04-20-2017, 06:31 PM
Until we motivate the males enough, they will resist allowing the females to initiate sex with them, because they so deeply base their reality on the belief that they must pursue to achieve sex. And until we sufficiently motivate the females, they will resist allowing themselves to initiate sex with males in ways that are obvious in "male-ese" instead of being obvious in "female-ese".
What we are seeing, that you dismiss, is "female-ese". What you demand is "male-ese".
Males and females do not speak the same language, or communicate the same way. Getting a man to even realize this is constantly frustrating for females, as society has demanded of them that they are not allowed to communicate openly, as is expected of males.
They therefore communicate in subtle ways, such as hinting, body language, and creating opportunities for a male to act in order to achieve the end goal. A woman who acts like a man when it comes to sex is instantly regarded as, and derided as, a variety of very negative things.
What you are looking for is the results of DMSI 3.x-Final. Where we have everything ready and she is sufficiently influenced and motivated to communicate her need for sex in a male communication style.
But just because so far we do not have that happening to everyone, does not mean it is not going to happen, is not possible or is not happening for anyone.
A big part of the reason others are getting better results is that they understand what I just said. A woman communicates like a woman, and a man communicates like a man. And while the goal of DMSI is to make a woman communicate and pursue like a man, when used by a straight man, it is not a binary journey.
There are steps and stages of increasing effectiveness and success on the way from 0 to 100.
You are demanding that if it's not 100, it's 0. That's not the case. You don't take a whole staircase in one step. Likewise, we are not going to achieve the goal in one try. Each iteration shows me what I need to do to enhance and increase the results towards the goal. And each release gets us a greater percentage of the way to the goal. But you are refusing to see anything but the end goal. And if that is how you want to play it, you're going to have to wait until we have built DMSI 3.x-Final to get any "real" results. Even though you've been getting real results for a while now.
It boils down to you trying to resist the program by raising the bar. And I'm pretty sure that's conscious resistance. But whatever, we'll get there regardless.
What we are seeing, that you dismiss, is "female-ese". What you demand is "male-ese".
Males and females do not speak the same language, or communicate the same way. Getting a man to even realize this is constantly frustrating for females, as society has demanded of them that they are not allowed to communicate openly, as is expected of males.
They therefore communicate in subtle ways, such as hinting, body language, and creating opportunities for a male to act in order to achieve the end goal. A woman who acts like a man when it comes to sex is instantly regarded as, and derided as, a variety of very negative things.
What you are looking for is the results of DMSI 3.x-Final. Where we have everything ready and she is sufficiently influenced and motivated to communicate her need for sex in a male communication style.
But just because so far we do not have that happening to everyone, does not mean it is not going to happen, is not possible or is not happening for anyone.
A big part of the reason others are getting better results is that they understand what I just said. A woman communicates like a woman, and a man communicates like a man. And while the goal of DMSI is to make a woman communicate and pursue like a man, when used by a straight man, it is not a binary journey.
There are steps and stages of increasing effectiveness and success on the way from 0 to 100.
You are demanding that if it's not 100, it's 0. That's not the case. You don't take a whole staircase in one step. Likewise, we are not going to achieve the goal in one try. Each iteration shows me what I need to do to enhance and increase the results towards the goal. And each release gets us a greater percentage of the way to the goal. But you are refusing to see anything but the end goal. And if that is how you want to play it, you're going to have to wait until we have built DMSI 3.x-Final to get any "real" results. Even though you've been getting real results for a while now.
It boils down to you trying to resist the program by raising the bar. And I'm pretty sure that's conscious resistance. But whatever, we'll get there regardless.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!