01-27-2017, 11:15 AM
(01-25-2017, 06:49 AM)Nox Wrote: I didn't really care about trump vs. hillary until I saw a debate. I hate Clinton but trump just sounds like a buffoon. Either way they're both shitty options so whatever. Mankind has dug its own hole so they can enjoy it lol.
I did note the differences between the two's supporters during the election, though. Mostly out in public and when I'd catch conversations. Trump had the old redneck vote locked down, and Hillary was spoon feeding dipshit hipster kids their own nonsense. Not saying that supporters either way are only of a certain type, but its always funny to see who the loud talkers are supporting.
Too bad neither of them were smart enough to get everyone behind them. Conservatives lemming themselves off cliffs for reminders of the good old days lazines and liberals love progressive and inclusive laziness.
CHANGE! America can be great again, and better for everyone! Lol
@RisingSonman I tried to watch that video as it seemed like it could be interesting. The first five minutes was of the guy getting nowhere so I quit. I understand that he has to go over that stuff as most individuals are unaware of themselves but it was boring me to tears. I assume it gets better but damn.
There was a reason Trump was made to look like a Buffoon. Its because the Mainstream media was in the tank for Hilary. Originally I was going to sit this race out but as soon as I started questioning what everyone else said the media reporting I realized it was just blatant lies and when wikileaks dumped all those Hillary clinton emails it exposed a lot of corruption both within the establishment of both parties and the Media. The reason I say he was portrayed a certain way was there was a particular leak that exposed a Private dinner thrown by Hillary's campaign adviser where they essentially were colluding on how they were going to win it for Hillary.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/...-advisors/
Notice that, 65 different MSM reporters were in the tank for hillary (whether for kickbacks or they just agree with her). Now tell me, knowing this do you think these people were exactly objective and honest in their reporting? or were they reporting with a agenda? Also, did you know there's a email that was leaked where it shows Hillary was trying to pull strings to elevate Trump on the republican side because she thought she could win against him (Opps, guess that didn't work out like planned). I should point out to that I had not trusted the mainstream media for years since I worked for top secret work in the Navy. I caught them telling lies or covering up stuff plenty of times so I haven't trusted a word they say for years (Don't trust the government either since I use to work for it).
With that said, I'm not some fervent Trump supporter either, if he messes up I'm going to call him out on it. So far though he hasn't done anything bad and has actually worked to keep his promises unlike most politicians. On the supporters side, that was also a media lie and trying to convince you to think a certain way. Trump actually got the most support from minorities of any recent republican candidate and also got the majority of the white women vote. This is a far cry from the "just rednecks" narrative that the media was trying to sell everyone. Many of these people were also former Sanders supports who, after they found out Hillary rigged the primary, voted for Trump out of spite.
"I have no use of disciples. Let everyone be their own true follower" - Nietzsche