come back earlier now. It's summer and I want results, and the next DMSI version will probably not come before end of July or so.
And nobody come and say 3.1 is sooo much more powerful - if there's no results at all, then powerful can kiss my butt.
I might jump on the MLS waggon when it comes out - not decided yet. Will probably depend on how 3.0 performs by when MLS comes out.